Topographic Measurement of Individual Laser Tracks in Alloy 625 Bare Plates

Additive manufacturing (AM) combines all of the complexities of materials processing and manufacturing into a single process. The digital revolution made this combination possible, but the commercial viability of these technologies for critical parts may depend on digital process simulations to guide process development, product design, and part qualification. For laser powder bed fusion, one must be able to model the behavior of a melt pool produced by a laser moving at a constant velocity over a smooth bare metal surface before taking on the additional complexities of this process. To provide data on this behavior for model evaluations, samples of a single-phase nickel-based alloy were polished smooth and exposed to a laser beam at three different power and speed settings in the National Institute of Standards and Technology Additive Manufacturing Metrology Testbed and a commercial AM machine. The solidified track remaining in the metal surface after the passing of the laser is a physical record of the position of the air–liquid–solid interface of the melt pool trailing behind the laser. The surface topography of these tracks was measured and quantified using confocal laser scanning microscopy for use as benchmarks in AM model development and validation. These measurements are part of the Additive Manufacturing Benchmark Test Series.

[1]  Richard Leach,et al.  Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing , 2016 .

[2]  B. Colosimo,et al.  Process defects and in situ monitoring methods in metal powder bed fusion: a review , 2017 .

[3]  L. Levine,et al.  Homogenization Kinetics of a Nickel-based Superalloy Produced by Powder Bed Fusion Laser Sintering. , 2017, Scripta materialia.

[4]  M. Stoudt,et al.  Precipitation and dissolution of δ and γ″ during heat treatment of a laser powder-bed fusion produced Ni-based superalloy , 2018, Scripta Materialia.

[5]  Mark R. Stoudt,et al.  Formation of the Ni3Nb δ-Phase in Stress-Relieved Inconel 625 Produced via Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing , 2017, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[6]  Lyle Levine,et al.  Measurements of Melt Pool Geometry and Cooling Rates of Individual Laser Traces on IN625 Bare Plates , 2020, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation.

[7]  R. M. Ward,et al.  Fluid and particle dynamics in laser powder bed fusion , 2018 .

[8]  Kamel Fezzaa,et al.  Keyhole threshold and morphology in laser melting revealed by ultrahigh-speed x-ray imaging , 2019, Science.

[9]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Simulation of TTT Curves for Additively Manufactured Inconel 625 , 2018, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[10]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Outcomes and Conclusions from the 2018 AM-Bench Measurements, Challenge Problems, Modeling Submissions, and Conference , 2020, Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation.

[11]  Mark R. Stoudt,et al.  Additively Manufactured Nitrogen-Atomized 17-4 PH Stainless Steel with Mechanical Properties Comparable to Wrought , 2019, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[12]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Power–Velocity Process Design Charts for Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .

[13]  L. Levine,et al.  Influence of Postbuild Microstructure on the Electrochemical Behavior of Additively Manufactured 17-4 PH Stainless Steel , 2017, JOM.

[14]  Michael F Toney,et al.  Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  J. Filliben USING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS IN FINITE ELEMENT MODELING TO IDENTIFY CRITICAL VARIABLES FOR LASER POWDER BED FUSION , 2015 .

[16]  Li Ma,et al.  Application of Finite Element, Phase-field, and CALPHAD-based Methods to Additive Manufacturing of Ni-based Superalloys. , 2017, Acta materialia.

[17]  Li Ma,et al.  Single-Track Melt-Pool Measurements and Microstructures in Inconel 625 , 2018, 1802.05827.

[18]  E. Lass,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of 17-4 PH Stainless Steel: Post-processing Heat Treatment to Achieve Uniform Reproducible Microstructure , 2015, JOM.

[19]  M. E. Williams,et al.  The Influence of Annealing Temperature and Time on the Formation of δ-Phase in Additively-Manufactured Inconel 625 , 2018, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[20]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Effect of heat treatment on the microstructural evolution of a nickel-based superalloy additive-manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. , 2018, Acta materialia.

[21]  Z. Hervier,et al.  Microstructural Evolutions During Thermal Aging of Alloy 625: Impact of Temperature and Forming Process , 2014, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[22]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications , 1988 .

[23]  Shawn Moylan,et al.  Thermographic Measurements of the Commercial Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process at NIST. , 2015, Rapid prototyping journal.

[24]  Kamel Fezzaa,et al.  Ultrafast X-ray imaging of laser–metal additive manufacturing processes , 2018, Journal of synchrotron radiation.