Quality assessment of immunological marker analysis and the immunological diagnosis in leukaemia and lymphoma: a multi‐centre study

Summary In order to standardize and assess the quality of immunophenotyping of leukaemias and lymphomas for diagnostic purposes, a cooperative study group in the Netherlands, SIHON, has formulated guidelines for the composition of antibody panels to be applied and guidelines for the interpretation of the marker analysis. To assess the value of these guidelines frozen cell samples of three patients with different haematological malignancies were sent to the 26 participating laboratories twice a year. Here we present the results with respect to the marker analysis and to the immunological diagnosis on 387 samples from 18 patients. A large inter‐laboratory variation was seen in the percentage of positive cells for each marker, which influenced the valuation of a marker to be discordant positive in up to 23% and discordant negative in up to 40%. No single major factor could be traced to explain the large variation in the results. However, probably due to the balanced composition of the antibody panel and to the application of the guidelines for interpretation, this variation did not much influence the agreement in immunological diagnosis. In only 13/387 samples (3.3%) differences in the percentage of positive cells caused disagreement in the final diagnosis. In 23 samples (5.9%) the disagreement was due to an incorrect application of the guidelines. Quantitative data of single observations obtained from different laboratories, in which the materials and methods are not standardized, cannot be compared; but standardization of guidelines for marker sets and for interpretation contributes to a high grade of agreement in immunological diagnosis.

[1]  E. Jaffe,et al.  My4 antibody staining of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. , 1991, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  J. Margolick,et al.  Quality control in the flow cytometric measurement of T-lymphocyte subsets: the multicenter AIDS cohort study experience. The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Group. , 1990, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[3]  S. Azen,et al.  Leukocyte immunophenotyping by flow cytometry in a multisite study: standardization, quality control, and normal values in the Transfusion Safety Study. The Transfusion Safety Study Group. , 1990, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[4]  C. E. van der Schoot,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies against myeloperoxidase are valuable immunological reagents for the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia , 1990, British journal of haematology.

[5]  S. Azen,et al.  Immunophenotyping in a multicenter study: the Transfusion Safety Study experience. , 1989, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[6]  A. Landay,et al.  Procedural guidelines for performing immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. , 1989, Clinical immunology and immunopathology.

[7]  B S Edwards,et al.  Comprehensive quality assessment approach for flow cytometric immunophenotyping of human lymphocytes. , 1989, Cytometry.

[8]  A. Landay,et al.  Identification and functional characterization of mononuclear cells by flow cytometry. , 1989, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[9]  D. Campana,et al.  The reliability of cytoplasmic CD3 and CD22 antigen expression in the immunodiagnosis of acute leukemia: a study of 500 cases. , 1989, Leukemia.

[10]  D. Barnett,et al.  Laboratory control of immunocytochemistry , 1989, European journal of haematology.

[11]  W. Knapp,et al.  CD antigens 1989. , 1989, Blood.

[12]  D. Boue,et al.  Expression and structure of CD22 in acute leukemia. , 1988, Blood.

[13]  H. van den Berghe Morphologic, immunologic and cytogenetic (MIC) working classification of the acute myeloid leukaemias , 1988 .

[14]  H. Berghe Morphologic, immunologic and cytogenetic (MIC) working classification of the acute myeloid leukaemias. Second MIC Cooperative Study Group. , 1988, British journal of haematology.

[15]  J. Dongen,et al.  Cytoplasmic expression of the CD3 antigen as a diagnostic marker for immature T-cell malignancies , 1988 .

[16]  A. Kuramoto,et al.  Flow cytometric analysis of peroxidase negative acute leukemias by monoclonal antibodies-II. Acute megakaryoblastic and acute promegakaryocytic leukemias , 1988 .

[17]  L Harvath,et al.  Quality control in clinical flow cytometry. , 1988, Pathology and immunopathology research.

[18]  A. McMichael Leucocyte typing III : white cell differentiation antigens , 1987 .

[19]  R. Berger,et al.  Phenotype of early erythroblastic leukemias. , 1986, Blood.

[20]  C. Anderson,et al.  Human leukocyte IgG Fc receptors. , 1986, Immunology today.

[21]  K. Foon,et al.  Immunologic classification of leukemia and lymphoma. , 1986, Blood.

[22]  M. Greaves,et al.  Lineage promiscuity in hemopoietic differentiation and leukemia. , 1986, Blood.

[23]  G. Marti,et al.  Normal human blood density gradient lymphocyte subset analysis: I. An interlaboratory flow cytometric comparison of 85 normal adults , 1985, American journal of hematology.

[24]  G. Pinkus,et al.  Expression of human B cell-associated antigens on leukemias and lymphomas: a model of human B cell differentiation. , 1984, Blood.

[25]  Weinstein,et al.  Surface marker analysis of acute myeloblastic leukemia: identification of differentiation-associated phenotypes. , 1983, Blood.

[26]  T. Lebien,et al.  CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF MONOCLONAL- ANTIBODY PHENOTYPING IN CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKAEMIA , 1982, The Lancet.