Effect of fabrication processes on mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites for 49 meter (160 foot) recreational yachts

Abstract Polymer composite materialsoffer high strength and stiffness to weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and total life cost reductions that appeal to the marine industry. The advantages of composite construction have led to their incorporation in U.S. yacht hull structures over 46 meters (150 feet) in length. In order to construct even larger hull structures, higher quality composites with a lower cost production techniques need to be developed. In this study, the effect of composite hull fabrication processes on mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced plastic(GFRP) composites is presented. Fabrication techniques used in this study are hand lay-up (HL), vacuum infusion (VI), and hybrid (HL+VI) processes. Mechanical property testing includes: tensile, compressive, and ignition loss sample analysis. Results demonstrate that the vacuum pressure implemented during composite fabrication has an effect on mechanical properties. The VI processed GFRP yields improved mechanical properties in tension/compression strengths and tensile modulus. The hybrid GFRP composites, however, failed in a sequential manor, due to dissimilar failure modes in the HL and VI processed sides. Fractography analysis was conducted to validate the mechanical property testing results

[1]  Albert W. Horsmon,et al.  Lightweight Composites for Heavy-Duty Solutions , 2001 .

[2]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Tensile properties of short-glass-fiber- and short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites , 2000 .

[3]  A. Long,et al.  Active control of the vacuum infusion process , 2007 .

[4]  Y. Grohens,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Composites Based on Low Styrene Emission Polyester Resins for Marine Applications , 2006 .

[5]  D. F. Adams,et al.  Influence of specimen gage length and loading method on the axial compressive strength of a unidirectional composite material , 1991 .

[6]  A. Chambers,et al.  Understanding the factors affecting the compressive testing of unidirectional carbon fibre composites , 2007 .

[7]  Anthony M. Waas,et al.  Compressive failure of composites, part I: Testing and micromechanical theories , 1996 .

[8]  James Thomason,et al.  The interface region in glass fibre-reinforced epoxy resin composites: 1. Sample preparation, void content and interfacial strength , 1995 .

[9]  Antonio Mancuso,et al.  Lay-up optimization for the hull of a racing sailing yacht , 2001 .

[10]  Jose Maria Kenny,et al.  Characterization of Composites Based on Natural and Glass Fibers Obtained by Vacuum Infusion , 2005 .

[11]  Sarah E. Mouring,et al.  Buckling and postbuckling of composite ship panels stiffened with preform frames , 1999 .

[12]  Adrian P. Mouritz,et al.  Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines , 2001 .

[13]  Byoung-Kwon Ahn,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies on super-cavitating flow of axisymmetric cavitators , 2010 .

[14]  Giovanni Belingardi,et al.  Repeated impact response of hand lay-up and vacuum infusion thick glass reinforced laminates , 2008 .

[15]  Mirabel Cerqueira Rezende,et al.  The influence of porosity on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon/epoxy and carbon/bismaleimide fabric laminates , 2001 .

[16]  C. Borsellino,et al.  Effect of Bonder at Skin/Core Interface on the Mechanical Performances of Sandwich Structures Used in Marine Industry , 2007 .