Low perceptual sensitivity to altered video speed in viewing a soccer match

When watching videos, our sense of reality is continuously challenged. How much can a fundamental dimension of experience such as visual flow be modified before breaking the perception of real time? Here we found a remarkable indifference to speed manipulations applied to a popular video content, a soccer match. In a condition that mimicked real-life TV watching, none of 100 naïve observers spontaneously noticed speed alterations up/down to 12%, even when asked to report motion anomalies, and showed very low sensitivity to video speed changes (Just Noticeable Difference, JND = 18%). When tested with a constant-stimuli speed discrimination task, JND was still high, though much reduced (9%). The presence of the original voice-over with compensation for pitch did not affect perceptual performance. Thus, our results document a rather broad tolerance to speed manipulations in video viewing, even under attentive scrutiny. This finding may have important implications. For example, it can validate video compression strategies based on sub-threshold temporal squeezing. This way, a soccer match can last only 80 min and still be perceived as natural. More generally, knowing the boundaries of natural speed perception may help to optimize the flow of artificial visual stimuli which increasingly surround us.

[1]  Ian M. Thornton,et al.  Anticipating action in complex scenes , 2004 .

[2]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding , 2005, Science.

[3]  Steve Sussman,et al.  Hidden addiction: Television , 2013, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[4]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[5]  Alessandro Moscatelli,et al.  Modeling psychophysical data at the population-level: the generalized linear mixed model. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[6]  D. Burr,et al.  Motion psychophysics: 1985–2010 , 2011, Vision Research.

[7]  Masahiro Takei,et al.  Human resource development and visualization , 2009, J. Vis..

[8]  R. Snowden,et al.  Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops , 1998, Nature.

[9]  P. Thompson,et al.  Human speed perception is contrast dependent , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Kevin R Brooks,et al.  Simulation of Driving in Low-Visibility Conditions: Does Stereopsis Improve Speed Perception? , 2015, Perception.

[12]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Foggy perception slows us down , 2012, eLife.

[13]  J. Norman,et al.  Aging and the Perception of Speed , 2003, Perception.

[14]  Karl R. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Robust Underestimation of Speed During Driving: A Field Study , 2015, Perception.

[15]  H. Hecht,et al.  Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Steven B. Most,et al.  What you see is what you set: sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. , 2005, Psychological review.

[17]  P. Viviani,et al.  Unfamiliar Walking Movements Are Detected Early in the Visual Stream: An fMRI Study. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Rebecca J Sharman,et al.  Visual adaptation alters the apparent speed of real-world actions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Felix Wichmann,et al.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Advancement of motion psychophysics: review 2001-2010. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[21]  Francesca Figliozzi,et al.  Detecting temporal reversals in human locomotion , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Zachary C. Burns,et al.  Slow motion increases perceived intent , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  W. Newsome,et al.  Correlation between Speed Perception and Neural Activity in the Middle Temporal Visual Area , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Juslin,et al.  Visual perception of dynamic properties: cue heuristics versus direct-perceptual competence. , 2000, Psychological review.

[25]  Hartwig K. Distler,et al.  Velocity Constancy in a Virtual Reality Environment , 1997, Perception.

[26]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  A psychology based approach for longitudinal development in cognitive robotics , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[27]  Justin L. Gardner,et al.  Cortical Correlates of Human Motion Perception Biases , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  V. Gallese,et al.  What is so special about embodied simulation? , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Influence of the size of the field of view on motion perception , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[30]  Daniel P. Bliss,et al.  Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Claudio de'Sperati,et al.  Assessing Self-Awareness through Gaze Agency , 2016, PloS one.

[32]  H. Wallach,et al.  On constancy of visual speed. , 1939 .

[33]  Francesco Lacquaniti,et al.  How long did it last? You would better ask a human , 2014, Front. Neurorobot..

[34]  Kevin Brownlow,et al.  Silent Films–What Was the Right Speed? , 1990 .