Lexical Processing and Sentence Context Effects

Publisher Summary This chapter presents a discussion on lexical processing and sentence context effects during reading. There are various sources of information that are realized within the printed letter string of an individual word that might influence lexical access such as word familiarity, word class, and lexical ambiguity. Word frequency effects have been demonstrated in virtually every standard measure of word recognition, including lexical decision. Lexical familiarity (as assessed by printed word frequency), age of acquisition, or subjective familiarity rating influence a reader's initial processing time on a word as measured by first fixation duration or gaze duration. Readers spend more time on less familiar than on more familiar words of equal length. One way of investigating the role of word meaning in lexical access is to compare reading behavior on words that differ in the degree to which they convey semantic content. Lexically ambiguous words possess multiple meanings associated with a single orthographic form and, as such, they afford unique opportunities to examine the role of word meaning in lexical access. Under this view, given sufficiently constraining context, access may be limited to the context appropriate meaning of the ambiguous word.

[1]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Word Recognition in a Functional Context: The Use of Scripts in Reading. , 1985 .

[2]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[4]  D E Meyer,et al.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. , 1976, Science.

[5]  J M Watson,et al.  Cross-modal semantic and homograph priming in healthy young, healthy old, and in Alzheimer's disease individuals , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[6]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Meaning , 2007 .

[7]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[8]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  The in ̄uence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words , 2000 .

[9]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. , 1985 .

[10]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[11]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  I. Fischler,et al.  Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .

[13]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance , 1987 .

[14]  M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Repeated homographs in word and sentence contexts: Multiple processing of multiple meanings. , 2001 .

[16]  W. Trammell Neill,et al.  3. Facilitatory and ihibitory aspects of attention , 1996 .

[17]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Kevin O’Regan,et al.  Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  J. Kevin O’Regan,et al.  The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[21]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. , 2001 .

[22]  D. Swinney,et al.  Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias , 1981 .

[23]  Katherine S. Binder,et al.  Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading , 1998 .

[24]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .

[26]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[27]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[28]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  G. Kellas,et al.  Strength of Discourse Context as a Determinant of the Subordinate Bias Effect , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  Susan A. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .

[31]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  J. Kroll,et al.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[33]  E. Tulving,et al.  STIMULUS INFORMATION AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION AS DETERMINANTS OF TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  D. Gorfein On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. , 2001 .

[35]  C. Burgess,et al.  Lexical and Sentence Context Effects in Word Recognition , 1989 .

[36]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Sequential masking during eye fixations in reading , 1987 .

[37]  A. Healy,et al.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  D. J. Foss A discourse on semantic priming , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Susan D. Lima,et al.  Morphological analysis in sentence reading , 1987 .

[40]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[41]  K. Rayner,et al.  Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .

[42]  G Kellas,et al.  Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: A reply to Binder and Rayner , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  David S. Gorfein An activation-selection view of homograph disambiguation: A matter of emphasis? , 2001 .

[44]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[45]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  S A Duffy,et al.  Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[48]  K. Rayner,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .

[49]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Katherine S Binder,et al.  Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: An eye movement examination , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[51]  R. E. Schuberth,et al.  Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[52]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Meaning Frequency on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations , 1992 .

[53]  Noel E. Sharkey,et al.  Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming , 1992 .

[54]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[55]  K. Rayner,et al.  The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. , 2001 .

[56]  Alan H. Kawamoto,et al.  Pronunciation of homographs , 1992 .

[57]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[58]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[60]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  G. Kambe,et al.  Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading , 2000 .

[63]  A W Inhoff,et al.  Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[65]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? , 1989 .

[66]  David J. Hess,et al.  Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension , 1995 .

[67]  K. Rayner,et al.  Expectations and Parafoveal Information in Reading: Comments on McClelland and O'Regan. , 1981 .

[68]  K. Rayner,et al.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  K. Rayner,et al.  Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition , 2004 .

[71]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995 .

[72]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[73]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds , 2004 .

[74]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew , 2005 .

[75]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[76]  Stephen Dopkins,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1992 .

[77]  I. Fischler,et al.  Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[78]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[79]  A. H. Kawamoto Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .

[80]  M. Gernsbacher Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[81]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  What happens to the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word in skilled reading , 2001 .

[82]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. , 1995 .

[83]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[84]  A. Koriat,et al.  The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors , 1994, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[85]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000 .

[86]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[87]  D. Zola Redundancy and word perception during reading , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[88]  G. Simpson Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity , 1981 .

[89]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[90]  J. Morton THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXT ON THE VISUAL DURATION THRESHOLD FOR WORDS. , 1964, British journal of psychology.

[91]  J. Folk,et al.  Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. , 1999 .

[92]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[93]  G. Mandler,et al.  INTERACTION OF TWO SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN TACHISTOSCOPIC WORD RECOGNITION. , 1964, Canadian journal of psychology.

[94]  G. Simpson,et al.  Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .

[95]  P. Dixon,et al.  Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[96]  S. Andrews,et al.  Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .

[97]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. , 1981 .

[98]  M. Masson Comprehension of rapidly presented sentences: The mind is quicker than the eye , 1986 .

[99]  J. Henderson,et al.  Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[100]  K. Rayner,et al.  Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[101]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[102]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Buffering new information during reading , 1989 .

[103]  G. Simpson,et al.  Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. , 1994 .

[104]  K. Rayner,et al.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.