Lexical Processing and Sentence Context Effects
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Noel E. Sharkey,et al. Word Recognition in a Functional Context: The Use of Scripts in Reading. , 1985 .
[2] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] K. Forster,et al. Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .
[4] D E Meyer,et al. Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. , 1976, Science.
[5] J M Watson,et al. Cross-modal semantic and homograph priming in healthy young, healthy old, and in Alzheimer's disease individuals , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[6] Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al. The Costs and Benefits of Meaning , 2007 .
[7] K. Rayner,et al. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .
[8] G. d'Ydewalle,et al. The in ̄uence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words , 2000 .
[9] Curt Burgess,et al. Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. , 1985 .
[10] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[11] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[12] I. Fischler,et al. Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .
[13] P. Tabossi,et al. Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance , 1987 .
[14] M. Slowiaczek,et al. Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[15] Greg B. Simpson,et al. Repeated homographs in word and sentence contexts: Multiple processing of multiple meanings. , 2001 .
[16] W. Trammell Neill,et al. 3. Facilitatory and ihibitory aspects of attention , 1996 .
[17] A Pollatsek,et al. Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[18] Kevin O’Regan,et al. Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[19] J. Kevin O’Regan,et al. The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.
[20] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.
[21] Patrizia Tabossi,et al. Methodological issues in the study of lexical ambiguity resolution. , 2001 .
[22] D. Swinney,et al. Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias , 1981 .
[23] Katherine S. Binder,et al. Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading , 1998 .
[24] Sarah J. White,et al. Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[25] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .
[26] Robin K. Morris,et al. Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[27] G. McConkie,et al. What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.
[28] Asher Koriat,et al. The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[29] G. Kellas,et al. Strength of Discourse Context as a Determinant of the Subordinate Bias Effect , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[30] Susan A. Duffy,et al. Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .
[31] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[32] J. Kroll,et al. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[33] E. Tulving,et al. STIMULUS INFORMATION AND CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION AS DETERMINANTS OF TACHISTOSCOPIC RECOGNITION OF WORDS. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.
[34] D. Gorfein. On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity. , 2001 .
[35] C. Burgess,et al. Lexical and Sentence Context Effects in Word Recognition , 1989 .
[36] Keith Rayner,et al. Sequential masking during eye fixations in reading , 1987 .
[37] A. Healy,et al. Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] D. J. Foss. A discourse on semantic priming , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[39] Susan D. Lima,et al. Morphological analysis in sentence reading , 1987 .
[40] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .
[41] K. Rayner,et al. Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .
[42] G Kellas,et al. Strength of context does modulate the subordinate bias effect: A reply to Binder and Rayner , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[43] David S. Gorfein. An activation-selection view of homograph disambiguation: A matter of emphasis? , 2001 .
[44] K. Rayner,et al. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[45] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.
[46] S A Duffy,et al. Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[47] Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al. Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .
[48] K. Rayner,et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .
[49] K. Rayner,et al. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[50] Katherine S Binder,et al. Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: An eye movement examination , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[51] R. E. Schuberth,et al. Effects of stimulus and contextual information on the lexical decision process , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[52] K. Rayner,et al. The Effect of Meaning Frequency on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations , 1992 .
[53] Noel E. Sharkey,et al. Weak contextual constraints in text and word priming , 1992 .
[54] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[55] K. Rayner,et al. The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. , 2001 .
[56] Alan H. Kawamoto,et al. Pronunciation of homographs , 1992 .
[57] Marie Bienkowski,et al. Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[58] D. Balota,et al. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.
[59] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[60] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] G. Kambe,et al. Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[62] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading , 2000 .
[63] A W Inhoff,et al. Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[64] Keith Rayner,et al. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[65] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? , 1989 .
[66] David J. Hess,et al. Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension , 1995 .
[67] K. Rayner,et al. Expectations and Parafoveal Information in Reading: Comments on McClelland and O'Regan. , 1981 .
[68] K. Rayner,et al. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[69] K. Rayner,et al. Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[70] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition , 2004 .
[71] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995 .
[72] J. Hyönä,et al. The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .
[73] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Morphological parsing and the use of segmentation cues in reading Finnish compounds , 2004 .
[74] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew , 2005 .
[75] D. Swinney. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .
[76] Stephen Dopkins,et al. Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1992 .
[77] I. Fischler,et al. Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[78] J. O'Regan,et al. Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.
[79] A. H. Kawamoto. Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .
[80] M. Gernsbacher. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[81] Robin K. Morris,et al. What happens to the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word in skilled reading , 2001 .
[82] Robin K. Morris,et al. Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. , 1995 .
[83] C. Fowler,et al. Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.
[84] A. Koriat,et al. The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors , 1994, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[85] A. Pollatsek,et al. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000 .
[86] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[87] D. Zola. Redundancy and word perception during reading , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[88] G. Simpson. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity , 1981 .
[89] Gary E. Raney,et al. Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[90] J. Morton. THE EFFECTS OF CONTEXT ON THE VISUAL DURATION THRESHOLD FOR WORDS. , 1964, British journal of psychology.
[91] J. Folk,et al. Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. , 1999 .
[92] C. Burgess,et al. Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.
[93] G. Mandler,et al. INTERACTION OF TWO SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN TACHISTOSCOPIC WORD RECOGNITION. , 1964, Canadian journal of psychology.
[94] G. Simpson,et al. Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .
[95] P. Dixon,et al. Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[96] S. Andrews,et al. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .
[97] V. M. Holmes,et al. Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative-clause sentences. , 1981 .
[98] M. Masson. Comprehension of rapidly presented sentences: The mind is quicker than the eye , 1986 .
[99] J. Henderson,et al. Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[100] K. Rayner,et al. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[101] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[102] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Buffering new information during reading , 1989 .
[103] G. Simpson,et al. Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. , 1994 .
[104] K. Rayner,et al. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.