Modulation transfer functions and contrast sensitivity through low vision telescopes.

Telescopes are coherently coupled to the eye. Because their wavefront aberrations may be altered by the optics of the eye, especially by accommodation, some researchers question the ability of their modulation transfer functions (MTF) to predict changes in contrast sensitivity functions (CSF) through them. We measured the CSFs of visually normal and aphakic subjects through telescopes. We found that MTF appears to be useful for ranking the telescopes, and accommodation appears to improve focus and partly balance wavefront errors. Our results suggest that cascading (multiplying the contrast of the instrumental MTF with the unaided CSF at each spatial frequency) is useful for predicting visually aided CSFs to within 4 dB.

[1]  B. J. Biddles,et al.  A workshop instrument for testing binocular and other sights using the m.t.f. criterion , 1972 .

[2]  Charman Wn,et al.  Effect of refractive error in visual tests with sinusoidal gratings. , 1979 .

[3]  A. Hardy,et al.  Evaluation of a Total System-optics Plus Operator , 1973 .

[4]  N. P. Barton,et al.  An Afocal-system OTF Test Standard , 1978 .

[5]  D S Loshin,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity: The Visual Rehabilitation of the Patient With Macular Degeneration , 1984 .

[6]  I Overington.  Interaction of vision with optical aids. , 1973, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  Michael K. Giles.  Grating Detectability: A Method to Evaluate Aberration Effects In Visual Instruments , 1979 .

[8]  Pantazis Mouroulis.  Contrast Sensitivity In The Assessment Of Visual Instruments , 1981, Other Conferences.

[9]  G. J. Burton.  Effects Of Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) And Phase Transfer Function (PTF) On Visual Performance , 1981, Other Conferences.

[10]  D. A. Owens.  A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings , 1980, Vision Research.

[11]  I. Overington,et al.  Remote Sensing of Earth Resources and the Environment-Proceedings of the S.P.I.E. , 1973 .

[12]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Spatial frequency dependence of accommodative responses in amblyopic eyes , 1983, Vision Research.

[13]  G. J. Burton.  Criteria For Testing Of Afocal Visual Instruments , 1981, Other Conferences.

[14]  G J Burton,et al.  Effects of wavefront aberration on visual instrument performance, and a consequential test technique. , 1987, Applied optics.

[15]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  W N Charman,et al.  Astigmatism, accommodation, and visual instrumentation. , 1978, Applied optics.

[17]  K E Higgins,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity. Importance of controlling the patient's visibility criterion. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  M. K. Giles.  Aberration tolerances for visual optical systems. , 1977, Journal of the Optical Society of America.