Nonnatural protein–protein interaction-pair design by key residues grafting

Protein–protein interface design is one of the most exciting fields in protein science; however, designing nonnatural protein–protein interaction pairs remains difficult. In this article we report a de novo design of a nonnatural protein–protein interaction pair by scanning the Protein Data Bank for suitable scaffold proteins that can be used for grafting key interaction residues and can form stable complexes with the target protein after additional mutations. Using our design algorithm, an unrelated protein, rat PLCδ1-PH (pleckstrin homology domain of phospholipase C-δ1), was successfully designed to bind the human erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) after grafting the key interaction residues of human erythropoietin binding to EPOR. The designed mutants of rat PLCδ1-PH were expressed and purified to test their binding affinities with EPOR. A designed triple mutation of PLCδ1-PH (ERPH1) was found to bind EPOR with high affinity (KD of 24 nM and an IC50 of 5.7 μM) both in vitro and in a cell-based assay, respectively, although the WT PLCδ1-PH did not show any detectable binding under the assay conditions. The in vitro binding affinities of the PLCδ1-PH mutants correlate qualitatively to the computational binding affinities, validating the design and the protein–protein interaction model. The successful practice of finding a proper protein scaffold and making it bind with EPOR demonstrates a prospective application in protein engineering targeting protein–protein interfaces.

[1]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. , 2001 .

[2]  W. Delano,et al.  Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface. , 2000, Science.

[3]  Weizhong Li,et al.  Grafting of Protein-Protein Interaction Epitope , 2000, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[4]  Luhua Lai,et al.  A combinatorial score to distinguish biological and nonbiological protein–protein interfaces , 2006, Proteins.

[5]  P. Sigler,et al.  Specific and high-affinity binding of inositol phosphates to an isolated pleckstrin homology domain. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Andrew M Wollacott,et al.  Virtual interaction profiles of proteins. , 2001, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[7]  M. Helmer-Citterich,et al.  SH3-SPOT: an algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  O. Dym,et al.  The modular architecture of protein-protein binding interfaces. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  F. Richards,et al.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[12]  B. Kobe,et al.  Structural basis and prediction of substrate specificity in protein serine/threonine kinases , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Nilges,et al.  The PH superfold: a structural scaffold for multiple functions. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[15]  D. Barber,et al.  Turning cells red: signal transduction mediated by erythropoietin. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[16]  Fenglou Mao,et al.  Potential of mean force for protein–protein interaction studies , 2002, Proteins.

[17]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[18]  P. Sigler,et al.  Structure of the high affinity complex of inositol trisphosphate with a phospholipase C pleckstrin homology domain , 1995, Cell.

[19]  V. Rybin,et al.  Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Favorable scaffolds: proteins with different sequence, structure and function may associate in similar ways. , 2005, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[22]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Structure-based method for analyzing protein–protein interfaces , 2004, Journal of molecular modeling.

[23]  Enrico A. Stura,et al.  Functional Mimicry of a Protein Hormone by a Peptide Agonist: The EPO Receptor Complex at 2.8 Å , 1996, Science.

[24]  D. Chang,et al.  Mapping of the active site of recombinant human erythropoietin. , 1997, Blood.

[25]  C. Chothia One thousand families for the molecular biologist , 1992, Nature.

[26]  T. Arakawa,et al.  Dimerization of the extracellular domain of the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor by EPO: one high-affinity and one low-affinity interaction. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[27]  I. Wilson,et al.  Shared and Unique Determinants of the Erythropoietin (EPO) Receptor Are Important for Binding EPO and EPO Mimetic Peptide* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  Z Liu,et al.  Construction of protein binding sites in scaffold structures. , 2000, Biopolymers.

[29]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Ronald W. Barrett,et al.  Small Peptides as Potent Mimetics of the Protein Hormone Erythropoietin , 1996, Science.

[31]  Eugene I Shakhnovich,et al.  Amino acids determining enzyme-substrate specificity in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein kinases , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  T. Wang,et al.  Differential association of the pleckstrin homology domains of phospholipases C-beta 1, C-beta 2, and C-delta 1 with lipid bilayers and the beta gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[34]  J. Cartron,et al.  The extracellular domain of the human erythropoietin receptor: expression as a fusion protein in Escherichia coli, purification, and biological properties. , 1999, Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology.

[35]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Electrostatics in computational protein design. , 2005, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[36]  L S Mulcahy,et al.  Identification of a 13 amino acid peptide mimetic of erythropoietin and description of amino acids critical for the mimetic activity of EMP1. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[37]  F M Richards,et al.  Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. II. Grafting of a buried transition metal binding site into Escherichia coli thioredoxin. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[39]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Wen He,et al.  An antagonist peptide–EPO receptor complex suggests that receptor dimerization is not sufficient for activation , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[41]  M. Tyers,et al.  Molecular cloning and expression of the major protein kinase C substrate of platelets , 1988, Nature.

[42]  Lin Jiang,et al.  Grafting of protein-protein binding sites , 2000 .

[43]  Robert M. Stroud,et al.  Efficiency of signalling through cytokine receptors depends critically on receptor orientation , 1998, Nature.

[44]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.