Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programmes and policy: protocol for a research programme on integrated knowledge translation

BackgroundHealth research is conducted with the expectation that it advances knowledge and eventually translates into improved health systems and population health. However, research findings are often caught in the know-do gap: they are not acted upon in a timely way or not applied at all. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) is advanced as a way to increase the relevance, applicability and impact of research. With IKT, knowledge users work with researchers throughout the research process, starting with identification of the research question. Knowledge users represent those who would be able to use research results to inform their decisions (e.g. clinicians, managers, policy makers, patients/families and others). Stakeholders are increasingly interested in the idea that IKT generates greater and faster societal impact. Stakeholders are all those who are interested in the use of research results but may not necessarily use them for their own decision-making (e.g. governments, funders, researchers, health system managers and policy makers, patients and clinicians). Although IKT is broadly accepted, the actual research supporting it is limited and there is uncertainty about how best to conduct and support IKT. This paper presents a protocol for a programme of research testing the assumption that engaging the users of research in phases of its production leads to (a) greater appreciation of and capacity to use research; (b) the production of more relevant, useful and applicable research that results in greater impact; and (c) conditions under which it is more likely that research results will influence policy, managerial and clinical decision-making.MethodsThe research programme will adopt an interdisciplinary, international, cross-sector approach, using multiple and mixed methods to reflect the complex and social nature of research partnerships. We will use ongoing and future natural IKT experiments as multiple cases to study IKT in depth, and we will take advantage of the team’s existing relationships with provincial, national and international organizations. Case studies will be retrospective and prospective, and the 7-year grant period will enable longitudinal studies. The initiation of partnerships, funding processes, the research lifecycle and then outcomes/impacts post project will be studied in real time. These living laboratories will also allow testing of strategies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the IKT approach.DiscussionThis is the first interdisciplinary, systematic and programmatic research study on IKT. The research will provide scientific evidence on how to reliably and validly measure collaborative research partnerships and their impacts. The proposed research will build the science base for IKT, assess its relationship with research use and identify best practices and appropriate conditions for conducting IKT to achieve the greatest impact. It will also train and mentor the next generation of IKT researchers.

[1]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[2]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Engaging Patients and Stakeholders in Research Proposal Review: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute , 2014, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  I. Graham,et al.  Research agenda for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in healthcare: what we know and do not yet know , 2016, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[4]  A. Kothari,et al.  Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration , 2011 .

[5]  Alan K Duncan,et al.  An In‐House Learning Laboratory for Patient‐Centered Innovation , 2009, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality.

[6]  Anita Kothari,et al.  A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. , 2013, Health policy.

[7]  J. Ward,et al.  Research engagement and outcomes in public health and health services research in Australia , 2009, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[8]  K. Walshe,et al.  Health research, development and innovation in England from 1988 to 2013: from research production to knowledge mobilization , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.

[9]  D. Russell,et al.  Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  Alison M. Hutchinson,et al.  Collaboration and Co-Production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges. , 2016, International journal of health policy and management.

[11]  I. Graham,et al.  Beyond "Two Cultures": Guidance for Establishing Effective Researcher/Health System Partnerships , 2016, International journal of health policy and management.

[12]  J. Denis,et al.  Creating a new articulation between research and practice through policy? The views and experiences of researchers and practitioners , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[13]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Knowledge Translation in Health Care , 2009 .

[14]  Mylène Tantchou Dipankui Collaboration Between Researchers and Knowledge Users in Health Technology Assessment: A Qualitative Exploratory Study , 2016, International journal of health policy and management.

[15]  J. Rycroft-Malone From Knowing to Doing — From the Academy to Practice: Comment on 'The Many Meanings of Evidence: Implications for the Translational Science Agenda in Healthcare' , 2014, International journal of health policy and management.

[16]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[17]  I. Graham,et al.  Theoretical foundations of dissemination and implementation leadership : a conceptual model for leadership development , 2014 .

[18]  I. Graham,et al.  Research funder required research partnerships: a qualitative inquiry , 2014, Implementation Science.

[19]  Whitney Berta,et al.  Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review , 2015, Implementation Science.

[20]  H. Scarbrough,et al.  The enactment of knowledge translation: a study of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care initiative within the English National Health Service , 2013, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy.

[21]  C. Keen,et al.  Supporting 'Best Research for Best Health' with best information. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[22]  J. Denis,et al.  Convergent evolution: The academic and policy roots of collaborative research , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[23]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[24]  Michael K Morgan,et al.  Academic health science centres in Australia: let's get competitive , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[25]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  The value and challenges of participatory research: strengthening its practice. , 2008, Annual review of public health.

[26]  Joyce E. Wilkinson,et al.  Collaborative action around implementation in Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: towards a programme theory , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.

[27]  Joanne Tucker,et al.  Understanding the performance and impact of public knowledge translation funding interventions: Protocol for an evaluation of Canadian Institutes of Health Research knowledge translation funding programs , 2012, Implementation Science.

[28]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[29]  K. Sibley,et al.  A descriptive qualitative examination of knowledge translation practice among health researchers in Manitoba, Canada , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[30]  J. Cooke,et al.  "Seeing" the Difference: The Importance of Visibility and Action as a Mark of "Authenticity" in Co-production , 2016, International journal of health policy and management.

[31]  Joyce E. Wilkinson,et al.  Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare , 2015, Implementation Science.

[32]  S. Straus,et al.  Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[33]  France Légaré,et al.  Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. , 2008, The Milbank quarterly.

[34]  Racha Fadlallah,et al.  A call for a backward design to knowledge translation. , 2015, International journal of health policy and management.

[35]  Anita Kothari,et al.  Defining Integrated Knowledge Translation and Moving Forward: A Response to Recent Commentaries , 2017, International journal of health policy and management.

[36]  S. Hinrichs,et al.  CLAHRCs in practice: combined knowledge transfer and exchange strategies, cultural change, and experimentation , 2013, Journal of health services research & policy.

[37]  A. Macaulay,et al.  Community-Based Participatory Research: Lessons From Sharing Results With the Community: Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project , 2007, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[38]  Published Online Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste , 2014 .

[39]  Sarah Bowen,et al.  Backwards design or looking sideways? knowledge translation in the real world Comment on "A call for a backward design to knowledge translation". , 2015, International journal of health policy and management.

[40]  M. Dobrow,et al.  Identifying the conditions needed for integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care organizations: qualitative interviews with researchers and research users , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[41]  A. Tricco,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol , 2016, BMJ Open.

[42]  Craig Mitton,et al.  Reflecting on backward design for knowledge translation Comment on "A call for a backward design to knowledge translation". , 2015, International journal of health policy and management.

[43]  I. Graham Turning knowledge into action : practical guidance on how to do integrated knowledge translation research / edited by Ian D. Graham, Jacqueline M. Tetroe, Alan Pearson. , 2014 .

[44]  D. Levac,et al.  Scoping studies: advancing the methodology , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[45]  R. Wiechula,et al.  Clinical placement and case study methodology: a complex affair. , 2012, Nurse education today.

[46]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[47]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice , 2012, The Milbank quarterly.

[48]  H. Gainforth,et al.  The role of interpersonal communication in the process of knowledge mobilization within a community-based organization: a network analysis , 2014, Implementation Science.

[49]  A. Woodend,et al.  Developing leadership capacity for guideline use: a pilot cluster randomized control trial. , 2013, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[50]  C. Adair,et al.  Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.

[51]  B. Holmes,et al.  Translating evidence into practice: the role of health research funders , 2012, Implementation Science.

[52]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[53]  Colorado Immersion Training in Community Engagement: Because You Can’t Study What You Don’t Know , 2014, Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action.

[54]  S. Straus,et al.  Knowledge translation in health care : moving from evidence to practice , 2009 .

[55]  Alberta Innovates Health Solutions , 2018, The Grants Register 2019.

[56]  I. Graham,et al.  From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[57]  Mona Nasser,et al.  What are funders doing to minimise waste in research? , 2017, The Lancet.

[58]  C. Wathen,et al.  Evaluation of partnerships in a transnational family violence prevention network using an integrated knowledge translation and exchange model: a mixed methods study , 2014, Health Research Policy and Systems.