Proximity, knowledge transfer, and innovation in technology-based mergers and acquisitions

This paper presents the findings from a qualitative study on the extent to which three dimensions of proximity – geographic, cognitive, and organisational – impact knowledge transfer and innovation post-merger and acquisition (M&A). Findings show that the elements of proximity substantially influence both knowledge transfer and innovation although the nature of the impact varies and is influenced by the type of management interventions or lack thereof post-M&A.

[1]  P. Puranam,et al.  What They Know vs. What They Do: How Acquirers Leverage Technology Acquisitions , 2007 .

[2]  Frances Cairncross,et al.  The death of distance , 1997 .

[3]  H. Barkema,et al.  International Expansion Through Start-Up or Acquisition: A Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[4]  K. Dickson.  How informal can you be? Trust and reciprocity within co–operative and collaborative relationships , 2014 .

[5]  Michel Ferrary,et al.  Managing the disruptive technologies life cycle by externalising the research: social network and corporate venturing in the Silicon Valley , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[6]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[7]  Simon Kuznets,et al.  Modern Economic Growth. Rate, Structure, and Spread. , 1967 .

[8]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[9]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[10]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[11]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Complementary Technologies, Knowledge Relatedness, and Invention Outcomes in High Technology Mergers and Acquisitions , 2009 .

[12]  P. Ensign.  Knowledge Sharing among Scientists: Why Reputation Matters for R&D in Multinational Firms , 2009 .

[13]  A. Torre,et al.  Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? , 1999 .

[14]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[15]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[16]  Geert Duysters,et al.  The Effect of Mergers and Acquisitions on the Technological Performance of Companies in a High-tech Environment , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[17]  Hugo Tschirky,et al.  Integration Planning for Technology Intensive Acquisitions , 2004 .

[18]  Sajjad M. Jasimuddin,et al.  Exploring knowledge transfer mechanisms: The case of a UK-based group within a high-tech global corporation , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[20]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[21]  David R. King,et al.  Meta-analyses of Post-acquisition Performance: Indications of Unidentified Moderators , 2004 .

[22]  Colin Sharp.  Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.) , 2003 .

[23]  Deepak K. Datta.  Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[24]  K. Arrow.  Classificatory Notes on the Production and Transmission of Technological Knowledge , 1969 .

[25]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Success and Failure in Technology Acquisitions: Lessons for Buyers and Sellers , 2010 .

[28]  Björn Ambos,et al.  The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations , 2009 .

[29]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Merging without alienating: interventions promoting cross-cultural organizational integration and their limitations , 2015 .

[30]  Christophe Sierra,et al.  The Internationalisation of R&D by Multinationals: A Trade-off between External and Internal Proximity , 1999 .

[31]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment , 1995 .

[32]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Integrating technology into merger and acquisition decision making , 1998 .

[33]  L. Capron.  The long‐term performance of horizontal acquisitions , 1999 .

[34]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries , 2006 .

[35]  Luc Soete,et al.  Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity , 1988 .

[36]  Annette L. Ranft.  Knowledge preservation and transfer during post-acquisition integration , 2006 .

[37]  Richard Leifer,et al.  Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts , 2000 .

[38]  M. Lubatkin.  Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm. , 1983 .

[39]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[40]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[41]  Lisa Harris,et al.  Testing goodwill: conflict and cooperation in new product development networks , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[42]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring new knowledge - The role of retaining human capital in acquisitions of high-tech firms , 2000 .

[43]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[44]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Impact of Acquisitions on Innovation: Poison Pill, Placebo, or Tonic? , 2005 .

[45]  P. Rosenzweig.  Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal , 1991 .

[46]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Thinking along: a process for tapping into knowledge across boundaries , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[47]  Lars Schweizer.  ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION OF ACQUIRED BIOTECHNOLOGY COMPANIES INTO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES: THE NEED FOR A HYBRID APPROACH , 2005 .

[48]  J. Christensen.  Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[49]  John Cantwell,et al.  Innovation and location in the multinational firm , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[50]  K. Eisenhardt.  Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigor and Comparative Logic , 1991 .

[51]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[52]  M. C. Jensen.  Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences , 1988 .

[53]  Prescott C. Ensign,et al.  Innovation in the multinational firm with globally dispersed r&d: Technological knowledge utilization and accumulation , 1999 .

[54]  Fredrik Hacklin,et al.  An evolutionary perspective on convergence: inducing a stage model of inter-industry innovation , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[55]  Melissa E. Graebner.  Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms , 2004 .

[56]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Corporate Acquisitions: A Process Perspective , 1986 .

[57]  Geert Duysters.  Collaboration and innovation: a review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation , 2006 .

[58]  Winston M. Tellis,et al.  APPLICATION OF A CASE STUDY METHODOLOGY , 1997 .

[59]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[60]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[61]  Wan Yu Chen,et al.  Fostering knowledge sharing through human resource management in R&D teams , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[62]  P. Desrochers,et al.  Geographical Proximity and the Transmission of Tacit Knowledge , 2001 .