Aviation Transportation, Cyber Threats, and Network-of-Networks: Modeling Perspectives for Translating Theory to Practice

Understanding aviation transportation infrastructure system behavior and coupling with communication networks is essential for securing and restoring functionality against cyber-enabled threats. While significant progress has been made in the past decade on developing infrastructure resilience theories based on network structure and operations, translating and generalizing them to real-world practice has often been challenging due to imperfect data and inapplicability of modeling assumptions. These typically include: 1) stylized network structures without uncertainty, 2) node homogeneity, 3) static criticality measures, and 4) unrealistic cascade models originating from single points of failure. This paper presents the modeling perspectives and approaches that aim to address these theory-to-practice challenges using a well-grounded network-of-networks (NoN) construct. Real-world modeling challenges are identified and a network theory-guided conceptual NoN model is developed that may be operationalized with the U.S. national airspace system airport network and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) communication network as an application domain.

[1]  Rami Puzis,et al.  Finding the most prominent group in complex networks , 2007, AI Commun..

[2]  H. Stanley,et al.  Breakdown of interdependent directed networks , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation , 2015, Nature.

[4]  Auroop R. Ganguly,et al.  Resilience of the U.S. National Airspace System Airport Network , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[6]  Game Theory and Uncertainty Quantification for Cyber Defense Applications , .

[7]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[8]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Universal resilience patterns in complex networks , 2016, Nature.

[9]  Fei Tan,et al.  The robust-yet-fragile nature of interdependent networks , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  A. Ganguly,et al.  Network Science Based Quantification of Resilience Demonstrated on the Indian Railways Network , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Mahantesh Halappanavar,et al.  Accelerating the mining of influential nodes in complex networks through community detection , 2016, Conf. Computing Frontiers.

[12]  Mark Rice,et al.  Towards Efficient N-x Contingency Selection Using Group betweenness Centrality , 2012, 2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis.

[13]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[14]  Ramakrishna Tipireddy,et al.  Quantifying mixed uncertainties in cyber attacker payoffs , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST).

[15]  Kushal Mukherjee,et al.  Statistical Mechanics-Inspired Modeling of Heterogeneous Packet Transmission in Communication Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[16]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Identifying sets of key players in a social network , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.