Evidence of an Intelligent Tutoring System as a Mindtool to Promote Strategic Memory of Expository Texts and Comprehension With Children in Grades 4 and 5

Reading and comprehending content area texts require learners to effectively select and encode with hierarchically strategic memory structures in order to combine new information with prior knowledge. Unfortunately, evidence from state and national tests shows that children fail to successfully navigate the reading comprehension challenges they face. Schools have struggled to find approaches that can help children succeed in this important task. Typical instruction in classrooms across the country has focused on procedural application of strategies or content-focused approaches that encourage rich discussions. Both approaches have achieved success but have limitations-related transparency and specificity of scaffolds and guidance for the teacher and learner in today’s diverse and complex classroom settings. The text structure strategy combines content and strategy to provide pragmatic, transparent, and scaffolded instruction addressing these challenges. A web-based intelligent tutoring system for the text structure strategy, named ITSS, was designed and developed to provide consistent and high-quality instruction to learners in Grades 4 and 5 about how to read, select main ideas, encode strategic memory structures, make inferences, and monitor comprehension during reading. In this article, we synthesize results from two recent large-scale randomized controlled studies to showcase how the ITSS supports selection and encoding of students’ strategic memory structures and how prior knowledge affects the memory structures. We provide greater depth of information about such processing than examined and reported in extant literature about overall increases in reading comprehension resulting from students using ITSS.

[1]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[2]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Web-Based Text Structure Strategy Instruction Improves Seventh Graders’ Content Area Reading Comprehension , 2017 .

[3]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: a synthesis of 20 years of research , 2010, Reading and writing.

[4]  L. Mason Teaching Students Who Struggle With Learning to Think Before, While, and After Reading: Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instruction , 2013 .

[5]  J. Graham,et al.  Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Frederick Reif Applying Cognitive Science to Education: Thinking and Learning in Scientific and Other Complex Domains , 2008 .

[7]  Simonne Pollini,et al.  Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction , 2009 .

[8]  B. Meyer,et al.  Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aid of older adult tutors. , 2002 .

[9]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial Examining Intelligent Tutoring of Structure Strategy for Fifth-Grade Readers , 2014 .

[10]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[11]  P. van den Broek,et al.  A cognitive account of discourse understanding and discourse interpretation: The Landscape Model of reading , 2011 .

[12]  Jason L. Anthony,et al.  An Evaluation of Intensive Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Effects of Structure Strategy Training and Signaling on Recall of Text. , 2001 .

[14]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Web-Based Tutoring of the Structure Strategy With or Without Elaborated Feedback or Choice for Fifth- and Seventh-Grade Readers , 2010 .

[15]  R. Slavin,et al.  Effective Reading Programs for Middle and High Schools: A Best‐Evidence Synthesis , 2008 .

[16]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Large-scale randomized controlled trial with 4th graders using intelligent tutoring of the structure strategy to improve nonfiction reading comprehension , 2012 .

[17]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The role of computer tools in experts' solving ill-structured problems , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  R. Pea Beyond Amplification : Using the Computer to Reorganize Mental Functioning , 1985 .

[19]  B. Meyer Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students. , 1980 .

[20]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Reading Comprehension Instruction: Focus on Content or Strategies? , 2009 .

[21]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[23]  David N. Rapp,et al.  Integrating Memory-Based and Constructionist Processes in Accounts of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[24]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Text Coherence and Readability , 2003 .

[25]  B. Meyer The organization of prose and its effects on memory , 1975 .

[26]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  iSTART: A Web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. , 2007 .

[27]  Esther Geva,et al.  The Reading Crisis: Why Poor Children Fall Behind. , 1993 .

[28]  Talbot County,et al.  The Common Core State Standards , 2013 .

[29]  Danielle S. McNamara Reading comprehension strategies : theories, interventions, and technologies , 2007 .

[30]  Cathy Collins Block,et al.  Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices , 2001 .