The Work‐related Quality of Life Scale for Higher Education Employees

Abstract Previous research suggests that higher education employees experience comparatively high levels of job stress. A range of instruments, both generic and job‐specific, has been used to measure stressors and strains in this occupational context. The Work‐related Quality of Life (WRQoL) scale is a measure designed to capture perceptions of the working environment and employees’ responses to them. This study explores the factor structure of the WRQoL scale for higher education employees. Survey data were collected from workers in four higher education institutions in the UK (n = 2136). Confirmatory factor analysis methods were used to investigate the explanatory power of the scale using a six‐factor model (job and career satisfaction, general well‐being, home–work interface, stress at work, control at work and working conditions). A first‐order confirmatory factor analysis model fitted the data well, whilst a second‐order model produced an acceptable fit. Levels of WRQoL for each factor are consistent with those found in other studies of academic employees. Overall, higher education employees in the sample are dissatisfied with their jobs and careers, are generally dissatisfied with working conditions and control at work and report they are stressed at work. Results provide evidence to support the use of the WRQoL psychometric instrument as both a multidimensional and uni‐dimensional measure to assess the quality of working life of employees in higher education.

[1]  Russell Kinman,et al.  The Well‐being of the UK Academy, 1998–2004 , 2006 .

[2]  R. Burke,et al.  Occupational stress and job satisfaction among physicians: sex differences. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[3]  T. E. Dinero.  Scale development. , 1996, Journal of health & social policy.

[4]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[5]  M. Joseph Sirgy,et al.  The effects of personal alienation on organizational identification: A quality-of-work-life model , 1991 .

[6]  F. Jones,et al.  Stress: Myth, Theory and Research , 2001 .

[7]  Chester M. Pierce,et al.  Stress in the workplace. , 1988 .

[8]  Linda Werfelman.  Working to the limit , 2008 .

[9]  M. Sirgy,et al.  A New Measure of Quality of Work Life (QWL) Based on Need Satisfaction and Spillover Theories , 2001 .

[10]  J. A. Edwards,et al.  The Work-Related Quality of Life scale for healthcare workers. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  C. Webb,et al.  Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: a comparative study of all staff categories , 2005 .

[12]  J. Cook,et al.  Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well‐being , 1979 .

[13]  W. Balzer,et al.  ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING THE LENGTH OF SELF‐REPORT SCALES , 2002 .

[14]  R. Bhagat,et al.  Organizational Stress, Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: Where Do We Go From Here? , 1992 .

[15]  K. Loscocco,et al.  Influences on the quality of work and nonwork life: Two decades in review , 1991 .

[16]  Psychosocial Working Conditions in Britain in 2007 , 2007 .

[17]  Steven J. Kass,et al.  State-Trait Boredom: Relationship to Absenteeism, Tenure, and Job Satisfaction , 2001 .

[18]  J. Saebel,et al.  Update on National University Stress Study , 2008 .

[19]  Chris Kelly,et al.  ‘Management Standards’ work-related stress in the UK: practical development , 2004 .

[20]  Tackling stress in higher, further, adult and prison education , 2008 .

[21]  C. Cooper,et al.  Stress and Employer Liability , 2001 .

[22]  J. A. Edwards,et al.  Psychometric analysis of the UK Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool , 2008 .

[23]  Li‐fang Zhang.  Teaching Styles and Occupational Stress among Chinese University Faculty Members , 2007 .