Maximizing noise energy for noise-masking studies

Noise-masking experiments are widely used to investigate visual functions. To be useful, noise generally needs to be strong enough to noticeably impair performance, but under some conditions, noise does not impair performance even when its contrast approaches the maximal displayable limit of 100 %. To extend the usefulness of noise-masking paradigms over a wider range of conditions, the present study developed a noise with great masking strength. There are two typical ways of increasing masking strength without exceeding the limited contrast range: use binary noise instead of Gaussian noise or filter out frequencies that are not relevant to the task (i.e., which can be removed without affecting performance). The present study combined these two approaches to further increase masking strength. We show that binarizing the noise after the filtering process substantially increases the energy at frequencies within the pass-band of the filter given equated total contrast ranges. A validation experiment showed that similar performances were obtained using binarized-filtered noise and filtered noise (given equated noise energy at the frequencies within the pass-band) suggesting that the binarization operation, which substantially reduced the contrast range, had no significant impact on performance. We conclude that binarized-filtered noise (and more generally, truncated-filtered noise) can substantially increase the energy of the noise at frequencies within the pass-band. Thus, given a limited contrast range, binarized-filtered noise can display higher energy levels than Gaussian noise and thereby widen the range of conditions over which noise-masking paradigms can be useful.

[1]  Manoj Raghavan,et al.  Sources of visual noise , 1995 .

[2]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[3]  G. Malerba,et al.  An Interleukin 13 Polymorphism Is Associated with Symptom Severity in Adult Subjects with Ever Asthma , 2016, PloS one.

[4]  Alex S. Baldwin,et al.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  Rémy Allard,et al.  Zero-dimensional noise is not suitable for characterizing processing properties of detection mechanisms. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[6]  Rémy Allard,et al.  To characterize contrast detection, noise should be extended, not localized , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[7]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing observers using external noise and observer models: assessing internal representations with external noise. , 2008, Psychological review.

[8]  B. Julesz,et al.  Spatial-frequency masking in vision: critical bands and spread of masking. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Ideal Observer Theory , 2009 .

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Rémy Allard,et al.  Motion processing: the most sensitive detectors differ in temporally localized and extended noise , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  D. Kersten,et al.  Ideal observers and efficiency: commemorating 50 years of Tanner and Birdsall: introduction. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Different processing strategies underlie voluntary averaging in low and high noise. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[14]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Crowding in a detection task: External noise triggers change in processing strategy , 2011, Vision Research.

[15]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  C W Tyler,et al.  Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[17]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B Julesz,et al.  Masking in Visual Recognition: Effects of Two-Dimensional Filtered Noise , 1973, Science.

[20]  Rémy Allard,et al.  The noisy-bit method for digital displays: Converting a 256 luminance resolution into a continuous resolution , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[21]  Rémy Allard,et al.  Contrast sensitivity, healthy aging and noise , 2013, Vision Research.

[22]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Editorial: Using Noise to Characterize Vision , 2015, Front. Psychol..