Dosimetric Comparison of Intraoperative Radiotherapy and SRS for Liver Metastases

Purpose/Objectives To perform a dosimetric comparison between kilovoltage intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) simulating both deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) modalities for patients with liver metastases. Methods/Materials Diagnostic computed tomographies (CT) of patients carrying one or two lesions <4 cm and who underwent surgery were retrospectively screened and randomly selected for the study. For DIBH-SRS, a gross target volume (GTV) plus planning target volume (PTV) were delineated. For FB-SRS, a GTV plus an internal target volume (ITV) and PTV were defined. Accounting for the maximal GTV diameters, a modified GTV (GTV-IORT) was expanded circumferentially to simulate a resection cavity. The best suitable round-applicator size was thereafter selected. All treatment plans were calculated homogeneously to deliver 40 Gy. Doses delivered to organs at risk (OAR) and target volumes were compared for IORT vs. both SRS modalities. Results Eight patients encompassing 10 lesions were included in the study. The mean liver volume was 2,050.97 cm3 (SD, 650.82), and the mean GTV volume was 12.23 cm3 (SD, 12.62). As for target structures, GTV-IORT [19.44 cm3 (SD, 17.26)] were significantly smaller than both PTV DIBH-SRS [30.74 cm3 (SD, 24.64), p = 0.002] and PTV FB-SRS [75.82 cm3 (SD, 45.65), p = 0.002]. The median applicator size was 3 cm (1.5–4.5), and the mean IORT simulated delivery time was 45.45 min (SD, 19.88). All constraints were met in all modalities. Liver V9.1 showed significantly smaller volumes with IORT [63.39 cm3 (SD, 35.67)] when compared to DIBH-SRS [150.12 cm3 (SD, 81.43), p = 0.002] or FB-SRS [306.13 cm3 (SD, 128.75), p = 0.002]. No other statistical or dosimetrically relevant difference was observed for stomach, spinal cord, or biliary tract. Mean IORT D90 was 85.3% (SD, 6.05), whereas D95 for DIBH-SRS and FB-SRS were 99.03% (SD, 1.71; p = 0.042) and 98.04% (SD, 3.46; p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion Kilovoltage IORT bears the potential as novel add-on treatment for resectable liver metastases, significantly reducing healthy liver exposure to radiation in comparison to SRS. Prospective clinical evidence is required to confirm this hypothesis.

[1]  G. Landry,et al.  Comparison of liver exposure in CT-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy versus SBRT in hepatocellular carcinoma , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[2]  F. Bamberg,et al.  Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Suitable for Transarterial Chemoembolization (HERACLES: HEpatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic RAdiotherapy CLinical Efficacy Study) , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[3]  P. Wust,et al.  Radiotherapeutic treatment options for oligotopic malignant liver lesions , 2021, Radiation oncology.

[4]  R. Hannan,et al.  Long Term Results of a Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial and Subsequent Institutional Experience of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases , 2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

[5]  N. Gusani,et al.  Epidemiology of liver metastases. , 2020, Cancer epidemiology.

[6]  S. Kropf,et al.  Comparative analysis between interstitial brachytherapy and stereotactic body irradiation for local ablation in liver malignancies. , 2019, Brachytherapy.

[7]  Chao Huang,et al.  Comparative Efficacy of Preoperative, Postoperative, and Perioperative Treatments for Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Network Meta-Analysis , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..

[8]  P. Gibbs,et al.  Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial , 2019, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  F. Giuliante,et al.  The impact of R1 resection for colorectal liver metastases on local recurrence and overall survival in the era of modern chemotherapy: An analysis of 1,428 resection areas , 2019, Surgery.

[10]  E. Koay,et al.  Radiation-Induced Liver Disease and Modern Radiotherapy. , 2018, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[11]  B. Emami,et al.  Intraoperative Radiotherapy With INTRABEAM: Technical and Dosimetric Considerations , 2018, Front. Oncol..

[12]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[13]  T. Pawlik,et al.  Impact of Surgical Margin Width on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following R0 Hepatic Resection of Colorectal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Jiahong Dong,et al.  Comparison of Anatomical and Nonanatomical Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis of 5207 Patients , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[15]  T. Solberg,et al.  A Phase I Dose-Escalation Trial of Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  R. Adam,et al.  R1 Resection by Necessity for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is It Still a Contraindication to Surgery? , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[17]  T. Pawlik,et al.  Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: resection determines outcome. , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[18]  A. de Laat,et al.  Network meta-analysis. , 2017, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  Daniel T Chang,et al.  Central liver toxicity after SBRT: An expanded analysis and predictive nomogram. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.