Event-related potential correlates of item and source memory strength

Event-related potential (ERP) studies of recognition memory have shown dissociations between item recognition and source memory, wherein item recognition is associated with the mid-frontal FN400 component, which varies continuously with item memory strength, while source memory is associated with the late parietal effect (LPC). There is current debate about whether source memory can vary along a continuum of memory strength or is a threshold process. The LPC has been shown to be generally sensitive to correct versus incorrect source judgments, but varying levels of "source strength" along a single dimension of source evidence have not been tested. The current experiment had participants encode novel visual objects in one of two different task contexts by performing either a conceptual or perceptual judgment about the object. On a subsequent memory test, participants made an old/new decision on a 4-point confidence scale followed by a source memory confidence judgment, in which they indicated their confidence about which task they had performed with the object at encoding. ERPs from the memory test were examined for electrophysiological correlates of both item and source memory strength. Item memory was associated with differences in the 300-500 ms time window, consistent with the timing of the FN400. Differences in the amplitude of the LPC were observed between correct and incorrect source decisions, consistent with previous findings. Comparing low and high confidence source decisions also revealed differences, suggesting that the LPC is also sensitive to variations in the strength of source memory.

[1]  A. Yonelinas Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  E. L. Wilding,et al.  Erratum: An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. (Brain (1996) 119 (889-905) , 1996 .

[3]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Electrophysiological Measures of Familiarity Memory , 2006, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[4]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[5]  E. Wilding In what way does the parietal ERP old/new effect index recollection? , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[7]  Jason L Hicks,et al.  The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[9]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[10]  Peter E. Wais fMRI signals associated with memory strength in the medial temporal lobes: A meta-analysis , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Dunn Remember-know: a matter of confidence. , 2004, Psychological review.

[13]  Yonelinas,et al.  Noncriterial Recollection: Familiarity as Automatic, Irrelevant Recollection , 1996, Consciousness and cognition.

[14]  John T. Wixted,et al.  Spotlighting the Probative Findings: Reply to Parks and Yonelinas (2007). , 2007 .

[15]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  T. Curran Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The relationship between electrophysiological correlates of recollection and amount of information retrieved , 2006, Brain Research.

[18]  John T Wixted,et al.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  M. Phillips,et al.  Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for varied recollection during source monitoring. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  An Electrophysiological Signature of Unconscious Recognition Memory , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  E L Wilding,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[23]  Scott D. Slotnick,et al.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[24]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[27]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural correlates of conceptual implicit memory and their contamination of putative neural correlates of explicit memory. , 2007, Learning & memory.

[28]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory , 1998, Nature.

[29]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Memory for words and novel visual patterns: repetition, recognition, and encoding effects in the event-related brain potential. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[30]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Colleen M. Parks,et al.  Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: comment on Wixted (2007). , 2007, Psychological review.

[32]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[33]  John T Wixted,et al.  A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Validating neural correlates of familiarity , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  John T Wixted,et al.  Recollection Is a Continuous Process , 2009, Psychological science.

[36]  E. Lettich,et al.  Modified Nomenclature for the “10%” Electrode System1 , 1988 .

[37]  K. Norman,et al.  Memory Strength and Repetition Suppression: Multimodal Imaging of Medial Temporal Cortical Contributions to Recognition , 2005, Neuron.

[38]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  A P Shimamura,et al.  On the recollection of specific- and partial-source information. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  John T Wixted,et al.  Activity in the Medial Temporal Lobe Predicts Memory Strength, Whereas Activity in the Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Recollection , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Edward L. Wilding,et al.  The Influence of Criterion Shifts on Electrophysiological Correlates of Recognition Memory , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.