Copy Alert: A Method and Metric to Detect Visual Copycat Brands

The authors propose a method and metric to quantify the consumer confusion between leading brands and copycat brands that results from the visual similarity of their packaging designs. The method has three components. First, image processing techniques establish the objective similarity of the packages of leading and copycat brands on the basis of their colors and textures. Second, a perceptual decision task (triangle test) assesses the accuracy and speed with which consumers can identify differences between brands from rapidly (300 milliseconds) flashed images of their packages. Third, a competing accumulator model describes the buildup of evidence on each of the alternative brands during consumers’ perceptual decisions and predicts the accuracy and response time of brand identification. Jointly, these components establish the impact of copycat packaging's visual features on consumer confusion. The method is applied in a test of experimentally designed copycats and market copycats in 15 product categories. A three-tiered metric (“copy alert,” “copy watch,” and “copy safe”) establishes the extent to which copycat brands imitate the package designs of target brands and identifies which visual features are responsible.

[1]  John M. Ennis,et al.  THE POWER OF SENSORY DISCRIMINATION METHODS REVISITED , 2011 .

[2]  Masaaki Kubo Image retrieval by edge features using higher order autocorrelation in a SOM environment , 2003 .

[3]  R. Netemeyer,et al.  Brand Dilution: When Do New Brands Hurt Existing Brands? , 2006 .

[4]  R. Bird The Impact of the Moseley Decision on Trademark Dilution Law , 2007 .

[5]  Linda G. Shapiro,et al.  Computer Vision , 2001 .

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Ming-Hui Chen,et al.  Computing marginal likelihoods from a single MCMC output , 2005 .

[8]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Eye Fixations on Advertisements and Memory for Brands: A Model and Findings , 2000 .

[9]  R. Tian The Psychology behind Trademark Infringement and Counterfeiting , 2008 .

[10]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Does In-Store Marketing Work? Effects of the Number and Position of Shelf Facings on Brand Attention and Evaluation at the Point of Purchase , 2009 .

[12]  Rik Pieters,et al.  When High-Similarity Copycats Lose and Moderate-Similarity Copycats Gain: The Impact of Comparative Evaluation , 2012 .

[13]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  An efficient color representation for image retrieval , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Ralf van der Lans,et al.  Research Note - Competitive Brand Salience , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[15]  R. Pieters,et al.  Looking more or less alike: Determinants of perceived visual similarity between copycat and leading brands , 2010 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoffs , 2002 .

[17]  George Miaoulis,et al.  Consumer Confusion & Trademark Infringement , 1978 .

[18]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  “Not Manufactured or Authorized by …”: Recent Federal Cases Involving Trademark Disclaimers , 1998 .

[19]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  An electrophysiological signature of summed similarity in visual working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[21]  J. Leroy Folks,et al.  The Inverse Gaussian Distribution , 1989 .

[22]  Jean-Noël Kapferer,et al.  Brand Confusion: Empirical Study of a Legal Concept , 1995 .

[23]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  Trademark Dilution: Empirical Measures for an Elusive Concept , 2000 .

[24]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[25]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[26]  M. Lee,et al.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[27]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  Sincere Flattery: Trade-Dress Imitation and Consumer Choice , 2004 .

[28]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Raj S. Chhikara,et al.  The Inverse Gaussian Distribution , 1990 .

[30]  Jonathan Lee,et al.  Determinants of Trademark Dilution , 2006 .