Social structure contains epidemics and regulates individual roles in disease transmission in a group‐living mammal

Abstract Population structure is critical to infectious disease transmission. As a result, theoretical and empirical contact network models of infectious disease spread are increasingly providing valuable insights into wildlife epidemiology. Analyzing an exceptionally detailed dataset on contact structure within a high‐density population of European badgers Meles meles, we show that a modular contact network produced by spatially structured stable social groups, lead to smaller epidemics, particularly for infections with intermediate transmissibility. The key advance is that we identify considerable variation among individuals in their role in disease spread, with these new insights made possible by the detail in the badger dataset. Furthermore, the important impacts on epidemiology are found even though the modularity of the Badger network is much lower than the threshold that previous work suggested was necessary. These findings reveal the importance of stable social group structure for disease dynamics with important management implications for socially structured populations.

[1]  M. Craft,et al.  Model recommendations meet management reality: implementation and evaluation of a network-informed vaccination effort for endangered Hawaiian monk seals , 2018, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  D. Croft,et al.  Seasonal variation in daily patterns of social contacts in the European badger Meles meles , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  Shweta Bansal,et al.  Disease implications of animal social network structure: a synthesis across social systems , 2017, bioRxiv.

[4]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[5]  Gilbert Ritschard,et al.  Coefficient-wise tree-based varying coefficient regression with vcrpart , 2017 .

[6]  Shweta Bansal,et al.  Unraveling the disease consequences and mechanisms of modular structure in animal social networks , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Meggan E Craft,et al.  Using contact networks to explore mechanisms of parasite transmission in wildlife , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  K. VanderWaal,et al.  Heterogeneity in pathogen transmission: mechanisms and methodology , 2016 .

[9]  Jennifer J. H. Reynolds,et al.  Which mechanisms drive seasonal rabies outbreaks in raccoons? A test using dynamic social network models , 2016 .

[10]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  The consequences of unidentifiable individuals for the analysis of an animal social network , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  M. Craft Infectious disease transmission and contact networks in wildlife and livestock , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  C. Nunn,et al.  The sociality–health–fitness nexus: synthesis, conclusions and future directions , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Infectious disease and group size: more than just a numbers game , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Feng Xie,et al.  Epidemic spreading on complex networks with overlapping and non-overlapping community structure , 2015 .

[15]  R. Plowright,et al.  Costs and benefits of group living with disease: a case study of pneumonia in bighorn lambs (Ovis canadensis) , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Lauren Ancel Meyers,et al.  Network-based vaccination improves prospects for disease control in wild chimpanzees , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Not all types of host contacts are equal when it comes to E. coli transmission. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[18]  Brenda McCowan,et al.  Linking social and pathogen transmission networks using microbial genetics in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis). , 2014, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  Steven D. Prager,et al.  The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances , 2014 .

[20]  Stuart Bearhop,et al.  Badger social networks correlate with tuberculosis infection , 2013, Current Biology.

[21]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[22]  M. Chambers,et al.  Long-term temporal trends and estimated transmission rates for Mycobacterium bovis infection in an undisturbed high-density badger (Meles meles) population , 2013, Epidemiology and Infection.

[23]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Denning behaviour of the European badger (Meles meles) correlates with bovine tuberculosis infection status , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  Charles L. Nunn,et al.  Community structure and the spread of infectious disease in primate social networks , 2012, Evolutionary Ecology.

[25]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Repeatability for Gaussian and non‐Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists , 2010, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  Marcel Salathé,et al.  Dynamics and Control of Diseases in Networks with Community Structure , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[28]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Fission–fusion populations , 2009, Current Biology.

[29]  Joel C. Miller,et al.  Percolation and epidemics in random clustered networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  A. Zeileis,et al.  Regression Models for Count Data in R , 2008 .

[31]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Social Network Analysis with sna , 2008 .

[32]  S. P. Carter,et al.  Perturbing implications of wildlife ecology for disease control. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  Philip Riordan,et al.  Culling-induced social perturbation in Eurasian badgers Meles meles and the management of TB in cattle: an analysis of a critical problem in applied ecology , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[35]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Duelling timescales of host mixing and disease spread determine invasion of disease in structured populations , 2005 .

[36]  M. Newman Properties of highly clustered networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  M. Newman Spread of epidemic disease on networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[38]  L. M. Rogers,et al.  The use of marked bait in studies of the territorial organization of the European Badger (Meles meles) , 2000 .

[39]  A. Laddomada Incidence and control of CSF in wild boar in Europe. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[40]  R. Mcdonald Badgers and bovine tuberculosis , 1995, Current Biology.

[41]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The ecology of carnivore social behaviour , 1983, Nature.

[42]  M. Silk,et al.  Wildlife disease ecology from the individual to the population: Insights from a long‐term study of a naturally infected European badger population , 2018, The Journal of animal ecology.

[43]  Graham C. Smith,et al.  Management of disease in wild mammals , 2009 .

[44]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .