Seismic Performance of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Masonry: From Experimental Testing of the In-Plane Capacity of Walls to Building Response Simulation

The need to assess the seismic performance of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry arose in different countries in the last years. The use of AAC for load-bearing walls is quite common in low seismicity areas in Central and Northern Europe, where its thermal insulation properties, together with lightness and workability, are particularly appreciated. Increasing attention to energy-efficient buildings is now supporting the adoption of a material with such characteristics also in higher seismicity regions. Hence, in order to correctly study the seismic performance of this constructive system, the in-plane response of unreinforced AAC masonry panels has been assessed through an experimental test campaign aiming at obtaining a reliable description of the lateral cyclic behavior. The experimental results are summarized in the article and the derived essential seismic design parameters are presented. The test results allowed the calibration of a macro-element model representative of the nonlinear response of single piers, simulating their cyclic experimental behavior. Three-dimensional models of unreinforced AAC masonry buildings were then obtained using the TREMURI program. Their seismic performance assessment has been carried out through both a nonlinear static (pushover) procedure and nonlinear dynamic time history analyses. Nevertheless, the obtained results allow for some preliminary considerations on the global response of this type of construction and its potential for application in moderate and high seismicity countries.

[1]  Richard E. Klingner,et al.  Development of Seismic Force Reduction and Displacement Amplification Factors for Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Structures , 2006 .

[2]  Maria Rosa Valluzzi,et al.  Failure modes for in plane loaded masonry walls made with thin layer mortar , 2005 .

[3]  Miha Tomazevic,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings , 1999 .

[4]  Narayanan Sambu Potty,et al.  Non Linear Seismic Analysis of Masonry Structures , 2011 .

[5]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  ON THE USE OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING MASONRY BUILDINGS , 2006 .

[6]  P. Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance Based Seismic Design , 2001 .

[7]  Mete A. Sozen,et al.  SUBSTITUTE-STRUCTURE METHOD FOR SEISMIC DESIGN IN R/C , 1976 .

[8]  Polat Gülkan,et al.  INELASTIC RESPONSES OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES TO EARTHQUAKE MOTIONS , 1977 .

[9]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  In‐plane seismic response of brick masonry walls , 1997 .

[10]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra , 1999 .

[11]  M. Sozen,et al.  Inelastic Responses of Reinforced ConcreteStructure to Earthquake Motions , 1974 .

[12]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[13]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  DAMAGE MODELS FOR THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF BRICK MASONRY SHEAR WALLS. PART II: THE CONTINUUM MODEL AND ITS APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[14]  Richard E. Klingner,et al.  Seismic Testing of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Shearwalls: A Comprehensive Review , 2005 .