Impact of the similarity functions of surface layer parametrization in a climate model over the Indian region

Impact of the similarity functions of surface layer parametrization in National Centre for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (NCAR‐CAM5) is examined over the Indian region. The surface layer parametrization is based on the Monin–Obukhov similarity theory (MOST), which uses momentum and heat similarity functions to parametrize surface turbulent fluxes. In the present study, some of the well‐established similarity functions under stable as well as unstable stratification have been incorporated in the surface layer scheme of NCAR‐CAM5. Eight simulations have been conducted using different similarity functions with and without a limit on stability parameter along with the simulation using the default surface layer scheme. The impact of the incorporated functions on surface fluxes, near‐surface variables, and precipitation has been assessed in this climate model over different climatic zones for the boreal winter and summer seasons. The model represents the timing of diurnal variation of 2 m temperature and turbulent fluxes accurately with higher correlation in all simulations, but the performance of the schemes is found to be sensitive to the climatic zones and seasons. During the winter season, most of the schemes overestimate the night‐time surface air temperature over different climatic zones, but the simulation having a model performance index (MPI) of about 0.91 alleviates the bias. Under unstable stratification, the default scheme performs better than incorporated schemes in the winter season, whereas in boreal summer under unstable (stable) stratification, the incorporated functional form having an MPI of about 0.94 (0.97) does better than default and other schemes. As the performance of the functions is spatially and temporally dependent, based on the region and season of interest, the schemes may judiciously be chosen for the climate simulations.

[1]  C. Lüpkes,et al.  A Universal Approach for the Non‐Iterative Parametrization of Near‐Surface Turbulent Fluxes in Climate and Weather Prediction Models , 2021, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[2]  P. Srivastava,et al.  Uncertainty in the Parameterization of Surface Fluxes under Unstable Conditions , 2021 .

[3]  S. Mishra,et al.  Impact of Stochastic Entrainment in the NCAR CAM Deep Convection Parameterization on the Simulation of South Asian Summer Monsoon , 2021, Climate Dynamics.

[4]  C. Lüpkes,et al.  New Modified and Extended Stability Functions for the Stable Boundary Layer based on SHEBA and Parametrizations of Bulk Transfer Coefficients for Climate Models , 2020, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences.

[5]  P. Srivastava,et al.  On stability correction functions over the Indian region under stable conditions , 2020, Meteorological Applications.

[6]  S. Mishra,et al.  Response of Indian monsoon to increase of resolution in NCAR-CAM5 , 2019, Atmospheric Research.

[7]  P. Srivastava,et al.  Analysis of Dual Nature of Heat Flux Predicted by Monin‐Obukhov Similarity Theory: An Impact of Empirical Forms of Stability Correction Functions , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[8]  P. Mathur,et al.  Recent trends in rainfall and temperature over North West India during 1871–2016 , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[9]  Weimin Zheng,et al.  Automatic tuning of the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM5) by using short-term hindcasts with an improved downhill simplex optimization method , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[10]  S. Mishra,et al.  Performance of CMIP5 models in the simulation of Indian summer monsoon , 2018, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[11]  S. Mishra,et al.  Fidelity of CMIP5 multi-model mean in assessing Indian monsoon simulations , 2018, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science.

[12]  J. Fasullo,et al.  Importance of the Resolution of Surface Topography in Indian Monsoon Simulation , 2018, Journal of Climate.

[13]  J. S. Rawat,et al.  Indian Summer Monsoon Simulations: Usefulness of Increasing Horizontal Resolution, Manual Tuning, and Semi-Automatic Tuning in Reducing Present-Day Model Biases , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[14]  P. Srivastava,et al.  Characteristics of the Drag Coefficient over a Tropical Environment in Convective Conditions , 2015 .

[15]  G. Svensson,et al.  Evaluation of Near-Surface Variables and the Vertical Structure of the Boundary Layer in CMIP5 Models , 2015 .

[16]  W. Lu,et al.  Modifications on the surface layer scheme in RegCM4.3.5-CLM , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[17]  P. Srivastava,et al.  A Semi-Analytical Approach for Parametrization of the Obukhov Stability Parameter in the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer , 2014, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[18]  C. Hannay,et al.  Evaluation of Near-Surface Parameters in the Two Versions of the Atmospheric Model in CESM1 using Flux Station Observations , 2013 .

[19]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A Revised Scheme for the WRF Surface Layer Formulation , 2012 .

[20]  M. Sharan,et al.  Estimation of upper bounds for the applicability of non-linear similarity functions for non-dimensional wind and temperature profiles in the surface layer in very stable conditions , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  C. Bretherton,et al.  A New Moist Turbulence Parameterization in the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[22]  C. Bretherton,et al.  The University of Washington Shallow Convection and Moist Turbulence Schemes and Their Impact on Climate Simulations with the Community Atmosphere Model , 2009 .

[23]  R. Neale,et al.  The Impact of Convection on ENSO: From a Delayed Oscillator to a Series of Events , 2008 .

[24]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the Community Atmosphere Model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: Description and numerical tests , 2008 .

[25]  W. Collins,et al.  Radiative forcing by long‐lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models , 2008 .

[26]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Effects of Convective Momentum Transport on the Atmospheric Circulation in the Community Atmosphere Model, Version 3 , 2008 .

[27]  Edgar L. Andreas,et al.  SHEBA flux–profile relationships in the stable atmospheric boundary layer , 2007 .

[28]  T. Foken 50 Years of the Monin–Obukhov Similarity Theory , 2006 .

[29]  W. Brutsaert,et al.  Flux-profile Relationships for Wind Speed and Temperature in the Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2005 .

[30]  Shian‐Jiann Lin A “Vertically Lagrangian” Finite-Volume Dynamical Core for Global Models , 2004 .

[31]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Role of land surface processes in monsoon development: East Asia and West Africa , 2004 .

[32]  J. Janowiak,et al.  The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979-Present) , 2003 .

[33]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Bulk Parameterization of Air–Sea Fluxes: Updates and Verification for the COARE Algorithm , 2003 .

[34]  D. Wilson,et al.  An Alternative Function For The Wind And Temperature Gradients In Unstable Surface Layers , 2001 .

[35]  Christopher W. Fairall,et al.  Convective Profile Constants Revisited , 2000 .

[36]  Robert E. Dickinson,et al.  Intercomparison of Bulk Aerodynamic Algorithms for the Computation of Sea Surface Fluxes Using TOGA COARE and TAO Data , 1998 .

[37]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[38]  Shian‐Jiann Lin,et al.  Multidimensional Flux-Form Semi-Lagrangian Transport Schemes , 1996 .

[39]  E. F. Bradley,et al.  Bulk parameterization of air‐sea fluxes for Tropical Ocean‐Global Atmosphere Coupled‐Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment , 1996 .

[40]  N. McFarlane,et al.  Sensitivity of Climate Simulations to the Parameterization of Cumulus Convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model , 1995, Data, Models and Analysis.

[41]  Wilfried Brutsaert,et al.  Stability correction functions for the mean wind speed and temperature in the unstable surface layer , 1992 .

[42]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Flux Parameterization over Land Surfaces for Atmospheric Models , 1991 .

[43]  A. Holtslag,et al.  A High Resolution Air Mass Transformation Model for Short-Range Weather Forecasting , 1990 .

[44]  A. Yaglom,et al.  Mean fields and fluctuation moments in unstably stratified turbulent boundary layers , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[45]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[46]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Applied Modeling of the Nighttime Surface Energy Balance over Land , 1988 .

[47]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  Estimation of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Parameters for Diffusion Applications , 1985 .

[48]  J. Louis A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere , 1979 .

[49]  A. Dyer A review of flux-profile relationships , 1974 .

[50]  Hans A. Panofsky,et al.  Profiles of Wind and Temperature from Towers over Homogeneous Terrain. , 1973 .

[51]  A. Obukhov,et al.  Turbulence in an atmosphere with a non-uniform temperature , 1971 .

[52]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in Version 4 of the Community Land Model , 2011 .

[53]  J. Randerson,et al.  Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2010 .

[54]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[55]  Claude Girard,et al.  Stability functions correct at the free convection limit and consistent for for both the surface and Ekman layers , 1992 .

[56]  S. P. S. Arya,et al.  Introduction to micrometeorology , 1988 .

[57]  E. K. Webb Profile relationships: The log‐linear range, and extension to strong stability , 1970 .

[58]  P. A. Sheppard Atmospheric Turbulence , 1947, Nature.