Multiple semantic encoding of homophones and homographs in contexts biasing dominant or subordinate meanings

The resolution of lexical ambiguity was studied in two experiments. While subsequent selection would appear to limit longer term storage to one meaning of an ambiguous word, multiple initial encoding of homophones and homographs was indicated by the intrusion of their alternative meanings across trials in a Brown-Peterson paradigm. In Experiment 1 subjects heard four words and then engaged in a 10osec distractor task. Written recall was then demanded. On context trials a homophone with two distinct alternative meanings was presented with other words biasing either a dominant or subordinate meaning, for example, look, stare,peer, glance. On the next trial words related to an alternative meaning were presented, for example, dock, wharf, quay, jetty. Intrusions of the graphic forms of alternative meanings le.g.,PIER) into critical trial recall occurred whether the dominant or subordinate meaning of the homophone had been biased by context. Experiment 2 employed visual presentation of homographs, for example, GOLD, IRON,LEAD, and oral recall, but was logically similar to Experiment 1. Intrusions of the alternative codings of homographs across trials again occurred, for example, GUIDE, DIRECT,lead, regardless of the meaning originally biased by context.

[1]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences , 1973 .

[2]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Association, directionality, and stimulus encoding. , 1974 .

[3]  J. L. Myers Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[4]  Carol Conrad,et al.  Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[5]  D. J. Foss Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence comprehension , 1970 .

[6]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[7]  J. Morton 7 – A Functional Model for Memory1 , 1970 .

[8]  Delos D. Wickens,et al.  Encoding Categories of Words: An Empirical Approach to Meaning. , 1970 .

[9]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension , 1975 .

[10]  Gary G. Galbraith,et al.  Homophone units: A normative and methodological investigation of the strength of component elements , 1969 .

[11]  D. Swinney,et al.  Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension. , 1976 .

[12]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[13]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Definitional dominance distributions for 20 English homographs , 1977 .

[14]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Stimulus encoding and memory. , 1972 .

[16]  L. Light,et al.  Effects of Changed Semantic Context on Recognition Memory , 1970 .

[17]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Dual semantic encoding of homographs and homophones embedded in context , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[18]  D. L. Hintzman Tables of random letters , 1966 .