Getting Emotional about Health

The consequences of illness have two crucial types of stakes: for the self and for the family. Therefore, this research examines the effectiveness of health messages that present consequences for the self or for the family, focusing specifically on the dual role of emotions in serving these stakes as a provider of resources and information. The authors theorize that (1) the valence dimension of discrete emotions influences resources, thus fostering or hindering the processing of aversive health information, whereas (2) the self-/other-relatedness dimension of discrete emotions provides information that interacts with the focal referent in the message (self or family) to determine compatibility. In Experiments 1–3, the authors demonstrate that when people are primed with a positive emotion (e.g., happiness, peacefulness), the compatibility between the referent and the discrete emotion fosters the processing of health information. When the primed emotion is negative (e.g., sadness, agitation), however, compatibility hinders processing of the message. In Experiment 4, the authors track emotions before and after exposure to a health message to demonstrate that the observed effect occurs because of an increase in the negative emotional state in compatible situations when people process disease-related information. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of the findings for increasing the effectiveness of health-related messages.

[1]  E. Higgins,et al.  Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Selin A. Malkoc,et al.  Consumer Mood-regulation and Self-control: a Strategic View , 2005 .

[3]  Mary Frances Luce,et al.  Avoidance or Vigilance? The Psychology of False-Positive Test Results , 1999 .

[4]  G. Menon,et al.  When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk , 2004 .

[5]  J. Lerner,et al.  Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice , 2000 .

[6]  Y. Trope,et al.  Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Matching Versus Mismatching Attitude Functions: Implications for Scrutiny of Persuasive Messages , 1998 .

[8]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[12]  H. Margolis,et al.  Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and HCV-related chronic disease , 1998 .

[13]  Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. , 2002 .

[14]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Understanding High-Stakes Consumer Decisions: Mammography Adherence Following False-Alarm Test Results , 2003 .

[16]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Isaac M. Lipkus,et al.  Affect, Framing, and Persuasion , 2003 .

[18]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  When to Accentuate the Negative: The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior , 1995 .

[19]  N. Weinstein Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[20]  L. Perloff,et al.  Self–other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. , 1986 .

[21]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: the role of emotion specificity. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Emotional states and physical health. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[24]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  G. Menon,et al.  AIDS and Me, Never the Twain Shall Meet: The Effects of Information Accessibility on Judgments of Risk and Advertising Effectiveness , 1998 .

[26]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  We're at as Much Risk as We Are Led to Believe: Effects of Message Cues on Judgments of Health Risk , 2002 .

[27]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[29]  Jennifer Aaker,et al.  Empathy Versus Price: The Influence of Emotional Appeals Across Cultures , 1998 .

[30]  L. Aspinwall Rethinking the Role of Positive Affect in Self-Regulation , 1998 .

[31]  Y. Trope,et al.  Resolving Conflicts Among Self-Evaluative Motives: Positive Experiences as a Resource for Overcoming Defensiveness , 1998 .

[32]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .