How fMRI Can Inform Cognitive Theories

How can functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) advance cognitive theory? Some have argued that fMRI can do little beyond localizing brain regions that carry out certain cognitive functions (and may not even be able to do that). However, in this article, we argue that fMRI can inform theories of cognition by helping to answer at least four distinct kinds of questions. Which mental functions are performed in brain regions specialized for just that function (and which are performed in more general-purpose brain machinery)? When fMRI markers of a particular Mental Process X are found, is Mental Process X engaged when people perform Task Y? How distinct are the representations of different stimulus classes? Do specific pairs of tasks engage common or distinct processing mechanisms? Thus, fMRI data can be used to address theoretical debates that have nothing to do with where in the brain a particular process is carried out.

[1]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[2]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Sensitivity to musical structure in the human brain. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Memory Systems, Processing Modes, and Components , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[4]  A. Shimamura,et al.  Bridging Psychological and Biological Science: The Good, Bad, and Ugly , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[5]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Relationship Between fMRI and Theories of Cognition , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[6]  Max Coltheart,et al.  How Can Functional Neuroimaging Inform Cognitive Theories? , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[7]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Christopher L. Asplund,et al.  A Unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation of objects versus hands: neural mechanisms revealed by positron emission tomography. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[10]  D. Osherson,et al.  The boundaries of language and thought in deductive inference , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  N. Kanwisher Functional specificity in the human brain: A window into the functional architecture of the mind , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  James V. Haxby,et al.  Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI: The early beginnings , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Greenwald PSS 7210 . 1177 / 1745691611434210 GreenwaldMethod – Theory Synergy There Is Nothing So Theoretical as a Good Method , 2012 .

[14]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Schacter,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Primary Motor Cortex Affects Mental Rotation , 2022 .

[17]  G. Rees The new phrenology: the limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain , 2002 .

[18]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Age-related Changes in Object Processing and Contextual Binding Revealed Using fMR Adaptation , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Rugg,et al.  Moving Forward With fMRI Data , 2013, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[20]  K. Szpunar,et al.  Neural substrates of envisioning the future , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[22]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[23]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Colin Klein,et al.  Confirmation, Refutation, and the Evidence of fMRI , 2010 .

[25]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Age differences in brain activity during perceptual versus reflective attention , 2010, Neuroreport.

[26]  Yi Chen,et al.  Encoding the identity and location of objects in human LOC , 2011, NeuroImage.

[27]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Common Neural Mechanisms for Response Selection and Perceptual Processing , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[29]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Alana T. Wong,et al.  Age-Related Changes in the Episodic Simulation of Future Events , 2008, Psychological science.

[31]  R. Buckner,et al.  Self-projection and the brain , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  From cognitive to neural models of working memory , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Stephen José Hanson,et al.  Foundational issues in human brain mapping , 2010 .

[37]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  Thought Beyond Language , 2012, Psychological science.

[38]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images , 2004, Machine Learning.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Domain specificity in visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Jean Decety,et al.  What Are the Brain Mechanisms on Which Psychological Processes Are Based? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[41]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Real-World Scene Representations in High-Level Visual Cortex: It's the Spaces More Than the Places , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Soojin Park,et al.  Disentangling Scene Content from Spatial Boundary: Complementary Roles for the Parahippocampal Place Area and Lateral Occipital Complex in Representing Real-World Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Using functional neuroimaging to test theories of cognition: A selective survey of studies from 2007 to 2011 as a contribution to the Decade of the Mind Initiative , 2012, Cortex.

[44]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding Seen and Attended Motion Directions from Activity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[45]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Science Perspectives on Psychological Measuring Memory Reactivation with Functional Mri : Implications for Psychological Theory on Behalf Of: Association for Psychological Science , 2022 .

[46]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[48]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Top-down Enhancement and Suppression of the Magnitude and Speed of Neural Activity , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.