The role of pemetrexed as maintenance treatment in advanced NSCLC: a Phase III randomized trial

A randomized Phase III trial tested the efficacy of pemetrexed as maintenance treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were without progression after completing four cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival (PFS). Pemetrexed was significantly better than placebo both in terms of PFS and overall survival. The study was not designed as a direct comparison between ‘early’ and ‘delayed’ administration of pemetrexed because there was no mandatory cross-over in the control arm, in which less than 20% of patients actually received pemetrexed as second-line. However, a relevant proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC, due to early death or clinical deterioration, will never be able to receive a second-line treatment after disease progression. At the end of first-line treatment, the immediate administration of a drug that has not been received before (instead of adopting the ‘wait and watch’ approach based on stopping treatment until disease progression) could be a positive strategy, allowing patients to receive early one more potentially active drug without an unacceptable increase in toxicity. This strategy should be discussed with patients. Prespecified analysis of efficacy by tumor histology showed a significant interaction between treatment and histology, with pemetrexed producing significant and clinically meaningful benefit compared to placebo in the non-squamous group, without efficacy in patients with squamous tumors.

[1]  J. Liao,et al.  Maintenance therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer , 2010, The Lancet.

[2]  K. Krejcy,et al.  Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study , 2009, The Lancet.

[3]  M. Socinski Re-evaluating duration of therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: is it really duration or is it more about timing and exposure? , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  G. Scagliotti,et al.  The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two Phase III studies. , 2009, The oncologist.

[5]  Martin Marciniak,et al.  Phase III study of immediate compared with delayed docetaxel after front-line therapy with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Johan Vansteenkiste,et al.  Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Socinski,et al.  Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). , 2007, Chest.

[8]  C. Stevens,et al.  Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer-stage IIIA: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). , 2007, Chest.

[9]  Quynh-Thu Le,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology , 2006 .

[10]  Miklos Pless,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer guideline: update 2003. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  K. Markou,et al.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Head and Neck Cancers NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology . 2010. , 2011 .