Gluability of thermally modified beech (Fagus silvatica L.) and birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.) wood

Abstract One of the main disadvantages of wood is hygroscopicity resulting from its polar character. The sorption–desorption of water causes unwanted swelling and shrinkage in wood. Thermal modification substantially reduces this inconvenient feature. Unfortunately, the same chemical changes that reduce water sorption alter the polar character of the material and result in poorer wetting of thermally treated wood by waterborne adhesives. Gluability of thermally modified beech (Fagus silvatica L.) and birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.) wood with two commercial amino resins, melamine–urea–formaldehyde (MUF) and melamine–formaldehyde (MF), and a two-component polyurethane (PUR) adhesive was investigated. Both wood species were modified according to two temperature regimes: 160°C and 190°C. Shear strengths of the joints were then determined according to EN 205:2003 standard. The results showed that thermally modified beech and birch wood can be effectively glued not only with commercially available PUR adhesives, but also with aqueous MF and MUF resins. The resultant shear strengths of the joints were limited by the strength of the thermally modified substrate.

[1]  M. Alma,et al.  Investigating changes in the chemical consitutents and dimensional stability of heat-treated hornbeam and uludag fir wood , 2011, BioResources.

[2]  M. Šernek,et al.  Bonding of Heat-Treated Spruce with Phenol-Formaldehyde Adhesive , 2010 .

[3]  P. Niemz,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF CHEMICAL CHANGES IN THE STRUCTURE OF THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD , 2010 .

[4]  Antonio Pizzi,et al.  Bonding performance of heat treated wood with structural adhesives , 2008, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[5]  S. Shi,et al.  Dynamic adhesive wettability of wood , 2007 .

[6]  M. Petrič,et al.  Evolution of wood surface free energy after heat treatment , 2007 .

[7]  S. Shi,et al.  Effect of thermal treatment of wood lumbers on their adhesive bond strength and durability , 2007 .

[8]  M. Šernek,et al.  Bending and tension strength of finger-jointed boards made of thermally treated beech. , 2007 .

[9]  M. Šernek,et al.  Bonding of thermally modified spruce with PF and UF adhesives. , 2007 .

[10]  Engin Derya Gezer,et al.  Mechanical and chemical behavior of spruce wood modified by heat , 2006 .

[11]  C. Hill.  Thermal Modification of Wood , 2006 .

[12]  U. Müller,et al.  Effects of thermal modification on the adhesion between spruce wood (Picea abies Karst.) and a thermoplastic polymer , 2006, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[13]  R. Young,et al.  Wetting of wood , 1997, Wood Science and Technology.

[14]  S. Chow.  Infrared spectral characteristics and surface inactivation of wood at high temperatures , 1971, Wood Science and Technology.

[15]  B. Ek-Olausson,et al.  Investigation of some technical properties of heat-treated wood , 2003 .

[16]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Durability of heat-treated wood , 2002, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[17]  J. Kúdela,et al.  Analysis of the Wood-Wetting Process , 1994 .

[18]  M. Wolcott,et al.  Temperature dependence of wood surface energy. , 1994 .

[19]  M. Wolcott,et al.  Dynamic wettability of wood , 1991 .

[20]  C. Change,et al.  Properties of heat-darkened wood. II mechanical properties and gluability , 1978 .