Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms

An extraordinarily large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are now available in humans as well as in other model organisms. Technological advancements may soon make it feasible to assay hundreds of SNPs in virtually any organism of interest. One potential application of SNPs is the determination of pairwise genetic relationships in populations without known pedigrees. Although microsatellites are currently the marker of choice for this purpose, the number of independently segregating microsatellite markers that can be feasibly assayed is limited. Thus, it can be difficult to distinguish reliably some classes of relationship (e.g. full‐sibs from half‐sibs) with microsatellite data alone. We assess, via Monte Carlo computer simulation, the potential for using a large panel of independently segregating SNPs to infer genetic relationships, following the analytical approach of Blouin et al. (1996 ). We have explored a ‘best case scenario’ in which 100 independently segregating SNPs are available. For discrimination among single‐generation relationships or for the identification of parent–offspring pairs, it appears that such a panel of moderately polymorphic SNPs (minor allele frequency of 0.20) will provide discrimination power equivalent to only 16–20 independently segregating microsatellites. Although newly available analytical methods that can account for tight genetic linkage between markers will, in theory, allow improved estimation of relationships using thousands of SNPs in highly dense genomic scans, in practice such studies will only be feasible in a handful of model organisms. Given the comparable amount of effort required for the development of both types of markers, it seems that microsatellites will remain the marker of choice for relationship estimation in nonmodel organisms, at least for the foreseeable future.

[1]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Determination of ancestral alleles for human single-nucleotide polymorphisms using high-density oligonucleotide arrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[2]  B. Smith,et al.  Accurate partition of individuals into full-sib families from genetic data without parental information. , 2001, Genetics.

[3]  J. Avise,et al.  Genetic parentage in large half-sib clutches: theoretical estimates and empirical appraisals. , 2000, Genetics.

[4]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E. A. Thompson,et al.  Genetic linkage in the estimation of pairwise relationship , 1998, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  Timothy P. L. Smith,et al.  Selection and use of SNP markers for animal identification and paternity analysis in U.S. beef cattle , 2002, Mammalian Genome.

[7]  L Sun,et al.  Statistical tests for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  H H Göring,et al.  Relationship Estimation in Affected Sib Pair Analysis of Late-Onset Diseases , 1997, European journal of human genetics : EJHG.

[9]  Pui-Yan Kwok,et al.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the public domain: how useful are they? , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[10]  C. Primmer,et al.  Single‐nucleotide polymorphism characterization in species with limited available sequence information: high nucleotide diversity revealed in the avian genome , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[11]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. , 1999, Genetics.

[12]  T. Glenn,et al.  Refining the Whooping Crane Studbook by Incorporating Microsatellite DNA and Leg‐Banding Analyses , 2002 .

[13]  P. Bentzen,et al.  The aunt and uncle effect: an empirical evaluation of the confounding influence of full sibs of parents on pedigree reconstruction. , 2001, The Journal of heredity.

[14]  K. P. Donnelly,et al.  The probability that related individuals share some section of genome identical by descent. , 1983, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  Kermit Ritland,et al.  Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients , 1996 .

[16]  J. Avise,et al.  EVALUATING KINSHIP OF NEWLY SETTLED JUVENILES WITHIN SOCIAL GROUPS OF THE CORAL REEF FISH ANTHIAS SQUAMIPINNIS , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  A. Jones,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex‐role reversal , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[18]  Jinliang Wang,et al.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers. , 2002, Genetics.

[19]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[21]  Pardis C Sabeti,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium in the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[22]  M. Daly,et al.  A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Boundary-Crossing Probability,et al.  MARKOV PROCESSES FOR MODELING AND ANALYZING A NEW GENETIC MAPPING METHOD , 1993 .

[24]  P. Pamilo,et al.  Measuring genetic relatedness in natural populations: Methodology , 1982 .

[25]  M. Boehnke,et al.  Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  A Jamieson,et al.  Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. , 1997, Animal genetics.

[27]  D. Queller,et al.  Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[28]  Dmitri V. Zaykin,et al.  Effectiveness of computational methods in haplotype prediction , 2002, Human Genetics.

[29]  K. Kidd,et al.  Genealogy reconstruction from short tandem repeat genotypes in an Amazonian population. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[30]  M P Epstein,et al.  Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  E Matthysen,et al.  A comparison of microsatellite‐based pairwise relatedness estimators , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[32]  M. Blouin,et al.  Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness , 1996, Molecular ecology.

[33]  R. Crozier,et al.  POPULATION AND COLONY GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE PRIMITIVE TERMITE MASTOTERMES DARWINIENSIS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  D E Weeks,et al.  Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. , 1993, Human heredity.

[35]  C. Nusbaum,et al.  Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. , 1998, Science.

[36]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Reproductive skew among males in a female-dominated mammalian society , 2002 .

[37]  D. Heg,et al.  Female–female cooperation in polygynous oystercatchers , 1998, Nature.

[38]  J. Avise,et al.  Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals , 2000 .

[39]  E A Thompson,et al.  The estimation of pairwise relationships , 1975, Annals of human genetics.

[40]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[41]  J. J. Moore,et al.  Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. , 1994, Science.

[42]  P. Kwok,et al.  Methods for genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms. , 2003, Annual review of genomics and human genetics.

[43]  K. Ritland Marker‐inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[44]  Christopher N. Johnson,et al.  Relatedness structure detected by microsatellite analysis and attempted pedigree reconstruction in an endangered marsupial, the northern hairy‐nosed wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[45]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data. , 2000, Genetics.