Quantitative OCT angiography features for objective classification and staging of diabetic retinopathy

Purpose: This study aims to characterize quantitative optical-coherence-tomography-angiography (OCTA) features of non-proliferative diabetic-retinopathy (NPDR), and to validate them for computer-aided NPDR staging. Methods: 120 OCTA images from 60 NPDR (mild, moderate and severe stages) patients and 40 images from 20 control subjects were used for this study conducted in a tertiary, subspecialty, academic practice. Both eyes were photographed and all of the OCTAs were 6 mm × 6 mm macular scans. Six quantitative features, i.e., blood vessel tortuosity (BVT), blood vascular caliber (BVC), vessel perimeter index (VPI), blood vessel density (BVD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area (FAZ-A), and FAZ contour irregularity (FAZ-CI) were derived from each OCTA image. A support vector machine (SVM) classification model was trained and tested for computer-aided classification of NPDR stages. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were used as performance-metrics of computer-aided classification and receiver-operation-characteristics (ROC) curve was plotted to measure the sensitivity-specificity tradeoff of the classification algorithm. Results: Among six individual OCTA features, BVD shows the best classification accuracies, 93.89% and 90.89% for control vs. disease and control vs. mild-NPDR, respectively. Combined-feature classification achieved improved accuracies, 94.41% and 92.96% respectively. Moreover, the temporal-perifoveal region was the most-sensitive region for early detection of DR. For multiclass classification, SVM algorithm achieved 84% accuracy. Conclusion: BVD was observed as the most-sensitive feature and temporal-perifoveal region was the most-sensitive region for early detection of DR. Quantitative OCTA analysis enabled computer-aided identification and staging of NPDR. Summary Statement: Quantitative OCTA features are used for computer-aided classification and objective staging of diabetic retinopathy. Blood-vessel density is the most sensitive OCTA feature, and temporal-perifoveal retina is the most sensitive region for detecting early onset of NPDR.

[1]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[2]  Hyewon Chung,et al.  QUANTIFICATION OF RETINAL VESSEL TORTUOSITY IN DIABETIC RETINOPATHY USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY , 2017, Retina.

[3]  Xincheng Yao,et al.  Computer-aided classification of sickle cell retinopathy using quantitative features in optical coherence tomography angiography. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[4]  Xincheng Yao,et al.  Quantitative characteristics of sickle cell retinopathy in optical coherence tomography angiography. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[5]  Augustinus Laude,et al.  Automated microaneurysm detection in diabetic retinopathy using curvelet transform , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  Handan Akil,et al.  Ocular manifestations of Type 1 diabetes mellitus in pediatric population , 2016, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  Rosa Dolz-Marco,et al.  Fractal Dimensional Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Eyes With Diabetic Retinopathy. , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Carmen A. Puliafito,et al.  Quantifying Microvascular Density and Morphology in Diabetic Retinopathy Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  E. Souied,et al.  Macular Microangiopathy in Sickle Cell Disease Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  T. Wong,et al.  Retinal Imaging Techniques for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[11]  Ştefan Ţălu,et al.  Characterisation of human non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy using the fractal analysis. , 2015, International journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  L. Egede,et al.  Trends in Health Care Expenditure in U.S. Adults With Diabetes: 2002–2011 , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[13]  Akitoshi Yoshida,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Prospective Pilot Study. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Mostafa Hosseini,et al.  Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity , 2015, Emergency.

[15]  Gianni Virgili,et al.  Optical coherence tomography (OCT) for detection of macular oedema in patients with diabetic retinopathy. , 2015, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  A. Motala,et al.  Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults. , 2014, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[17]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: A review , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[18]  K. Hajian‐Tilaki,et al.  Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Medical Diagnostic Test Evaluation. , 2013, Caspian journal of internal medicine.

[19]  Jennifer I. Lim Ophthalmic manifestations of sickle cell disease: update of the latest findings , 2012, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[20]  Jennifer I. Lim,et al.  Central macular splaying and outer retinal thinning in asymptomatic sickle cell patients by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Sergio Escalera,et al.  On the Decoding Process in Ternary Error-Correcting Output Codes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Philip J. Morrow,et al.  Algorithms for digital image processing in diabetic retinopathy , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[23]  J. Reitsma,et al.  Diagnostic methods I: sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of accuracy. , 2009, Kidney international.

[24]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated Identification of Diabetic Retinopathy Stages Using Digital Fundus Images , 2008, Journal of Medical Systems.

[25]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[26]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Reducing Multiclass to Binary: A Unifying Approach for Margin Classifiers , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[27]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[28]  L. Breiman,et al.  Submodel selection and evaluation in regression. The X-random case , 1992 .

[29]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[30]  T. Saclarides Diabetes mellitus: classification, etiology, diagnosis, complications, and possible ocular manifestations. , 1982, Journal of ophthalmic nursing & technology.

[31]  M. Goldbaum,et al.  Macular and perimacular vascular remodelling sickling haemoglobinopathies. , 1976, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  G. Serjeant,et al.  Ocular findings in homozygous sickle cell anemia in Jamaica. , 1972, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  J. Gass A fluorescein angiographic study of macular dysfunction secondary to retinal vascular disease. VI. X-ray irradiation, carotid artery occlusion, collagen vascular disease, and vitritis. , 1968, Archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  G. Renard [OCULAR MANIFESTATIONS OF DIABETES MELLITUS]. , 1964, Le Diabete.

[35]  G. M. Milkie Ocular manifestations associated with diabetes mellitus; a case report. , 1956, American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry.