论文信息 - Is peer review in crisis ?

Is peer review in crisis ?

Peer review is an essential component of scholarly publishing. In recent years it has attracted criticism and its role has been challenged. Based upon the findings of focus groups commissioned by Elsevier, this paper examines the role of peer review and discusses if, and how, it could be improved. Perspectives in Publishing is an occasional newsletter for journal editors. It aims to address generic issues in scholarly communication.

Richard Horton | R. Horton

[1] D. Rennie,et al. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators. , 1998, JAMA.

[2] A. Weller. Editorial peer review , 2001 .

[3] J. Ziman,et al. Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science , 1970, Medical History.

[4] C. Olson,et al. Peer review of the biomedical literature. , 1990, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[5] R. Hauptman. Dishonesty in the Academy. , 2002 .

[6] R Smith,et al. Opening up BMJ peer review , 1999, BMJ.

[7] J. Lavelle. Facts of Journal Publishing, IV , 1966 .

[8] F. Godlee,et al. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial , 1999, BMJ.

[9] R. Merton,et al. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .

[10] Michael Mabe,et al. Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing , 2002, Aslib Proc..