FACTS Devices Impact on Congestion Mitigation of Power System

The voltage magnitude and reactive power control of a large power system are computed on the basis of its dynamic voltage controllers, which may overcome the limitations of a conventional controller of the power system. The approach of the voltage controller is dynamic in nature and capable of controlling voltage of the bus to the specified level and eliminates such circumstances which may lead the system to become uncontrollable. The static series compensation devices are capable of providing additional flexibility in the operation of power transfer on transmission lines. The previously presented paper discussed multiple applications of FACTS devices either in series or shunt connected. The FACTS devices, i.e., TCSC and SSSC, are incorporated in IEEE-14 bus test system for the analysis of their performance in a relation of reactive power and voltage magnitude. The steady-state modelling of these devices has been carried out by deriving the static equations. The WLS technique is used for measuring system parameters on individual buses. The techniques help in reducing error and improving accuracy in measuring of system parameters. The weak buses on which the voltage profile is poor have been identified. The FACTS devices as mentioned above are located on these buses. The voltage profile on these buses improves remarkably. The reactive power variation on these buses has been computed and graphically plotted. The size of the FACTS devices and their allocation has been determined on the basis of voltage magnitude and reactive power required on those buses during loading conditions. The IEEE 14 bus test system is designed on MATLAB/SIMULINK environment.

[1]  Jovitha Jerome,et al.  A new Cumulative Gravitational Search algorithm for optimal placement of FACT device to minimize system loss in the deregulated electrical power environment , 2017 .

[2]  J.H. Chow,et al.  Transfer Path Stability Enhancement by Voltage-Sourced Converter-Based FACTS Controllers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[3]  Sunil Kumar Singh,et al.  Voltage Profile and Power Flow Enhancement with FACTS Controllers , 2012 .

[4]  Narayana Prasad Padhy,et al.  Power flow control and solutions with multiple and multi-type FACTS devices , 2005 .

[5]  Gilsoo Jang,et al.  Modeling and Control of VSI type FACTS controllers for Power System Dynamic Stability using the current injection method , 2008 .

[6]  Engin Karatepe,et al.  Optimum allocation of FACTS devices under load uncertainty based on penalty functions with genetic algorithm , 2016, Electrical Engineering.

[7]  Shahab Mehraeen,et al.  Modeling and Nonlinear Optimal Control of Weak/Islanded Grids Using FACTS Device in a Game Theoretic Approach , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems , 1999 .

[9]  K. R. Niazi,et al.  Optimal location of FACTS devices for improving performance of the power systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[10]  Anwar Shahzad Siddiqui,et al.  Application of multiple FACTS devices of similar type for congestion mitigation , 2016, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..

[11]  Seth Blumsack,et al.  Transfer Capability Improvement Through Market-Based Operation of Series FACTS Devices , 2016 .

[12]  M Ramadan Sayed,et al.  Power System Quality Improvement Using Flexible AC Transmission Systems Based on Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System , 2013 .

[13]  Innocent Kamwa,et al.  Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Rafael Mihalic,et al.  Modelling the SSSC Device in the Power Flow Problem as Power Injections Regulated According to First Order Sensitivity , 2015 .

[15]  Ben Mehraban,et al.  Extending Their Lifetimes : Keeping HVdc and FACTS Installations in Service Longer , 2016, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[16]  Shivangi Agarwal,et al.  Enhancement of Transient Stability of Multimachine System Using TCSC, SSSC and UPFC , 2018 .

[17]  B. V. Manikandan,et al.  Available Transfer Capability Enhancement with FACTS Devices in the Deregulated Electricity Market , 2011 .

[18]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  Optimal Location of TCSC Using Evolutionary Optimization Techniques , 2016 .

[19]  Y. H. Song,et al.  Available transfer capability enhancement using FACTS devices , 2003 .

[20]  Anwar Shahzad Siddiqui,et al.  Determination of optimal location of TCSC and STATCOM for congestion management in deregulated power system , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag..