Taking a Long Look: A Two-decade Reverberation Mapping Study of High-luminosity Quasars

Reverberation mapping (RM) of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) has been used over the past three decades to determine AGN broad-line region (BLR) sizes and central black hole masses, and their relations with the AGN luminosity. Until recently, the sample of objects with RM data was limited to low-luminosity AGNs (L opt ≲ 1046 erg s−1) and low redshifts (z ≲ 0.5). Here we present results from an RM project of some of the most luminous and highest-redshift quasars that have been mapped to date. The study is based on almost 20 years of photometric monitoring of 11 quasars, 6 of which were monitored spectrophotometrically for 13 yr. This is the longest RM project carried out so far on this type of AGNs. We successfully measure a time lag between the C iv λ 1549 broad emission line and the quasar continuum in three objects, and measure a C iii] λ 1909 lag in one quasar. Together with recently published data on C iv RM, the BLR size is found to scale as the square root of the UV luminosity over eight orders of magnitude in AGN luminosity. There is a significant scatter in the relation, part of which may be intrinsic to the AGNs. Although the C iv line is probably less well suited than Balmer lines for determination of the mass of the black hole, virial masses are tentatively computed, and in spite of a large scatter, we find that the mass of the black hole scales as the square root of the UV luminosity.

[1]  G. Cresci,et al.  SUPER III. Broad line region properties of AGNs at z~2 , 2020 .

[2]  L. Ho,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Estimating Masses of Black Holes in Quasars with Single-epoch Spectroscopy , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  H. Netzer Testing broad-line region models with reverberation mapping , 2020, 2003.07660.

[4]  L. Ho,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Comparison of Lag Measurement Methods with Simulated Observations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[5]  W. Brandt,et al.  On reverberation mapping lag uncertainties , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[6]  L. Ho,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Improving Lag Detection with an Extended Multiyear Baseline , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  G. D. Rosa,et al.  Anomalous behaviour of the UV–optical continuum bands in NGC 5548 , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[8]  L. Ho,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Initial C iv Lag Results from Four Years of Data , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[9]  N. E. Sommer,et al.  C iv black hole mass measurements with the Australian Dark Energy Survey (OzDES) , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[10]  W. Brandt,et al.  The First Swift Intensive AGN Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping Survey , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[11]  S. Kaspi,et al.  Direct evidence of non-disk optical continuum emission around an active black hole , 2018, Nature Astronomy.

[12]  L. Ho,et al.  Monitoring AGNs with Hβ Asymmetry. I. First Results: Velocity-resolved Reverberation Mapping , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[13]  N. Morrell,et al.  Reverberation Mapping of Luminous Quasars at High z , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  P. Lira,et al.  Can we improve C iv-based single-epoch black hole mass estimations? , 2018, 1805.00942.

[15]  Ran Wang,et al.  The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Hα and Hβ Reverberation Measurements from First-year Spectroscopy and Photometry , 2017, 1711.03114.

[16]  G. Richards,et al.  Correcting C iv-Based Virial Black Hole Masses , 2016, 1610.08977.

[17]  Chen Hu,et al.  SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES WITH HIGH ACCRETION RATES IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. V. A NEW SIZE–LUMINOSITY SCALING RELATION FOR THE BROAD-LINE REGION , 2016, 1604.06218.

[18]  P. Lira,et al.  Active galactic nuclei at z ̃ 1.5 - II. Black hole mass estimation by means of broad emission lines , 2016, 1603.03437.

[19]  Bradley M. Peterson,et al.  THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY REVERBERATION MAPPING PROJECT: FIRST BROAD-LINE Hβ AND Mg ii LAGS AT z ≳ 0.3 FROM SIX-MONTH SPECTROSCOPY , 2015, 1510.02802.

[20]  F. G. Saturni,et al.  A multi-epoch spectroscopic study of the BAL quasar APM 08279+5255 II. Emission- and absorption-line variability time lags , 2015, 1512.03195.

[21]  Chen Hu,et al.  SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES WITH HIGH ACCRETION RATES IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. IV. Hβ TIME LAGS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SUPER-EDDINGTON ACCRETION , 2015, 1504.01844.

[22]  P. Hall,et al.  SPACE TELESCOPE AND OPTICAL REVERBERATION MAPPING PROJECT. I. ULTRAVIOLET OBSERVATIONS OF THE SEYFERT 1 GALAXY NGC 5548 WITH THE COSMIC ORIGINS SPECTROGRAPH ON HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE , 2015, 1501.05954.

[23]  F. G. Saturni,et al.  C iv AND C iii] REVERBERATION MAPPING OF THE LUMINOUS QUASAR PG 1247+267 , 2014, 1409.5448.

[24]  K. Denney,et al.  CALIBRATING C-iv-BASED BLACK HOLE MASS ESTIMATORS , 2013, 1304.7281.

[25]  Luis Carrasco,et al.  FLARE-LIKE VARIABILITY OF THE Mg ii λ2800 EMISSION LINE IN THE γ-RAY BLAZAR 3C 454.3 , 2013, 1301.3064.

[26]  M. Gurwell,et al.  The Gamma-ray Activity of the high-z Quasar 0836+71 , 2013 .

[27]  B. Trakhtenbrot,et al.  Black Hole Growth to z = 2 - I: Improved Virial Methods for Measuring M_BH and L/L_Edd , 2012, 1209.1096.

[28]  C. Kochanek,et al.  IS QUASAR OPTICAL VARIABILITY A DAMPED RANDOM WALK? , 2012, 1202.3783.

[29]  Anthony C. S. Readhead,et al.  SPECTROSCOPY OF BROAD-LINE BLAZARS FROM 1LAC , 2012, 1201.0999.

[30]  G. Richards,et al.  UNIFICATION OF LUMINOUS TYPE 1 QUASARS THROUGH C iv EMISSION , 2010, 1011.2282.

[31]  C. S. Kochanek,et al.  AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURING REVERBERATION LAGS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI , 2010, 1008.0641.

[32]  Douglas P. Finkbeiner,et al.  MEASURING REDDENING WITH SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STELLAR SPECTRA AND RECALIBRATING SFD , 2010, 1012.4804.

[33]  Yolanda Stapleton Love Love Love , 2008 .

[34]  O. Shemmer,et al.  THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL,???:???–???, 200????????? Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 12/14/05 BLACK-HOLE MASS AND GROWTH RATE AT HIGH REDSHIFT , 2007 .

[35]  D. Trèvese,et al.  Line and continuum variability of two intermediate-redshift, high-luminosity quasars , 2007, 0704.1958.

[36]  B. Wills,et al.  Spectral Properties from Lyα to Hα for an Essentially Complete Sample of Quasars. I. Data , 2007, astro-ph/0703690.

[37]  Shai Kaspi,et al.  Reverberation Mapping of High-Luminosity Quasars: First Results , 2006, astro-ph/0612722.

[38]  B. Peterson,et al.  The Mass of the Central Black Hole in the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 4151 , 2006, astro-ph/0605038.

[39]  L. Ho,et al.  Multiwavelength Monitoring of the Dwarf Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 4395. I. A Reverberation-based Measurement of the Black Hole Mass , 2005, astro-ph/0506665.

[40]  D. Maoz,et al.  The Relationship between Luminosity and Broad-Line Region Size in Active Galactic Nuclei , 2005, astro-ph/0504484.

[41]  A. Laor,et al.  What controls the C iv line profile in active galactic nuclei , 2004, astro-ph/0409196.

[42]  B. M. Peterson,et al.  Central Masses and Broad-Line Region Sizes of Active Galactic Nuclei. II. A Homogeneous Analysis of a Large Reverberation-Mapping Database , 2004, astro-ph/0407299.

[43]  S. Paltani,et al.  Dynamics of the Lyα and C IV Emitting Gas in 3C 273 , 2002, astro-ph/0210126.

[44]  J. Shields,et al.  Continuum and Emission-Line Strength Relations for a Large Active Galactic Nuclei Sample , 2002, astro-ph/0208348.

[45]  B. Peterson,et al.  Determining Central Black Hole Masses in Distant Active Galaxies and Quasars. II. Improved Optical and UV Scaling Relationships , 2002, astro-ph/0601303.

[46]  S. Tremaine,et al.  The Slope of the Black Hole Mass versus Velocity Dispersion Correlation , 2002, astro-ph/0203468.

[47]  J. Shields,et al.  Emission-Line Properties of z > 4 Quasars , 2001, astro-ph/0109328.

[48]  A. Markowitz,et al.  X-Ray Spectral Variability and Rapid Variability of the Soft X-Ray Spectrum Seyfert 1 Galaxies Arakelian 564 and Ton S180 , 2001, astro-ph/0108387.

[49]  Paul S. Smith,et al.  Reverberation Measurements for 17 Quasars and the Size-Mass-Luminosity Relations in Active Galactic Nuclei , 1999, astro-ph/9911476.

[50]  Niall Gaffney,et al.  Early performance and present status of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[51]  Phillip J. MacQueen,et al.  Hobby-Eberly Telescope low-resolution spectrograph , 1998, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[52]  Bradley M. Peterson,et al.  Steps toward Determination of the Size and Structure of the Broad-Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei. XIV. Intensive Optical Spectrophotometric Observations of NGC 7469 , 1998 .

[53]  Bradley M. Peterson,et al.  On Uncertainties in Cross‐Correlation Lags and the Reality of Wavelength‐dependent Continuum Lags in Active Galactic Nuclei , 1998, astro-ph/9802103.

[54]  Claudia Winge,et al.  Steps toward Determination of the Size and Structure of the Broad-Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei. IX. Ultraviolet Observations of Fairall 9 , 1997 .

[55]  Matthew A. Bershady,et al.  Linear Regression for Astronomical Data with Measurement Errors and Intrinsic Scatter , 1996, astro-ph/9605002.

[56]  Bradley M. Peterson,et al.  COMMENTS ON CROSS-CORRELATION METHODOLOGY IN VARIABILITY STUDIES OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI , 1994 .

[57]  Bradley M. Peterson,et al.  REVERBERATION MAPPING OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI , 1993 .

[58]  R Edelson,et al.  The Discrete Correlation Function: a New Method for Analyzing Unevenly Sampled Variability Data , 1988 .

[59]  B. Peterson,et al.  The Accuracy of Cross-Correlation Estimates of Quasar Emission-Line Region Sizes , 1987 .

[60]  C. M. Gaskell,et al.  Line variations in quasars and Seyfert galaxies , 1986 .

[61]  J. Baldwin Luminosity Indicators in the Spectra of Quasi-Stellar Objects , 1977 .