The response of the amblyopic visual system to noise

Visual perception is limited by both the strength of the neural signals, and by the noise in the visual nervous system. Here we use one-dimensional white noise as input, to study the response of amblyopic visual system. We measured the thresholds for detection and discrimination of noise contrast. Using an N-pass reverse correlation technique, we derived classification images and estimated response consistency. Our results provide the first report of the sensitivity of the amblyopic visual system to white noise. We show that amblyopes have markedly reduced sensitivity for detecting noise, particularly at high spatial frequencies, and much less loss for discriminating suprathreshold noise contrast. Compensating for the detection loss almost (but not quite) equates performance of the amblyopic and normal visual system. The classification images suggest that the amblyopic visual system contains adjustable channels for noise, similar to those found in normal vision, but "tuned" to slightly lower spatial frequencies than in normal observers. Our N-pass results show that the predominant factor limiting performance in our task in both normal and amblyopic vision is internal random multiplicative noise. For the detection of white noise the raised thresholds of the amblyopic visual system can be attributed primarily to extra additive noise. However, for the discrimination of suprathreshold white noise contrast, there is surprisingly little additional deficit, after accounting for the visibility of the noise.

[1]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification images: a tool to analyze visual strategies. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[2]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .

[3]  Allison B. Sekuler,et al.  Noise detection: Optimal summation of orientation information , 2004 .

[4]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  William McIlhagga,et al.  Noisy templates explain area summation , 1999, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial uncertainty and sampling efficiency in amblyopic position acuity , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Noise Provides Some New Signals About the Spatial Vision of Amblyopes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  L. Kiorpes.  Visual Processing in Amblyopia: Animal Studies , 2006, Strabismus.

[12]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  Denis G Pelli,et al.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[15]  D. Levi,et al.  Is second-order spatial loss in amblyopia explained by the loss of first-order spatial input? , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  G E Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Visual Processing in Amblyopia: Human Studies , 2006, Strabismus.

[18]  G. Legge.  A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[19]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Stimulus information contaminates summation tests of independent neural representations of features. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[20]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[21]  R. Freeman,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: masking effects of noise. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Paul V. McGraw,et al.  Spatial interactions reveal inhibitory cortical networks in human amblyopia , 2005, Vision Research.

[23]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision , 1994, Vision Research.

[24]  S. Klein,et al.  Separating transducer non-linearities and multiplicative noise in contrast discrimination , 2006, Vision Research.

[25]  S. K. Fisher,et al.  IMPAIRMENT OF CONTRAST DISCRIMINATION IN AMBLYOPIC EYES , 1987, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Contrast detection and detection of contrast modulation for noise gratings , 1985, Vision Research.

[27]  P. Bennett,et al.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours , 2000, Current Biology.

[28]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination , 1986, Vision Research.

[30]  R. Hess,et al.  Detection, discrimination and integration of second-order orientation information in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia , 2005, Vision Research.

[31]  S. Klein,et al.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. , 1974, Vision research.

[32]  D. Levi,et al.  Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint , 2006, Vision Research.

[33]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[34]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  What is the signal in noise , 2004 .

[35]  D. Kersten.  Statistical efficiency for the detection of visual noise , 1987, Vision Research.

[36]  Lynne Kiorpes,et al.  Factors limiting contrast sensitivity in experimentally amblyopic macaque monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[37]  N. Graham.  Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[38]  A. Ahumada,et al.  Stimulus Features in Signal Detection , 1971 .

[39]  Pengjing Xu,et al.  Identify mechanisms of amblyopia in Gabor orientation identification with external noise , 2006, Vision Research.

[40]  B. Dosher,et al.  Mechanisms of perceptual learning , 1999, Vision Research.

[41]  D. M. Green,et al.  Auditory Detection of a Noise Signal , 1960 .

[42]  Bettina L. Beard,et al.  Spatial scale shifts in amblyopia , 1994, Vision Research.

[43]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Classification images for detection and position discrimination in the fovea and parafovea. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[45]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[46]  A. B. Sekuler,et al.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning , 1999, Nature.

[47]  Denis G. Pelli.  Vision: coding and efficiency , 1990 .

[48]  R. Hess,et al.  Contrast-coding in amblyopia. I. Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopia , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[49]  D. M. Green,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF AUDITORY DETECTION JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Psychological review.