A public goods model of outcomes from online knowledge sharing mediated by mental model processing

This study aims to take a public goods approach to understand relationships between collecting and contributing knowledge to an online knowledge sharing portal (KSP), mental model processing and outcomes at the individual and collective levels.,This study reports on a survey (N = 602) among tax professionals, examining the perceived individual and collective benefits and costs associated with collecting and contributing knowledge. Hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling.,Collecting and contributing knowledge led to considerable mental model processing of the knowledge. That in turn significantly influenced (primarily) individual and (some) collective costs and benefits. Results varied by the kinds of knowledge sharing. Whether directly from knowledge sharing, or mediated through mental modeling, the perceived costs and benefits may be internalized as an individual good rather than being interpreted at the collective level as a public good.,The study is situated in the early stages of a wiki-type online KSP. A focus on the learning potential of the system could serve to draw in new users and contributors, heightening perceptions of the public goods dimension of a KSP.,A focus on the learning potential of the system could serve to draw in new users, and thus the number of subsequent contributors, heightening perceptions of the collective, public goods dimension of a KSP.,This study explores how knowledge sharing and mental model processing are directly and indirectly associated with individual and collective costs and benefits. As online knowledge sharing is both an individual and public good, costs and benefits must be considered from both perspectives.

[1]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems , 1996 .

[2]  Ratna Babu Chinnam,et al.  Knowledge reuse through electronic knowledge repositories: a multi theoretical study , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[3]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[4]  Edward L. Fink,et al.  Interattitude Structure and Attitude Dynamics A Comparison of the Hierarchical and Galileo Spatial-Linkage Models , 2005 .

[5]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[6]  Maimunah Ismail,et al.  Knowledge sharing is knowledge transfer: a misconception in the literature , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  P. Resnick,et al.  Building Successful Online Communities: Evidence-Based Social Design , 2012 .

[8]  Chris Higgins,et al.  Information Acquisition and Mental Models: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Behaviour and Learning , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Ralph A. Heidl,et al.  Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks , 2011 .

[10]  Jang Bahadur Singh,et al.  Factors affecting Web 2.0 adoption: exploring the knowledge sharing and knowledge seeking aspects in health care professionals , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[12]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Accessing and Browsing Information and Communication , 2001 .

[13]  L. Prusak,et al.  Chapter 10 – Knowledge Buyers, Sellers, and Brokers: The Political Economy of Knowledge , 1998 .

[14]  Ulrike Cress,et al.  A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[15]  Ling Xia,et al.  The interplay between interpersonal and electronic resources in knowledge seeking among co-located and distributed employees , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Mario Calabrese,et al.  From Mechanical to Cognitive View: The Changes of Decision Making in Business Environment , 2018 .

[17]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  Investigating the impact of information systems on knowledge sharing , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Understanding the continuance intention of knowledge sharing in online communities of practice through the post-knowledge-sharing evaluation processes , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Xiao Ma,et al.  Understanding Members’ Active Participation in Online Question-and-Answer Communities: A Theory and Empirical Analysis , 2015, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Factors affecting shapers of organizational wikis , 2010 .

[22]  M. Chi.  Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[23]  F. Caputo,et al.  Information Sharing and Cognitive Involvement for Sustainable Workplaces , 2017 .

[24]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[26]  D. Good,et al.  Individual Ambidexterity: Exploring and Exploiting in Dynamic Contexts , 2013, The Journal of psychology.

[27]  W. Brewer.  Schemas versus mental models in human memory. , 1987 .

[28]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Individual participation in organizational information commons: The impact of team level social influence and technology-specific competence , 2005 .

[29]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  Cognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Lihua Huang,et al.  Drivers of Quantity and Quality of Participation in Online Policy Deliberation Forums , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Understanding Variation in Managers' Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[33]  Laurent Taskin,et al.  Knowledge Management Through the Development of Knowledge Repositories: Towards Work Degradation , 2015 .

[34]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Frances M. T. Brazier,et al.  Exploration of multi-layered knowledge sharing participation: the roles of perceived benefits and costs , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[36]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  Corporate Wikis: The Effects of Owners' Motivation and Behavior on Group Members' Engagement , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Simon Cleveland.  A Causal Model to Predict Organizational Knowledge Sharing via Information and Communication Technologies , 2014 .

[38]  G. S. van Doorn,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF GENERALIZED RECIPROCITY ON SOCIAL INTERACTION NETWORKS , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  D. Hislop.  Knowledge Management in Organizations: A critical introduction , 2005 .

[41]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[42]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  The rhetoric of "knowledge hoarding": a research-based critique , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  A. Hecker,et al.  Knowledge Beyond the Individual? Making Sense of a Notion of Collective Knowledge in Organization Theory , 2012 .

[44]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[45]  R. Rice,et al.  An Integrated Model of Knowledge Sharing in Contemporary Communication Environments , 2009 .

[46]  David R. Brake.  Are We All Online Content Creators Now? Web 2.0 and Digital Divides , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[47]  Maurice Yolles,et al.  Decoding the Dynamics of Value Cocreation in Consumer Tribes: An Agency Theory Approach , 2017, Cybern. Syst..

[48]  Z. Torres,et al.  Fortalecimiento de los procesos de gestión del conocimiento en los grupos de investigación de los departamentos de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Estudio de caso: Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica y Electrónica , 2020 .

[49]  B. V. D. Hooff,et al.  Knowledge sharing in knowledge communities , 2003 .

[50]  Yu-Qian Zhu,et al.  It is more blessed to give than to receive: examining the impact of knowledge sharing on sharers and recipients , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[51]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[52]  R. Kraut,et al.  Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium , 1998 .

[53]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  A Test of the Individual Action Model for Organizational Information Commons , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[54]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd ed. , 2011 .

[55]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Motivations to Resolve Communication Dilemmas in Database-Mediated Collaboration , 2002, Commun. Res..

[56]  O. John,et al.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Katja Hutter,et al.  User Roles and Contributions in Innovation-Contest Communities , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[60]  Sanna Malinen,et al.  Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Production of Collective Action in Alliance-Based Interorganizational Communication and Information Systems , 1998 .

[62]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[63]  Chong Wang,et al.  Network Positions and Contributions to Online Public Goods: The Case of Chinese Wikipedia , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Babajide Osatuyi,et al.  Information sharing on social media sites , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  Towards an integrated framework of intrinsic motivators, extrinsic motivators and knowledge sharing , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  Y. Benkler,et al.  Commons‐based Peer Production and Virtue* , 2006 .

[67]  Hsien-Tung Tsai,et al.  Contribution Behavior in Virtual Communities: Cogntiive, Emotional, and Social Influences , 2014, MIS Q..

[68]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[69]  Youngseek Kim,et al.  Social scientists' data sharing behaviors: Investigating the roles of individual motivations, institutional pressures, and data repositories , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[70]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[71]  P. Ritala,et al.  Knowledge sharing, knowledge leaking and relative innovation performance: An empirical study , 2015 .

[72]  Nick Bontis,et al.  Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[73]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  Wayne E. Baker,et al.  Paying It Forward versus Rewarding Reputation: Mechanisms of Generalized Reciprocity , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[75]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[76]  A. Bandura.  Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. , 1989 .

[77]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Managerial information behaviour: Relationships among Total Quality Management orientation, information use environments, and managerial roles , 2006 .

[78]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations , 2015 .

[79]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  The microlevel actions undertaken by owner-managers in improving the sustainability practices of cultural and creative small and medium enterprises: A United Kingdom–Italy comparison , 2017 .

[80]  Niklas Ravaja,et al.  Why share expertise? A closer look at the quality of motivation to share or withhold knowledge , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[81]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[82]  Kathrin Kirchner,et al.  What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..