Single‐species dynamic site selection

Methods for designing regional reserve networks mostly concentrate on pro- viding maximal representation of species occurring in the region. Representation-based methods, however, typically consider a static snapshot of species incidences, and the spatial dynamics of the species are ignored. It has been empirically demonstrated that reserves designed using representation do not guarantee another important goal of reserve design: long-term persistence. The question studied here is the following: Which subset of sites do you select to maximize the long-term persistence of a species living in a metapopulation, given that each site has a cost and the amount of resource (e.g., money) available is limited? We present an optimization method, which uses a combination of evolutionary optimization (a genetic algorithm) and local search to find the optimal selection of sites. The quality of each candidate solution is evaluated using a spatially realistic metapopulation model, the incidence function model. The proposed method is applied to a metapopulation of the false heath fritillary butterfly, an endangered species in Finland. With this data set, the proposed estimation method produces intuitively acceptable and consistent results within minutes of computation time. Sites favored by the algorithm are located in three patch clusters, and they tend to be inexpensive and initially occupied. Expensive and/or very isolated patches are rarely selected into the optimal site selection.

[1]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Long‐Term Dynamics in a Metapopulation of the American Pika , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single‐species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations , 1991 .

[3]  M Cabeza,et al.  Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  John J. Grefenstette,et al.  Optimization of Control Parameters for Genetic Algorithms , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[5]  Markku Kuitunen,et al.  Selecting networks of nature reserves: methods do affect the long-term outcome , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Schloss Birlinghoven,et al.  How Genetic Algorithms Really Work I.mutation and Hillclimbing , 2022 .

[7]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  2. Predictive and Practical Metapopulation Models: The Incidence Function Approach , 1998 .

[8]  Larry J. Eshelman,et al.  Crossover's Niche , 1993, ICGA.

[9]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  PATCH OCCUPANCY MODELS OF METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFICIENT PARAMETER ESTIMATION USING IMPLICIT STATISTICAL INFERENCE , 1999 .

[10]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Application of a Numerical Algorithm to the Selection of Reserves in Semi-arid New South Wales , 1989 .

[11]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Modelling the viability of metapopulations of the endangered Leadbeater's possum in south-eastern Australia , 1995, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[12]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[13]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[14]  M. Shaffer.  Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation , 1981 .

[15]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  A Habitat‐Based Metapopulation Model of the California Gnatcatcher , 1997 .

[16]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Simulated Evolutionary Optimization and Local Search: Introduction and Application to Tree Search , 2001 .

[18]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Quantitative Incidence Function Model and Persistence of an Endangered Butterfly Metapopulation , 1996 .

[19]  Denis White,et al.  Conservation Prioritization Using GAP Data , 1996 .

[20]  Heinz Mühlenbein,et al.  Predictive Models for the Breeder Genetic Algorithm I. Continuous Parameter Optimization , 1993, Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves , 1997 .

[22]  K. Gaston,et al.  Robustness of reserve selection procedures under temporal species turnover , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Heinz Mühlenbein,et al.  How Genetic Algorithms Really Work: Mutation and Hillclimbing , 1992, PPSN.

[24]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[25]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Predicting the Occurrence of Endangered Species in Fragmented Landscapes , 1996, Science.

[26]  C.J.F. ter Braak,et al.  The incidence function approach to modeling of metapopulation dynamics , 1998 .

[27]  O. H. Frankel,et al.  Conservation and Evolution , 1983 .

[28]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  Planning for Biodiversity , 1998, Science.

[29]  J. Craig.  Viable populations for conservation , 1990 .

[30]  R L Pressey,et al.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[32]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Apparent species turnover, probability of extinction and the selection of nature reserves A case study of the Ingleborough limestone pavements , 1994 .

[33]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[34]  R. Levins.  Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[35]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The equilibrium assumption in estimating the parameters of metapopulation models. , 2000 .

[36]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  An upgraded reserve selection algorithm , 1993 .

[37]  I. Hanski,et al.  Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation , 1998, Nature.

[38]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[39]  I. Hanski.  Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[40]  David A. Keith,et al.  A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis , 1992 .

[41]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Metapopulation viability analysis of the greater glider Petauroides volans in a wood production area , 1994 .

[42]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[43]  Thomas Bäck,et al.  Evolutionary computation: comments on the history and current state , 1997, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[44]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  An Environment‐metapopulation Approach to Population Viability Analysis for a Threatened Invertebrate , 1990 .