Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. II. Community-level modelling

Regional conservation planning can often make more effective use of sparse biological data by linking these data to remotely mapped environmental variables through statistical modelling. While modelling distributions of individual species is the best known and most widely used approach to such modelling, there are many situations in which more information can be extracted from available data by supplementing, or replacing, species-level modelling with modelling of communities or assemblages. This paper provides an overview of approaches to community-level modelling employed in a series of major land-use planning processes in the northeast New South Wales region of Australia, and evaluates how well communities and assemblages derived using these techniques function as surrogates in regional conservation planning. We also outline three new directions that may enhance the effectiveness of community-level modelling by: (1) more closely integrating modelling with traditional ecological mapping (e.g. vegetation mapping); (2) more tightly linking numerical classification and spatial modelling through application of canonical classification techniques; and (3) enhancing the applicability of modelling to data-poor regions through employment of a new technique for modelling spatial pattern in compositional dissimilarity.

[1]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable system of conservation areas in the species‐rich mediterranean‐climate desert of southern Africa , 1999 .

[2]  M. O. Hill,et al.  TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program of arranging multivariate data in an ordered two way table by classification of individual and attributes , 1979 .

[3]  B. Lees,et al.  A new method for predicting vegetation distributions using decision tree analysis in a geographic information system , 1991 .

[4]  M. Niknian,et al.  Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 1993 .

[5]  D. P. Faith,et al.  Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[6]  Seppo Kaitala,et al.  Environmental GIS database for the White Sea , 2002 .

[7]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[8]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Assessing fern diversity: relative species richness and its environmental correlates in Uganda , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[9]  P. Gioia,et al.  Biodiversity assessment: a case study in predicting richness from the potential distributions of plant species in the forests of south‐western Australia , 2000 .

[10]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns , 2002 .

[11]  Elizabeth Finkel,et al.  Software Helps Australia Manage Forest Debate , 1998, Science.

[12]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[13]  T. Yee,et al.  Generalized additive models in plant ecology , 1991 .

[14]  Nicolas W. Hengartner,et al.  Effectiveness of Predicting Breeding Bird Distributions Using Probabilistic Models , 1999 .

[15]  D. Simberloff Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .

[16]  R. Heikkinen,et al.  Species richness of vascular plantsin the subarctic landscape of northern Finland:modelling relationships to the environment , 1997, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[17]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[18]  S L Hui,et al.  Validation techniques for logistic regression models. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[20]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Conservation Priorities and Phylogenetic Pattern , 1996 .

[21]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Application of a taxon priority system for conservation planning by selecting areas which are most distinct from environments already reserved , 1996 .

[23]  S. Ferrier,et al.  Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[24]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Guidelines for using the BioRap methodology and tools , 1995 .

[25]  David A. Keith,et al.  Native vegetation of the South East Forests region, Eden, New South Wales , 1999 .

[26]  S. Morand,et al.  Geographical distances and the similarity among parasite communities of conspecific host populations , 1999, Parasitology.

[27]  I. Hanski Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes , 1999 .

[28]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[29]  D. Fairbanks,et al.  Identifying regional landscapes for conservation planning: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. , 2000 .

[30]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[31]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. , 1990 .

[32]  Kenneth J. Berry,et al.  Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications , 1976 .

[33]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  An analysis of the distribution of plants on granite outcrops in southern Western Australia using Mantel tests , 1987, Vegetatio.

[34]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  The Use of Prior Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood Classification , 1980 .

[35]  James M. Lenihan,et al.  Ecological response surfaces for North American boreal tree species and their use in forest classification , 1993 .

[36]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[37]  M. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating resource selection functions , 2002 .

[38]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[39]  Robert S. Anderson,et al.  Leaf litter inhabiting beetles as surrogates for establishing priorities for conservation of selected tropical montane cloud forests in Honduras, Central America (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae, Curculionidae) , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[40]  John R. Leathwick,et al.  Environmental correlates of tree alpha-diversity in New Zealand primary forests , 1998 .

[41]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information , 2000 .

[42]  R. Alexander,et al.  Vegetation Mapping: From Patch to Planet , 2000 .

[43]  David R. B. Stockwell,et al.  Using induction of decision trees to predict greater glider density. , 1990 .

[44]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife , 1996 .

[45]  Claire Kremen,et al.  Biological Inventory Using Target Taxa: A Case Study of the Butterflies of Madagascar , 1994 .

[46]  J. Franklin Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients , 1995 .

[47]  Lee Belbin,et al.  Semi‐strong Hybrid Scaling, a new ordination algorithm , 1991 .

[48]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[49]  J. Leathwick Are New Zealand's Nothofagus species in equilibrium with their environment? , 1998 .

[50]  Suzanne Winsberg,et al.  Multidimensional scaling with constrained dimensions: CONSCAL , 1997 .

[51]  Lee Belbin,et al.  Selecting representative reserve systems in remote areas: A case study in the Nullarbor region, Australia , 1989 .

[52]  B. L. Baker,et al.  Regional vegetation mapping in Australia: a case study in the practical use of statistical modelling , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[53]  J. M. Eilers,et al.  A Quantitative Method for Delineating Regions: An Example for the Western Corn Belt Plains Ecoregion of the USA , 1997, Environmental management.

[54]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Evolution of Species Diversity in Land Communities , 1977 .

[55]  John R. Leathwick,et al.  Climatic relationships of some New Zealand forest tree species , 1995 .

[56]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[57]  Morné A. du Plessis,et al.  Can species data only be appropriately used to conserve biodiversity? , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[58]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  The practical value of modelling relative abundance of species for regional conservation planning: a case study , 2001 .

[59]  R. Alkemade,et al.  Determining alternative models for vegetation response analysis: a non‐parametric approach , 1998 .

[60]  J. Franklin Predicting the distribution of shrub species in southern California from climate and terrain‐derived variables , 1998 .

[61]  M. Austin,et al.  An Ecological Perspective on Biodiversity Investigations: Examples from Australian Eucalypt Forests , 1998 .

[62]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Diagnostic verification of probability forecasts , 1992 .

[63]  P. Legendre,et al.  MODELING BRAIN EVOLUTION FROM BEHAVIOR: A PERMUTATIONAL REGRESSION APPROACH , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  T. Caro,et al.  On the Use of Surrogate Species in Conservation Biology , 1999 .

[65]  Robert K. Wayne,et al.  The preservation of process: the missing element of conservation programs , 1993 .

[66]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984 .

[67]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[68]  S. Ferrier,et al.  An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression , 2000 .

[69]  B. Gorte,et al.  Probabilistic image classification using geological map units applied to land-cover change detection , 2000 .

[70]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at the nature conservancy (USA) , 1987 .

[71]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[72]  P. Walker,et al.  How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of areas?: on hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches , 1996 .

[73]  John A. Nelder,et al.  Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. , 1993 .

[74]  C. L. Mohler,et al.  Measuring compositional change along gradients , 1983, Vegetatio.

[75]  Curtis H. Flather,et al.  Evaluating performance of regional wildlife habitat models: Implications to resource planning , 1992 .

[76]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression , 2000 .

[77]  S. Ferrier Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? , 2002, Systematic biology.

[78]  Jorge Soberón,et al.  The use of specimen-label databases for conservation purposes: an example using Mexican Papilionid and Pierid butterflies , 2000, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[79]  Lee Belbin,et al.  A new approach to the species classification problem in floristic analysis , 1982 .

[80]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[81]  T. Wohlgemuth Modelling floristic species richness on a regional scale: a case study in Switzerland , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[82]  Jari Oksanen,et al.  Rate of compositional turnover along gradients and total gradient length , 1995 .

[83]  A. D. Gordon A survey of constrained classification , 1996 .

[84]  S. Ferrier,et al.  An evaluation of the predictive performance of distributional models for flora and fauna in north-east New South Wales. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[85]  Wayne S. DeSarbo,et al.  Constrained classification: The use of a priori information in cluster analysis , 1984 .

[86]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance , 1987, Vegetatio.

[87]  Thomas C. Edwards,et al.  Adequacy of Wildlife Habitat Relation Models for Estimating Spatial Distributions of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1996 .

[88]  Brian G. Lees,et al.  Decision-tree and rule-induction approach to integration of remotely sensed and GIS data in mapping vegetation in disturbed or hilly environments , 1991 .

[89]  Anthony Lehmann,et al.  Erratum to “GRASP: generalized regression analysis and spatial prediction” , 2003 .

[90]  S. Ferrier Computer-based spatial extension of forest fauna survey data: current issues, problems and directions , 1991 .

[91]  M. Lawes,et al.  THERE IS LESS TO BINARY MAPS THAN MEETS THE EYE : THE USE OF SPECIES DISTRIBUTION DATA IN THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN SUB-REGION , 1998 .

[92]  D. Cox Two further applications of a model for binary regression , 1958 .

[93]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Randomization and regression methods for testing for associations with geographical, environmental and biological distances between populations , 1986, Researches on Population Ecology.

[94]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[95]  C. Humphries,et al.  MEASURING BIODIVERSITY VALUE FOR CONSERVATION , 1995 .

[96]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  A taxonomic distinctness index and its statistical properties , 1998 .

[97]  A. Lehmann,et al.  Assessing New Zealand fern diversity from spatial predictions of species assemblages , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[98]  G. N. Lance,et al.  REMUL: A New Divisive Polythetic Classificatory Program , 1975, Aust. Comput. J..

[99]  C. Margules,et al.  Biological Models for Monitoring Species Decline: The Construction and Use of Data Bases , 1994 .

[100]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[101]  R. Cowling,et al.  Why is the Cape Peninsula so rich in plant species? An analysis of the independent diversity components , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[102]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement , 2000 .

[103]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  The Relationship Between Sample Similarity and Ecological Distance , 1973 .

[104]  Brendan Mackey,et al.  Assessing the representativeness of the wet tropics of Queensland world heritage property , 1989 .

[105]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Incorporating expert opinion and fine-scale vegetation mapping into statistical models of faunal distribution , 2001 .

[106]  Michael R. Gray,et al.  Spatial turnover in species composition of ground-dwelling arthropods, vertebrates and vascular plants in north-east New South Wales: implications for selection of forest reserves , 1999 .

[107]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[108]  Mike P. Austin,et al.  The potential contribution of vegetation ecology to biodiversity research , 1999 .

[109]  J. Elith Quantitative Methods for Modeling Species Habitat: Comparative Performance and an Application to Australian Plants , 2000 .

[110]  D. Olson,et al.  The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions , 1998 .

[111]  M. Austin,et al.  Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversity , 1996 .

[112]  R L Pressey,et al.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.