Computer-Assisted International Negotiation: A Tool for Research and Practice

This article describes a web-based computer-assisted tool for diagnosing progress in international negotiation. Following a discussion of the need for such a tool, we provide the research sources for its development, present the model on which it is based, describe how it works, and present the results of attempts to validate its diagnoses with case materials. Focusing on flexibility in negotiation, the program consists of questions divided into five categories: issues, parties, delegations, situation, and process. The questions track to variables shown in published studies to influence flexibility. Answers to the questions are processed according to algorithms that include weights derived from the results of a statistical meta-analysis of bargaining studies. An example of the question-answer format and computations leading to the diagnoses are provided. A help function that provides advice for resolving impasses is also described. Strong correspondences between diagnoses generated by the program and actual outcomes obtained in a number of cases attest to the validity of the approach. The article concludes with ideas for further development stimulated by the web-based version of the program.

[1]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[2]  International conflict and behavioral science : the Craigville papers , 1965 .

[3]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. , 1966 .

[4]  B. Bass.  Effects on the subsequent performance of negotiators of studying issues or planning strategies alone or in groups. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[5]  W. Evan,et al.  Interorganizational conflict: a labor-management bargaining experiment , 1967 .

[6]  D. Druckman.  Prenegotiation experience and dyadic conflic resolution in a bargaining situation , 1968 .

[7]  M. Deutsch,et al.  The effects of size of conflict and sex of experimenter upon interpersonal bargaining , 1971 .

[8]  R. Klimoski.  The effects of intragroup forces on intergroup conflict resolution , 1972 .

[9]  D. Druckman,et al.  Salient solutions and the bargaining behavior of representatives and nonrepresentatives , 1973 .

[10]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Determinants of Resolving a Conflict of Interest , 1973 .

[11]  D. Druckman,et al.  Determinants of bargaining behavior in a bilateral monopoly situation II: Opponent's concession rate and similarity , 1976 .

[12]  Bennett Ramberg.  Tactical Advantages of Opening Positioning Strategies , 1977 .

[13]  M Schurr,et al.  Getting it together. , 1979, Nursing times.

[14]  Jacob W. Ulvila,et al.  Negotiation of International Oil Tanker Standards: An Application of Multiattribute Value Theory , 1980, Oper. Res..

[15]  D. Jacobson.  Intraparty Dissensus and Interparty Conflict Resolution , 1981 .

[16]  I. William Zartman,et al.  The Practical Negotiator , 1983 .

[17]  L. Michael Hager,et al.  Getting Together: Building a Relationship that gets to Yes. By Roger Fisher and Scott Brown, Boston, Massachusetts. Houghton Mifflin Company. 1988 , 1988 .

[18]  D. Druckman,et al.  Behavioral aspects of negotiations on mutual security , 1989 .

[19]  D. Druckman,et al.  Turning points in the INF negotiations , 1991 .

[20]  W. Blatchford,et al.  Getting a yes.... , 1992, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[21]  J. A. Wall,et al.  Mediation , 1993 .

[22]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Statistical analysis for negotiation support , 1993 .

[23]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Black-Hat/White-Hat Strategy in Bilateral Negotiation , 1993 .

[24]  G. Matthew Bonham,et al.  Cognitive mapping as a technique for supporting international negotiation , 1993 .

[25]  Dhanesh K. Samarasan.  Analysis, modeling, and the management of international negotiations , 1993 .

[26]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  The Situational Levers of Negotiating Flexibility , 1993 .

[27]  Alexander L. George,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy , 1993 .

[28]  Rebecca J. Bennett,et al.  The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation , 1994 .

[29]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Determinants of Compromising Behavior in Negotiation , 1994 .

[30]  B. Ramberg,et al.  Arms control without negotiation : from the Cold War to the new world order , 1995 .

[31]  Michael Wheeler.  Computers and negotiation: Backing into the future , 1995 .

[32]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Situational Levers of Position Change: Further Explorations , 1995 .

[33]  G. Richard Shell.  Computer-assisted negotiation and mediation: Where we are and where we are going , 1995 .

[34]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Simulating the Lausanne Peace Negotiations, 1922-1923: Power Asymmetries in Bargaining , 1996 .

[35]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  An ESD Computer Culture for Intercultural Problem Solving and Negotiation , 1999 .