Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing

Abstract Five experiments are described on the processing of ambiguous words in sentences. Two classes of ambiguous words (noun-noun and noun-verb) and two types of context (priming and nonpriming) were investigated using a variable stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) priming paradigm. Noun-noun ambiguities have two semantically unrelated readings that are nouns (e.g., PEN, ORGAN); noun-verb ambiguities have both noun and verb readings that are unrelated (e.g., TIRE, WATCH). Priming contexts contain a word highly semantically or associatively related to one meaning of the ambiguous word; nonpriming contexts favor one meaning of the word through other types of information (e.g., syntactic or pragmatic). In nonpriming contexts, subjects consistently access multiple meanings of words and select one reading within 200 msec. Lexical priming differentially affects the processing of subsequent noun-noun and noun-verb ambiguities, yielding selective access of meaning only in the former case. The results suggest that meaning access is an automatic process which is unaffected by knowledge-based (“top-down”) processing. Whether selective or multiple access of meaning is observed largely depends on the structure of the ambiguous word, not the nature of the context.

[1]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[2]  G. Simpson.  Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity , 1981 .

[3]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Studies in the perception of language , 1982 .

[4]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[5]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  The nature of syntactic representation , 1982 .

[6]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The access and processing of idiomatic expressions , 1979 .

[7]  J. Mehler,et al.  Tails of Words: Monitoring Ambiguity , 1978 .

[8]  Herbert Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon: Effects of systematicity and relative frequency of meanings , 1971 .

[9]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[10]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[11]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[12]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[13]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[14]  H S Cairns,et al.  Effects of prior contect on lexical access during sentence comprehension: A replication and reinterpretation , 1980, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  “Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge” , 1979 .

[16]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[17]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of lexical ambiguity resolution in context , 1980 .

[18]  Robert Milne,et al.  Parsing Against Lexical Ambiguity , 1980, COLING.

[19]  W D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.

[20]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Discourse Context and Sentence Perception. , 1981 .

[21]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. , 1979 .

[22]  Ragnhild Söderbergh.  Language by ear and by eye , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  M K Tanenhaus,et al.  Functional clauses and sentence segmentation. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Carol Conrad,et al.  Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[26]  John Seely Brown,et al.  SYSTEMATIC UNDERSTANDING: Synthesis, Analysis, and Contingent Knowledge in Specialized Understanding Systems , 1975 .

[27]  Jean E. Newman,et al.  The phonological nature of phoneme monitoring: A critique of some ambiguity studies , 1978 .

[28]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Time and the spread of activation in memory. , 1977 .

[29]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  Lexical Information Processing During Sentence Comprehension. , 1975 .

[31]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[32]  D. Swinney,et al.  Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias , 1981 .

[33]  Michael Duane,et al.  Speech and Reading. , 1970 .

[34]  R. M. Warren.  Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[35]  Z. Pylyshyn.  The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. , 1981 .

[36]  Gregg C. Oden,et al.  Influence of Context on the Activation and Selection of Ambiguous Word Senses , 1983 .

[37]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[38]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Accessing Ambiguous Words during Sentence Comprehension , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  H. Rollins,et al.  Preferred recall order and recall accuracy for two messages presented simultaneously over a single auditory channel , 1972 .

[40]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[41]  D. Swinney,et al.  Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension. , 1976 .

[42]  M. Garrett,et al.  The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[43]  K. Stanovich.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY , 1980 .

[44]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Prior context and the perception of lexically ambiguous sentences , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[45]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Some effects of context on the comprehension of ambiguous sentences , 1973 .

[47]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[48]  S. Dornič,et al.  Attention and performance V , 1976 .

[49]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sentence processing and the clause boundary , 1978 .

[50]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[51]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[52]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[53]  L. Hasher,et al.  Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .

[54]  R. Solomon,et al.  Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and sentence comprehension , 1975 .

[56]  George R. Marshall,et al.  Stimulus characteristics contributing to organization in free recall , 1967 .

[57]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[58]  R. Cole.  Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech , 1973 .

[59]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Source of Inhibition in Experiments on the Effect of Sentence Context on Word Recognition. , 1982 .

[60]  W. Levelt.  A survey of studies in sentence perception : 1970-1976 , 1978 .

[61]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Mechanisms of sentence context effects in reading: Automatic activation and conscious attention , 1979 .

[62]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[63]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[65]  M. Posner.  Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[66]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Multiple semantic encoding of homophones and homographs in contexts biasing dominant or subordinate meanings , 1978 .

[67]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[68]  A. Koriat,et al.  Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[69]  D E Meyer,et al.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. , 1976, Science.

[70]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[71]  G. Mandler,et al.  INTERACTION OF TWO SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN TACHISTOSCOPIC WORD RECOGNITION. , 1964, Canadian journal of psychology.

[72]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Phrase Structure Grammar , 1982 .

[73]  I. Fischler,et al.  Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .

[74]  D. J. Foss.  Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence comprehension , 1970 .

[75]  Pamela Holley-Wilcox,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Access in the Processing of Isolated Words. , 1980 .

[76]  J. Fodor.  Psychology and Language. , 1970 .

[77]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[78]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[79]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[80]  R. E. Warren,et al.  Stimulus encoding and memory. , 1972 .