Transmission imaging for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography

Abstract.A method developed for registration of ictal and interictal single-photon emission tomography (SPET), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) is described. For SPET studies, technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer (ECD) was injected intravenously while the patient was monitored on video-EEG to document the ictal or interictal state. Imaging was performed using a triple-head gamma camera equipped with a transmission imaging device using a gadolinium-153 source. The images (128×128 pixels, voxel size 3.7×3.7×3.6 mm3) were reconstructed using an iterative algorithm and postfiltered with a Wiener filter. The gold-plated silver electrodes on the patient’s scalp were utilized as markers for registration of the ictal and interictal SPET images, as these metallic markers were clearly seen on the transmission images. Fitting of the marker sets was based on a non-iterative least squares method. The interictal SPET image was subtracted from the ictal image after scaling. The T1-weighted MPRAGE MR images with voxel size of 1.0×1.0×1.0 mm3 were obtained with a 1.5-T scanner. For registration of MR and subtraction SPET images, the external marker set of the ictal SPET study was fitted to the surface of the head segmented from MR images. The SPET registration was tested with a phantom experiment. Registration of ictal and interictal SPET in five patient studies resulted in a 2-mm RMS residual of the marker sets. The estimated RMS error of registration in the final result combining locations of the electrodes, subtraction SPET and MR images was 3–5 mm. In conclusion, transmission imaging can be utilized for an accurate and easily implemented registration procedure for ictal and interictal SPET, MRI and EEG.

[1]  K. S. Arun,et al.  Least-Squares Fitting of Two 3-D Point Sets , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  J S Duncan,et al.  Imaging and epilepsy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  B H Brinkmann,et al.  Subtraction ictal SPET co‐registered to MRI in partial epilepsy: Description and technical validation of the method with phantom and patient studies , 1998, Nuclear medicine communications.

[4]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  P. Jarritt,et al.  A 99Tcm-labelled radiotracer for the investigation of cerebral vascular disease , 1985, Nuclear medicine communications.

[6]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Hierarchical Chamfer Matching: A Parametric Edge Matching Algorithm , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Reconstruction of SPECT images using generalized matrix inverses , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  T. Yousry,et al.  Ictal technetium-99m ethyl cysteinate dimer single-photon emission tomographic findings and propagation of epileptic seizure activity in patients with extratemporal epilepsies , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Medical imaging systems , 1983 .

[10]  V. Poutanen,et al.  Accuracy of a registration procedure for brain SPET and MRI: phantom and simulation studies. , 1997, Nuclear medicine communications.

[11]  D. Bailey Transmission scanning in emission tomography , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.