Reduced Preisach Model: Beyond Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method

The Preisach model, which is formulated as a weighted superposition of hysteresis kernels, has been widely used for hysteresis modeling, especially in smart-material-based actuators. However, in the classical Preisach model, a trade-off is always required between the model accuracy and the number of the hysteresis kernels. To deal with this problem, a model order reduction technique based on the discrete empirical interpolation method (DEIM) has recently been proposed. The method can largely reduce the number of the hysteresis kernels while barely losing the model accuracy. It is noted that the kernel weight in the reduced DEIM-based model can be both positive and negative, which means that the monotonicity of the Preisach model could be lost. The monotonicity is a very important property especially when constructing the inverse Preisach model. Furthermore, the loss of the monotonicity can also deteriorate the model predictability. In the current paper, a modification strategy is proposed. In the modified reduced Preisach model, the DEIM is only employed to select the dominant hysteresis kernels while the corresponding weights of the selected hysteresis kernels are re-identified by solving a constraint optimization problem. Systematic simulation studies and experimental validation are carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

[1]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  A State Space Error Estimate for POD-DEIM Nonlinear Model Reduction , 2012, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[2]  Yuan Wang,et al.  A Valveless Piezoelectric Micropump Based on Projection Micro Litho Stereo Exposure Technology , 2019, IEEE Access.

[3]  Xiaobo Tan,et al.  Kullback-Leibler divergence-based optimal compression of Preisach operator in hysteresis modeling , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[4]  S. Reese,et al.  POD‐based model reduction with empirical interpolation applied to nonlinear elasticity , 2016 .

[5]  Lei Zhang,et al.  A tactile sensor for measuring hardness of soft tissue with applications to minimally invasive surgery , 2017 .

[6]  Jamie Kyujin Paik,et al.  A Novel Torsional Shape Memory Alloy Actuator: Modeling, Characterization, and Control , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[7]  Tianyou Chai,et al.  Compensation of Hysteresis Nonlinearity in Magnetostrictive Actuators With Inverse Multiplicative Structure for Preisach Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[8]  R. Ben Mrad,et al.  On the classical Preisach model for hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators , 2003 .

[9]  R. Melnik,et al.  A phase field approach for the fully coupled thermo-electro-mechanical dynamics of nanoscale ferroelectric actuators , 2018 .

[10]  Murti V. Salapaka,et al.  Construction and Experimental Implementation of a Model-Based Inverse Filter to Attenuate Hysteresis in Ferroelectric Transducers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Optimal compression of generalized Prandtl-Ishlinskii hysteresis models , 2015, Autom..

[12]  Yu Zhang,et al.  An Intelligent Self-Powered Pipeline Inner Spherical Detector With Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting , 2019, IEEE Access.

[13]  R. Melnik,et al.  Vibration energy harvesting based on stress-induced polarization switching: a phase field approach , 2017 .

[14]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  Inverse Compensator for A Simplified Discrete Preisach Model Using Model-Order Reduction Approach , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  John S. Baras,et al.  Modeling and control of hysteresis in magnetostrictive actuators , 2004, Autom..

[16]  R. Iyer,et al.  Control of hysteretic systems through inverse compensation , 2009, IEEE Control Systems.

[17]  Han Ding,et al.  Motion Control of Piezoelectric Positioning Stages: Modeling, Controller Design, and Experimental Evaluation , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[18]  Yun-Jung Lee,et al.  Fast Preisach modeling method for shape memory alloy actuators using major hysteresis loops , 2004 .

[19]  Jan Tommy Gravdahl,et al.  On Implementation of the Preisach Model Identification and Inversion for Hysteresis Compensation , 2015 .

[20]  Danny C. Sorensen,et al.  Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[21]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  Modeling and Compensation of Asymmetric Hysteresis Nonlinearity for Piezoceramic Actuators With a Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Yangmin Li,et al.  Modeling and High Dynamic Compensating the Rate-Dependent Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators via a Novel Modified Inverse Preisach Model , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[23]  J.A. De Abreu-Garcia,et al.  Tracking control of a piezoceramic actuator with hysteresis compensation using inverse Preisach model , 2005, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[24]  H. Bergveld,et al.  Model order reduction of Li-ion batteries via POD and DEIM , 2016 .

[25]  Tao Jin,et al.  A Charge Controller for Synchronous Linear Operation of Multiple Piezoelectric Actuators , 2019, IEEE Access.

[26]  Ulrich Gabbert,et al.  Development of Reduced Preisach Model Using Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[27]  Limin Zhu,et al.  Real-time inverse hysteresis compensation of piezoelectric actuators with a modified Prandtl-Ishlinskii model. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[28]  R. Venkataraman,et al.  Approximate inversion of hysteresis: theory and numerical results [magnetostrictive actuator] , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[29]  Sergej Fatikow,et al.  Modeling and Control of Piezo-Actuated Nanopositioning Stages: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[30]  Zhangxian Deng,et al.  Dynamic Model for Magnetostrictive Systems With Applications to Damper Design , 2018, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.