A Comparative Study to Evaluate Accuracy on Canopy Height and Density Using UAV, ALS, and Fieldwork

Accurate measurement of the tree height and canopy cover density is important for forest biomass and management. Recently, Light Detection and Ranging (LIDAR) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) images have been used to estimate the tree height and canopy cover density for a forest stands. More so, UAV systems with autopilot functions, affordable Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) have created new possibilities, aided by available photogrammetric programs. In this study, we investigated the possibility of data collection methods using an Aerial LIDAR Scanner (ALS) and an UAV together with a fieldworks to evaluate accurate the tree standard metrics in Singyeri, Gyeongjusi, and Gyeongsangbukdo province. The derived metrics via statistical analyses of the ALS and UAV data and validated by field measurements were compared to a published forest type map (scale 1:5000) by the Korea Forest Service; geared towards improving the forest attributes. We collected data and analyzed and compared them with existent the forest type map produced from an aerial photographs and a digital stereo plotter. The ALS data of around 19.5 points·m–2 were collected by an airplane, then processed and classified using the LAStools; while about 362 images of the UAV were processed via Structure from Motion algorithm in the Agisoft Metashape Pro. Thus, we calculated the metrics using the point clouds of both an ALS and an UAV, and then verified their similarity. The fieldwork was manually done on 110 sampled trees. Calculated heights of the UAV were 3.8~5.8 m greater than those for the ALS; and when correlated with the fieldwork, the UAV data overestimated, while the maximum height of the ALS data was more accurate. For the canopy cover, the ALS computed canopy cover was 10%~30% less than that of the UAV. However, the canopy cover above 2 m by an UAV was the best measurement for a forest canopy. Therefore, these results assert that the examined techniques are robust and can significantly complement methods of the conventional data acquisition for the forest type map.

[1]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Thermal and Narrowband Multispectral Remote Sensing for Vegetation Monitoring From an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  P. Gessler,et al.  Automated estimation of individual conifer tree height and crown diameter via two-dimensional spatial wavelet analysis of lidar data , 2006 .

[3]  P. Surový,et al.  Determining tree height and crown diameter from high-resolution UAV imagery , 2017 .

[4]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing ALS and Image-Based Point Cloud Metrics and Modelled Forest Inventory Attributes in a Complex Coastal Forest Environment , 2015 .

[5]  Tomas Brandtberg.  Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[6]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The Utility of Image-Based Point Clouds for Forest Inventory: A Comparison with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2013 .

[7]  Margaret M. Moore,et al.  Evaluating Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Images for Estimating Forest Canopy Fuels in a Ponderosa Pine Stand , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Juan C. Suárez,et al.  Use of airborne LiDAR and aerial photography in the estimation of individual tree heights in forestry , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[9]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Tree height quantification using very high resolution imagery acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and automatic 3D photo-reconstruction methods , 2014 .

[10]  M. Rautiainen,et al.  Estimation of forest canopy cover: A comparison of field measurement techniques , 2006 .

[11]  Xin Shen,et al.  Comparison of UAV LiDAR and Digital Aerial Photogrammetry Point Clouds for Estimating Forest Structural Attributes in Subtropical Planted Forests , 2019, Forests.

[12]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[13]  Detection of Individual Trees and Estimation of Mean Tree Height using Airborne LIDAR Data , 2012 .

[14]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Airborne laser scanning and digital stereo imagery measures of forest structure: comparative results and implications to forest mapping and inventory update , 2013 .

[15]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[16]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR , 2017, Sensors.

[17]  Camillo Ressl,et al.  Digital Photogrammetric Camera Evaluation - Generation of Di- gital Elevation Models , 2010 .

[18]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  A Novel Methodology to Estimate Single-Tree Biophysical Parameters from 3D Digital Imagery Compared to Aerial Laser Scanner Data , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Xin Shen,et al.  Assessment of Individual Tree Detection and Canopy Cover Estimation using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle based Light Detection and Ranging (UAV-LiDAR) Data in Planted Forests , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[20]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods , 2006 .

[21]  D. Roberts,et al.  Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape , 2004 .

[22]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[23]  P. Gong,et al.  Detection of individual trees and estimation of tree height using LiDAR data , 2007, Journal of Forest Research.

[24]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Development of a UAV-LiDAR System with Application to Forest Inventory , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Qin Ma,et al.  Comparison of Canopy Cover Estimations From Airborne LiDAR, Aerial Imagery, and Satellite Imagery , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[26]  M. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2013 .

[27]  Sakari Tuominen,et al.  Forest variable estimation using a high-resolution digital surface model , 2012 .

[28]  C. Schmullius,et al.  Comparison of UAV photograph-based and airborne lidar-based point clouds over forest from a forestry application perspective , 2017 .

[29]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[30]  Jörgen Wallerman,et al.  Forest variable estimation using photogrammetric matching of digital aerial images in combination with a high-resolution DEM , 2012 .

[31]  Michael G. Wing,et al.  Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) for Individual Tree Stem Location, Height, and Biomass Measurements , 2011, Remote. Sens..