A nested loop for simultaneous model topology screening, parameters estimation, and identification of the optimal number of experiments: Application to a Simulated Moving Bed unit

Simulated Moving Bed (SMB) chromatography is a well-known technique for the resolution of several high-value-added compounds. Parameters identification and model topology definition are arduous when one is dealing with complex systems such as a Simulated Moving Bed unit. Moreover, the large number of experiments necessary might be an expansive-long process. Hence, this work proposes a novel methodology for parameter estimation, screening the most suitable topology of the model’s sink -source (defined by the adsorption isotherm equation) and defining the minimum number of experiments necessary to identify the model. Therefore, a nested loop optimization problem is proposed with three levels considering the three main goals of the work: parameters estimation; topology screening by isotherm definition; minimum number of experiments necessary to yield a precise model. The proposed methodology emulated a real scenario by introducing noise in the data and using a Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) approach. Data reconciliation and uncertainty evaluation add robustness to the parameter estimation adding precision and reliability to the model. The methodology is validated considering experimental data from literature apart from the samples applied for parameter estimation, following a cross-validation. The results corroborate that it is possible to carry out trustworthy parameter estimation directly from an SMB unit with minimal system knowledge.

[1]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for chromatography model parameters by Bayesian inference using sequential Monte Carlo method , 2021, Chemical Engineering Research and Design.

[2]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Utilization of operation data for parameter estimation of simulated moving bed chromatography , 2021, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing.

[3]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Global Approach for Simulated Moving Bed Model Identification: Design of Experiments, Uncertainty Evaluation, and Optimization Strategy Assessment , 2021 .

[4]  Matthew J. Realff,et al.  Bayesian design of experiments for adsorption isotherm modeling , 2020, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[5]  David S. Sholl,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for adsorption isotherm parameter determination , 2020 .

[6]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Separation of nadolol racemates by high pH reversed-phase preparative chromatography , 2020, Separation and Purification Technology.

[7]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Chromatographic studies of n-Propyl Propionate, Part II: Synthesis in a fixed bed adsorptive reactor, modelling and uncertainties determination , 2019, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Hannu Koivisto,et al.  Optimization of a True Moving Bed unit and determination of its feasible operating region using a novel Sliding Particle Swarm Optimization , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[9]  Yogesh V. Joshi,et al.  Aromatics/Alkanes separation: Simulated moving bed process model development by a concurrent approach and its validation in a mini-plant , 2019, Separation and Purification Technology.

[10]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Improving the performance of nadolol stereoisomers' preparative separation using Chiralpak IA by SMB chromatography. , 2018, Chirality.

[11]  Hannu Koivisto,et al.  Chromatographic studies of n-Propyl Propionate: Adsorption equilibrium, modelling and uncertainties determination , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Marcio Schwaab,et al.  Adsorption equilibrium models: Computation of confidence regions of parameter estimates , 2018, Chemical Engineering Research and Design.

[13]  I. Nogueira Optimization and control of TMB, SMB and SMBR units , 2018 .

[14]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Dynamic response to process disturbances - A comparison between TMB/SMB models in transient regime , 2017, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  José P. S. Aniceto,et al.  General optimization strategy of simulated moving bed units through design of experiments and response surface methodologies , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[16]  S. Mun Effect of adsorbent particle size on the relative merits of a non-triangular and a triangular separation region in the optimal design of a three-zone simulated moving bed chromatography for binary separation with linear isotherms. , 2016, Journal of chromatography. A.

[17]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Separation of Nadolol Stereoisomers Using Chiralpak IA Chiral Stationary Phase. , 2016, Chirality.

[18]  Gaurav Agrawal,et al.  Full Superstructure for Multiobjective Optimization of Multicolumn Chromatography for Ternary Separations , 2015 .

[19]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Simultaneous modeling and optimization of nonlinear simulated moving bed chromatography by the prediction-correction method. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[20]  Brahim Benyahia,et al.  Emulsion copolymerization of styrene and butyl acrylate in the presence of a chain transfer agent. Part 2: parameters estimability and confidence regions , 2013 .

[21]  S. Mun Development of a non-triangular separation region for improving the performance of a three-zone simulated moving bed chromatography for binary separation with linear isotherms. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[22]  Pedro Sá Gomes,et al.  Chiral separation of flurbiprofen enantiomers by preparative and simulated moving bed chromatography. , 2011, Chirality.

[23]  Graça Martins,et al.  Análise de Dados , 2011 .

[24]  M. Kinnaert,et al.  Parametric uncertainties and influence of the dead volume representation in modelling simulated moving bed separation processes. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  M. Kinnaert,et al.  Modelling and parametric estimation of simulated moving bed chromatographic processes (SMB) , 2009 .

[26]  Jean Rouquerol,et al.  Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems , 2008 .

[27]  E. Biscaia,et al.  Nonlinear parameter estimation through particle swarm optimization , 2008 .

[28]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  A systematic approach to SMB processes model identification from batch experiments , 2007 .

[29]  M. Juza,et al.  Less common applications of simulated moving bed chromatography in the pharmaceutical industry. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[30]  Derya B. Özyurt,et al.  Theory and practice of simultaneous data reconciliation and gross error detection for chemical processes , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[31]  Vera G. Mata,et al.  Separation of ternary mixtures by pseudo-simulated moving bed chromatography. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[32]  L. Biegler,et al.  Redescending estimators for data reconciliation and parameter estimation , 2001 .

[33]  Shankar Narasimhan,et al.  Data reconciliation & gross error detection: an intelligent use of process data , 1999 .

[34]  J. Blehaut,et al.  Recent aspects in simulated moving bed , 1998 .

[35]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Optimal operation of simulated moving-bed units for non-linear chromatographic separations: II. Bi-Langmuir isotherm , 1998 .

[36]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Optimal operation of simulated moving bed units for nonlinear chromatographic separations , 1997 .

[37]  C. M. Crowe,et al.  Data reconciliation — Progress and challenges , 1996 .

[38]  Richard S. H. Mah,et al.  Generalized likelihood ratio method for gross error identification , 1987 .

[39]  D. Graham The Characterization of Physical Adsorption Systems. I. The Equilibrium Function and Standard Free Energy of Adsorption , 1953 .

[40]  Luís Manuel Santos Pais,et al.  Chiral separation by simulated moving bed chromatography , 1999 .

[41]  Luís S. Pais,et al.  Separation of 1,1'-bi-2-naphthol enantiomers by continuous chromatography in simulated moving bed , 1997 .

[42]  E. Iso Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1993 .