Transporting Deformations of Face Emotions in the Shape Spaces: A Comparison of Different Approaches

Studying the changes of shape is a common concern in many scientific fields. We address here two problems: (1) quantifying the deformation between two given shapes and (2) transporting this deformation to morph a third shape. These operations can be done with or without point correspondence, depending on the availability of a surface matching algorithm, and on the type of mathematical procedure adopted. In computer vision, the re-targeting of emotions mapped on faces is a common application. We contrast here four different methods used for transporting the deformation toward a target once it was estimated upon the matching of two shapes. These methods come from very different fields such as computational anatomy, computer vision and biology. We used the large diffeomorphic deformation metric mapping and thin plate spline, in order to estimate deformations in a deformational trajectory of a human face experiencing different emotions. Then we use naive transport (NT), linear shift (LS), direct transport (DT) and fanning scheme (FS) to transport the estimated deformations toward four alien faces constituted by 240 homologous points and identifying a triangulation structure of 416 triangles. We used both local and global criteria for evaluating the performance of the 4 methods, e.g., the maintenance of the original deformation. We found DT, LS and FS very effective in recovering the original deformation while NT fails under several aspects in transporting the shape change. As the best method may differ depending on the application, we recommend carefully testing different methods in order to choose the best one for any specific application.

[1]  S Gabriele,et al.  Evaluation of the strain-line patterns in a human left ventricle: a simulation study , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Shape Analysis of Elastic Curves in Euclidean Spaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Jonathan Pokrass,et al.  Partial Shape Matching Without Point-Wise Correspondence , 2013 .

[4]  I. Dryden,et al.  Non-Euclidean statistics for covariance matrices, with applications to diffusion tensor imaging , 2009, 0910.1656.

[5]  L. Younes Shapes and Diffeomorphisms , 2010 .

[6]  Kieran P. McNulty,et al.  Developmental simulation of the adult cranial morphology of Australopithecus sediba , 2016 .

[7]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Time sequence diffeomorphic metric mapping and parallel transport track time-dependent shape changes , 2009, NeuroImage.

[9]  L Teresi,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of functional strain lines in the real human left ventricle via speckle tracking echocardiography. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Stefan Schlager,et al.  Morpho and Rvcg – Shape Analysis in R: R-Packages for Geometric Morphometrics, Shape Analysis and Surface Manipulations , 2017 .

[11]  P. Piras,et al.  Testing evolutionary stasis and trends in first lower molar shape of extinct Italian populations of Terricola savii (Arvicolidae, Rodentia) by means of geometric morphometrics , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[12]  L. Teresi,et al.  Digging adaptation in insectivorous subterranean eutherians. The enigma of Mesoscalops montanensis unveiled by geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis , 2015, Journal of morphology.

[13]  Huiling Le,et al.  Unrolling Shape Curves , 2003 .

[14]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  A New 4D Trajectory-Based Approach Unveils Abnormal LV Revolution Dynamics in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy , 2015, PloS one.

[15]  I. Dryden,et al.  Shape-space smoothing splines for planar landmark data , 2007 .

[16]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The emerging discipline of Computational Functional Anatomy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  Fred L Bookstein,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance-based morphometrics and ventricular dysmorphology in schizophrenia , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[18]  Maxime Sermesant,et al.  Symmetric Algorithmic Components for Shape Analysis with Diffeomorphisms , 2019, GSI.

[19]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Hamiltonian Systems and Optimal Control in Computational Anatomy: 100 Years Since D'Arcy Thompson. , 2015, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Parallel Transport of Deformations in Shape Space of Elastic Surfaces , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[21]  S. Schlager,et al.  Retrodeformation of fossil specimens based on 3D bilateral semi-landmarks: Implementation in the R package “Morpho” , 2018, PloS one.

[22]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  International Journal of Computer Vision manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Geodesics, Parallel Transport & One-parameter Subgroups for Diffeomorphic Image Registration , 2022 .

[23]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Geodesic Shooting for Computational Anatomy , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[24]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  4D-Analysis of Left Ventricular Heart Cycle Using Procrustes Motion Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[26]  Stanley Durrleman,et al.  Parallel transport in shape analysis: a scalable numerical scheme , 2017, GSI.

[27]  I. Holopainen Riemannian Geometry , 1927, Nature.

[28]  P. Piras,et al.  Current Options for Visualization of Local Deformation in Modern Shape Analysis Applied to Paleobiological Case Studies , 2020, Frontiers in Earth Science.

[29]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[30]  Alain Trouvé,et al.  Diffeomorphisms Groups and Pattern Matching in Image Analysis , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  P. Gunz,et al.  Semilandmarks: a method for quantifying curves and surfaces , 2013 .

[32]  L. Younes,et al.  Diffeomorphometry and geodesic positioning systems for human anatomy. , 2014, Technology.

[33]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  Homeostatic Left Heart integration and disintegration links atrio-ventricular covariation’s dyshomeostasis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  COMPARING SHAPE TRAJECTORIES OF BIOLOGICAL SOFT TISSUES IN THE SIZE-AND-SHAPE SPACE , 2015 .

[35]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  Calculus of Nonrigid Surfaces for Geometry and Texture Manipulation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[36]  Axel Munk,et al.  Intrinsic MANOVA for Riemannian Manifolds with an Application to Kendall's Space of Planar Shapes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[37]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  The TPS Direct Transport: A New Method for Transporting Deformations in the Size-and-Shape Space , 2017, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[38]  Stefano Gabriele,et al.  Left Atrial trajectory impairment in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy disclosed by Geometric Morphometrics and Parallel Transport , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Hans Hagen,et al.  Visualization and Processing of Tensor Fields , 2014 .

[40]  A. Trouvé,et al.  Comparison of the endocranial ontogenies between chimpanzees and bonobos via temporal regression and spatiotemporal registration. , 2012, Journal of human evolution.

[41]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Efficient Parallel Transport in the Group of Diffeomorphisms via Reduction to the Lie Algebra , 2017, GRAIL/MFCA/MICGen@MICCAI.

[42]  Paul Jusselin,et al.  A Fanning Scheme for the Parallel Transport along Geodesics on Riemannian Manifolds , 2018, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[43]  Stefano Soatto,et al.  A New Geometric Metric in the Space of Curves, and Applications to Tracking Deforming Objects by Prediction and Filtering , 2011, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[44]  Luciano Teresi,et al.  The elastic metric: A review of elasticity with large distortions , 2013 .