Conformational transition in signal transduction: metastable states and transition pathways in the activation of a signaling protein.

Signal transduction is of vital importance to the growth and adaptation of living organisms. The key to understand mechanisms of biological signal transduction is elucidation of the conformational dynamics of its signaling proteins, as the activation of a signaling protein is fundamentally a process of conformational transition from an inactive to an active state. A predominant form of signal transduction for bacterial sensing of environmental changes in the wild or inside their hosts is a variety of two-component systems, in which the conformational transition of a response regulator (RR) from an inactive to an active state initiates responses to the environmental changes. Here, RR activation has been investigated using RR468 as a model system by extensive unbiased all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in explicit solvent, starting from snapshots along a targeted MD trajectory that covers the conformational transition. Markov state modeling, transition path theory, and geometric analyses of the wealth of the MD data have provided a comprehensive description of the RR activation. It involves a network of metastable states, with one metastable state essentially the same as the inactive state and another very similar to the active state that are connected via a small set of intermediates. Five major pathways account for >75% of the fluxes of the conformational transition from the inactive to the active-like state. The thermodynamic stability of the states and the activation barriers between states are found, to identify rate-limiting steps. The conformal transition is initiated predominantly by movements of the β3α3 loop, followed by movements of the β4α4-loop and neighboring α4 helix region, and capped by additional movements of the β3α3 loop. A number of transient hydrophobic and hydrogen bond interactions are revealed, and they may be important for the conformational transition.

[1]  R. Bourret.  Receiver domain structure and function in response regulator proteins. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[2]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Kirsten Jung,et al.  Histidine kinases and response regulators in networks. , 2012, Current opinion in microbiology.

[4]  Francesca Fanelli,et al.  Wordom: A User-Friendly Program for the Analysis of Molecular Structures, Trajectories, and Free Energy Surfaces , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[5]  V. Pande,et al.  Network models for molecular kinetics and their initial applications to human health , 2010, Cell Research.

[6]  D E Wemmer,et al.  Two-state allosteric behavior in a single-domain signaling protein. , 2001, Science.

[7]  D. Koshland.  The Key–Lock Theory and the Induced Fit Theory , 1995 .

[8]  C. Schütte,et al.  Supplementary Information for “ Constructing the Equilibrium Ensemble of Folding Pathways from Short Off-Equilibrium Simulations ” , 2009 .

[9]  Thomas J Lane,et al.  MSMBuilder2: Modeling Conformational Dynamics at the Picosecond to Millisecond Scale. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[10]  R. Cukier,et al.  Conformational transition of response regulator RR468 in a two-component system signal transduction process. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  Kyle A. Beauchamp,et al.  Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39). , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Vladimir A. Zorich.  Elements of the theory , 2011 .

[13]  Q. Cui,et al.  Reconciling the “old” and “new” views of protein allostery: A molecular simulation study of chemotaxis Y protein (CheY) , 2006, Proteins.

[14]  Xuhui Huang,et al.  Dynamics of an intrinsically disordered protein reveal metastable conformations that potentially seed aggregation. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  G. de Fabritiis,et al.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  C. Brooks,et al.  Native states of fast-folding proteins are kinetic traps. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  Vincent A. Voelz,et al.  Slow unfolded-state structuring in Acyl-CoA binding protein folding revealed by simulation and experiment. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[19]  F. Noé,et al.  Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational change in macromolecules. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[20]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  Identification of side-chain clusters in protein structures by a graph spectral method. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Xuhui Huang,et al.  Dynamics of pyrophosphate ion release and its coupled trigger loop motion from closed to open state in RNA polymerase II. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  S. Takada,et al.  Dynamic energy landscape view of coupled binding and protein conformational change: Induced-fit versus population-shift mechanisms , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Pathways for conformational change in nitrogen regulatory protein C from discrete path sampling. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[24]  N. Hatzakis,et al.  Single molecule insights on conformational selection and induced fit mechanism. , 2014, Biophysical chemistry.

[25]  Molecular Dynamic Simulations of the N-Terminal Receiver Domain of NtrC Reveal Intrinsic Conformational Flexibility in the Inactive State , 2006, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[26]  K Henrick,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions , 2022 .

[27]  Liang Ma,et al.  Activation mechanism of a signaling protein at atomic resolution from advanced computations. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[29]  F. J. Luque,et al.  Protein flexibility and ligand recognition: challenges for molecular modeling. , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Shuanghong Huo,et al.  Graph representation of protein free energy landscape. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  Vincent A. Voelz,et al.  Atomistic folding simulations of the five-helix bundle protein λ(6−85). , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  Kyle A. Beauchamp,et al.  Markov state model reveals folding and functional dynamics in ultra-long MD trajectories. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[33]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[34]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[35]  G. Bowman,et al.  Equilibrium fluctuations of a single folded protein reveal a multitude of potential cryptic allosteric sites , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[37]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Sending Signals Dynamically , 2009, Science.

[38]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[39]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Large conformational changes in proteins: signaling and other functions. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[40]  Ann M Stock,et al.  A New Perspective on Response Regulator Activation , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[41]  Ronald M Levy,et al.  Insights into the dynamics of HIV-1 protease: a kinetic network model constructed from atomistic simulations. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  V. Rubio,et al.  The mechanism of signal transduction by two-component systems. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[43]  V. Pande,et al.  Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[44]  Alberto Marina,et al.  Structural Insight into Partner Specificity and Phosphoryl Transfer in Two-Component Signal Transduction , 2009, Cell.

[45]  Wladimir Labeikovsky,et al.  Transient Non-native Hydrogen Bonds Promote Activation of a Signaling Protein , 2009, Cell.

[46]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Reactive flux and folding pathways in network models of coarse-grained protein dynamics. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[47]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Simple few-state models reveal hidden complexity in protein folding , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Frank Noé,et al.  Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[49]  Xuhui Huang,et al.  Using generalized ensemble simulations and Markov state models to identify conformational states. , 2009, Methods.

[50]  Igor B Zhulin,et al.  Evolution and phyletic distribution of two-component signal transduction systems. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[51]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Transition-path theory and path-finding algorithms for the study of rare events. , 2010, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[52]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Mapping the conformational transition in Src activation by cumulating the information from multiple molecular dynamics trajectories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  P. Deuflhard,et al.  Robust Perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics , 2005 .

[54]  Kyle A. Beauchamp,et al.  Quantitative comparison of villin headpiece subdomain simulations and triplet–triplet energy transfer experiments , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Protein folded states are kinetic hubs , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Dahlia R. Weiss,et al.  Millisecond dynamics of RNA polymerase II translocation at atomic resolution , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Daniel R Roe,et al.  PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: Software for Processing and Analysis of Molecular Dynamics Trajectory Data. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[58]  Rahul Banerjee,et al.  Transition paths of Met-enkephalin from Markov state modeling of a molecular dynamics trajectory. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[59]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Segmented transition pathway of the signaling protein nitrogen regulatory protein C. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  P. Hänggi,et al.  Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers , 1990 .

[61]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Simulating oligomerization at experimental concentrations and long timescales: A Markov state model approach. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.