Enrollees choose priorities for Medicare.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and results of ascertaining Medicare enrollees' priorities for insured medical benefits. DESIGN AND METHODS Structured group exercises were conducted with Medicare enrollees from clinical and community settings in central North Carolina. By participating in a decision exercise, CHAT: Choosing Healthplans All Together, individuals and groups chose medical benefits within the constraints of a monthly Medicare + Choice premium. The acceptability of the exercise and the resulting benefit package were assessed. RESULTS Ten groups (121 individuals) made trade-offs that involved the selection of more tightly managed care in order to add pharmacy, dental, and long-term care benefits. All were willing to forgo experimental therapy; 7 groups gave priority to insuring the uninsured. Participants found the exercise overwhelmingly acceptable and were willing to abide by their groups' choices. IMPLICATIONS Medicare enrollees are able to come to consensus about financially constrained benefit packages that may be useful in reform of the Medicare program.

[1]  P. F. Short,et al.  Betwixt and between: targeting coverage reforms to those approaching Medicare. , 2001, Health affairs.

[2]  A. Felsenfeld Less is not more. , 2005, Journal of the California Dental Association.

[3]  J. Lynn,et al.  MediCaring: Development and Test Marketing of a Supportive Care Benefit for Older People , 1999, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  J. Wilson Medicare managed care: consumers' perspectives. , 1998, Clinical therapeutics.

[5]  B. Vladeċk Learn nothing, forget nothing--the Medicare Commission redux. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  G. Wilensky Medicare reform--now is the time. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Myrna Silverman,et al.  Medicare HMOs , 2000, Journal of health & social policy.

[8]  J. Iglehart Changing health insurance trends. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  J. Garrett,et al.  Older Medicare Enrolees' Choices for Insured Services , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  C. Green,et al.  A Limited Entitlement for Community Care , 2001, Journal of Aging & Social Policy.

[11]  P. Pine,et al.  Health care use by Medicare's disabled enrollees , 1986, Health care financing review.

[12]  Rosenbach Ml,et al.  Variations in Medicare Access and Satisfaction by Health Status: 1991-93 , 1995 .

[13]  Out-of-pocket spending on health care by Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older: 1999 projections. , 1999, Issue Brief (Public Policy Institute (American Association of Retired Persons)).

[14]  Richard D. Duke,et al.  Principles and practices of gaming-simulation , 1981 .

[15]  J. Iglehart,et al.  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services , 2020, Definitions.

[16]  Vistnes Jp,et al.  The demand for Medicare supplemental insurance benefits: the role of attitudes toward medical care and risk. , 1997 .

[17]  A. McMillan,et al.  A Study of the “Crossover Population”: Aged Persons Entitled to Both Medicare and Medicaid , 1983, Health care financing review.

[18]  J. Bernstein,et al.  Supplemental health insurance for Medicare beneficiaries. , 1999, Medicare brief.

[19]  F. O. Chima Infant Mortality, Class, Race and Gender , 2001, Journal of health & social policy.