Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an increasingly important index for decision making with respect to revascularization of coronary artery stenosis. It is the gold standard to indicate whether a particular stenosis is responsible for inducible ischemia and it is generally accepted that a stenosis with an ischemic value of FFR is responsible for angina pectoris and a worse outcome, and should be revascularized, whereas lesions with a non-ischemic FFR have a more favorable prognosis and can better be treated medically. In this review paper, the background, concept and clinical application of FFR are discussed from a practical point of view. On top of that, some in-depth considerations are given with respect to further possibilities of FFR for examining the coronary circulation, including separate assessment of coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flows. Finally, a word of caution is given with respect to using resting pressure indexes, which seem attractive because they avoid the need for hyperemia, but negatively affect the accuracy of the measurements. This review can be read as an overview of the state-of-the-art of FFR and as a guide to further reading. 

[1]  P. Damman,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Intracoronary Pressure and Flow Velocity Information During Baseline Conditions: Adenosine-Free Assessment of Functional Coronary Lesion Severity , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[3]  T van der Werf,et al.  Mean transit time for the assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry. , 1990, Circulation.

[4]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Disease , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Colin Berry,et al.  VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  A. Hughes,et al.  Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  W. Wijns,et al.  Intracoronary and Intravenous Adenosine 5′-Triphosphate, Adenosine, Papaverine, and Contrast Medium to Assess Fractional Flow Reserve in Humans , 2003, Circulation.

[9]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[10]  O. Penn,et al.  Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Nobuhiro Tanaka,et al.  Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it? , 2013, European heart journal.

[13]  B. Bruyne,et al.  Coronary Pressure , 1997, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[14]  B Meier,et al.  Coronary collateral quantitation in patients with coronary artery disease using intravascular flow velocity or pressure measurements. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  W Wijns,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve to Determine the Appropriateness of Angioplasty in Moderate Coronary Stenosis: A Randomized Trial , 2001, Circulation.

[16]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  K. Gould,et al.  Abnormal Epicardial Coronary Resistance in Patients With Diffuse Atherosclerosis but “Normal” Coronary Angiography , 2001, Circulation.

[18]  D. Berman,et al.  Gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in the clinical outcomes utilizing revascularization and aggressive drug evaluation (COURAGE) trial, Veterans Administration Cooperative study no. 424 , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[19]  M. Siebes,et al.  Does the instantaneous wave-free ratio approximate the fractional flow reserve? , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[21]  O. Marroquin,et al.  Clinical utility of regadenoson for assessing fractional flow reserve. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[22]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .

[23]  B. Gersh Functional SYNTAX Score for Risk Assessment in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease , 2012 .

[24]  L. Shaw,et al.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[25]  N Doba,et al.  Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Moderate Coronary Artery Stenoses: Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve , 2000, Circulation.

[26]  N. Pijls,et al.  Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  MasayukiAbe,et al.  Diastolic Fractional Flow Reserve to Assess the Functional Severity of Moderate Coronary Artery Stenoses , 2000 .

[28]  K. Oldroyd,et al.  Pharmacological options for inducing maximal hyperaemia during studies of coronary physiology , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[29]  N. Pijls,et al.  The crux of maximum hyperemia: the last remaining barrier for routine use of fractional flow reserve. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[30]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.