An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.

Current flat-panel detectors either directly convert x-ray energy to electronic charge or use indirect conversion with an intermediate optical process. The purpose of this work was to compare direct and indirect detectors in terms of their modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE). Measurements were made on three flat-panel detectors, Hologic Direct-Ray DR-1000 (DRC), GE Revolution XQ/i (XQ/i), and Philips Digital Diagnost (DiDi) using the IEC-defined RQA5 (approximately 74 kVp, 21 mm Al) and RQA9 (approximately 120 kVp, 40 mm Al) radiographic techniques. The presampled MTFs of the systems were measured using an edge method [Samei et al., Med. Phys. 25, 102 (1998)]. The NPS of the systems were determined for a range of exposure levels by two-dimensional (2D) Fourier analysis of uniformly exposed radiographs [Flynn and Samei, Med. Phys. 26, 1612 (1999)]. The DQEs were assessed from the measured MTF, NPS, exposure, and estimated ideal signal-to-noise ratios. For the direct system, the MTF was found to be significantly higher than that for the indirect systems and very close to an ideal function associated with the detector pixel size. The NPS for the direct system was found to be constant in relation to frequency. For the XQ/i and DRC systems, the DQE results reflected expected differences based on the absorption efficiency of the different detector materials. Using RQA5, the measured DQE values in the diagonal (and axial) direction(s) at spatial frequencies of 0.15 mm(-1) and 2.5 mm(-1) were 64% (64%) and 20% (15%) for the XQ/i system, and 38% (38%) and 20% (20%) for the DRC, respectively. The DQE results of the DiDi system were difficult to interpret due to additional preprocessing steps in that system.

[1]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Improved imaging performance of a 14"x17" direct radiography system using a Se/TFT detector , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[2]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[3]  N J Hangiandreou,et al.  Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[5]  Larry E. Antonuk,et al.  Improved spatial resolution in flat-panel imaging systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[7]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  DQE of direct and indirect digital radiography systems , 2001 .

[8]  Jerzy Kanicki,et al.  Effect of secondary radiations on the performance of digital radiographic detectors , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Isaias D. Job,et al.  Characterization of a third-generation multimode sensor panel , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Richard Aufrichtig,et al.  DQE(f) of an amorphous-silicon flat-panel x-ray detector: detector parameter influences and measurement methodology , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Kenneth A Fetterly,et al.  Measurement of the presampled two-dimensional modulation transfer function of digital imaging systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Development of a novel high-resolution direct conversion x-ray detector , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[13]  I. Blevis,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: construction and evaluation of a prototype real-time detector. , 1997, Medical physics.

[14]  D. Hoeschen.  DQE of digital x-ray imaging systems: a challenge for standardization , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[16]  J A Rowlands,et al.  X-ray detectors for digital radiography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[18]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[19]  E. Samei,et al.  Experimental comparison of noise and resolution for 2k and 4k storage phosphor radiography systems. , 1999, Medical physics.

[20]  E. W. Shrigley.  Medical Physics , 1944, British medical journal.

[21]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[22]  A R Cowen,et al.  A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography. , 1998, Medical physics.

[23]  Arnold R. Cowen,et al.  Image quality evaluation of a direct digital radiography detector operating in a UK radiology department , 1999, Medical Imaging.