Design considerations and functional analysis of local reserve energy markets for distributed generation

In this paper we develop an auction mechanism that is designed for a local energy market. It aims to enable regionally or virtually restricted trading of ancillary services, which enhances the position of the balance group responsible party beyond that of simple accounting. Furthermore, it makes local market participants somewhat more independent from the transmission grid operator, but at the same time provides incentives for investments in distributed generation technologies. A wider spread of these technologies can help to save CO2 emissions, while at the same time a part of them can also be used to counter the fluctuations of energy from volatile renewable sources, such as wind and solar power. Because of their relatively high margins and small share in total production, ancillary services are well-suited for a remuneration scheme. Participants in the auction are, thus, private households, which impose specific design characteristics on the auction. Most importantly, it needs to be transparent and easy to understand, as homeowners will typically not have the insights of a professional trader as well as lack a similar position and motivation. Also, the confinement to a single balance group, i.e. a local market, means that especially in the beginning of the trading only a small number of bidders can be expected. Therefore, competition will initially be limited, so that the auction design needs to be adapted accordingly. In order to test the performance of the proposed auction market design under varying information policies, a simple agentbased simulation program has been developed. We find that the theoretical predictions hold and that competition quickly leads to price convergence.

[1]  Jaime F. Zender,et al.  Auctioning divisible goods , 2002 .

[2]  R. Selten,et al.  End behavior in sequences of finite prisoner's dilemma supergames , 1986 .

[3]  Jim Watson,et al.  Strategies for the deployment of micro-generation: Implications for social acceptance , 2007 .

[4]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Feedback, punishment and cooperation in public good experiments , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[5]  Competition and Cooperation in Divisible Good Auctions: An Experimental Examination , 2004 .

[6]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Electricity market modeling trends , 2005 .

[7]  Leigh Tesfatsion,et al.  Co-learning patterns as emergent market phenomena: An electricity market illustration , 2012 .

[8]  Vernon L. Smith Bidding Theory and the Treasury Bill Auction: Does Price Discrimination Increase Bill Prices? , 1966 .

[9]  Harry Singh Auctions for ancillary services , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Design of Divisible Good Markets , 2010 .

[11]  Jakub Kastl Discrete Bids and Empirical Inference in Divisible Good Auctions , 2011 .

[12]  M. Genoese,et al.  Agent-based simulation of electricity markets: a literature review , 2007 .

[13]  Armin Schnettler,et al.  Market Potential Analysis for the Provision of Balancing Reserve with a Fleet of Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[14]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  The Role of Information Feedback in Local Reserve Energy Auction Markets , 2013 .

[15]  Isabel Praça,et al.  Mascem: A Multiagent System That Simulates Competitive Electricity Markets , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[16]  Roberto A. Weber 'Learning' with no feedback in a competitive guessing game , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  Carlos Batlle,et al.  A simulation model for a competitive generation market , 2000 .

[18]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  An auction design for local reserve energy markets , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Bidding under price uncertainty in multi-unit pay-as-bid procurement auctions for power systems reserve , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  S. Rassenti,et al.  Discriminatory Price Auctions in Electricity Markets: Low Volatility at the Expense of High Price Levels , 2003 .

[21]  Henrik Lund,et al.  Integrated energy systems and local energy markets , 2006 .

[22]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions , 1978 .

[23]  Stamatis Karnouskos,et al.  Demand Side Management via prosumer interactions in a smart city energy marketplace , 2011, 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies.

[24]  Vasconcelos,et al.  Survey of Regulatory and Technological Developments Concerning Smart Metering in the European Union Electricity Market , 2008 .

[25]  Robert Wilson ACTIVITY RULES FOR A POWER EXCHANGE , 1998 .

[26]  Gary A. Mattson The Promise of Citizen Coproduction: Some Persistent Issues , 1986 .

[27]  Boo-Sung Kang The Effect of Auction Format on Efficiency and Revenue in Divisible Goods Auctions: A Test Using Korean Treasury Auctions , 2008 .

[28]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Single vs. Multiple Bids in Auctions of Divisible Goods , 2013 .

[29]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[30]  The Efficient Diversification of Bids in Treasury Bill Auctions , 1979 .

[31]  Bruno Francois,et al.  Energy Management and Operational Planning of a Microgrid With a PV-Based Active Generator for Smart Grid Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[32]  J. Kagel,et al.  Independent Private Value Auctions: Bidder Behaviour in First-, Second- and Third-Price Auctions with Varying Numbers of Bidders , 1993 .

[33]  J.A.P. Lopes,et al.  Defining control strategies for MicroGrids islanded operation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[34]  J. Kagel,et al.  Behavior in Multi-Unit Demand Auctions: Experiments with Uniform Price and Dynamic Vickrey Auctions * , 2001 .

[35]  Matching and bargaining models of markets: approximating small markets by large markets , 1998 .

[36]  Robert B. Wilson Auctions of Shares , 1979 .

[37]  D. Ray Electric power industry restructuring in Australia: Lessons from down-under. Occasional paper No. 20 , 1997 .

[38]  Christoph Weber,et al.  Ausgestaltung des deutschen Regelenergiemarktes , 2003 .

[39]  Tibor Neugebauer,et al.  Bidding ‘as if’ risk neutral in experimental first price auctions without information feedback , 2008 .

[40]  Eileen Cashman,et al.  Operational risks, bidding strategies and information policies in restructured power markets , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  Orly Sade,et al.  Divisible Good Auctions with Asymmetric Information: An Experimental Examination , 2012, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[42]  Tibor Neugebauer,et al.  Individual behavior of first-price auctions: The importance of information feedback in computerized experimental markets , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[43]  Fjo De Ridder,et al.  Demand side integration: four potential business cases and an analysis of the 2020 situation , 2011 .

[44]  M. V. Cazzol,et al.  A simulation tool for short term electricity markets , 2001, PICA 2001. Innovative Computing for Power - Electric Energy Meets the Market. 22nd IEEE Power Engineering Society. International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications (Cat. No.01CH37195).

[45]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  From electricity smart grids to smart energy systems – A market operation based approach and understanding , 2012 .

[46]  Axel Ockenfels,et al.  Impulse balance equilibrium and feedback in first price auctions , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[47]  Diego Moreno,et al.  Prices, Delay, and the Dynamics of Trade , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[48]  S. Rassenti,et al.  Cotenancy and competition in an experimental auction market for natural gas pipeline networks , 1994 .

[49]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Divisible-good uniform price auctions: The role of allocation rules and communication among bidders , 2009 .

[50]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  A Critical Survey of Agent-Based Wholesale Electricity Market Models , 2008 .

[51]  Ilan Kremer,et al.  Underpricing and Market Power in Uniform Price Auctions , 2002 .

[52]  A. Roth,et al.  Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term* , 1995 .

[53]  P.W. Lehn,et al.  Micro-grid autonomous operation during and subsequent to islanding process , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[54]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Multi-unit demand auctions with synergies: behavior in sealed-bid versus ascending-bid uniform-price auctions , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[55]  G. Joos,et al.  Integration of distributed generation and wind energy in Canada , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[56]  Kjell G. Nyborg,et al.  Repo Auctions and the Market for Liquidity , 2009 .