Efficient TCAD methodology for ESD failure current prediction of smart power ESD protection

This work deals with a method to predict ESD protection robustness with TCAD simulations. Tested on different devices and two smart power technologies, the results are validated with electrical measurement and failure analysis. Failure current is always predicted with a good accuracy compared to technology spreading. In addition, the methodology provides a significant simulation time speedup compared to classical methods based on a temperature criterion.

[1]  Mark R. Pinto,et al.  ULSI technology development by predictive simulations , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[2]  H. Masuda,et al.  TCAD strategy for predictive VLSI memory development , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[3]  Nicolas Nolhier,et al.  Design guidelines to achieve a very high ESD robustness in a self-biased NPN , 2002, 2002 Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium.

[4]  G. Groos,et al.  Experimental extraction of the electron impact-ionization coefficient at large operating temperatures , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[5]  A. Amerasekera,et al.  Electrothermal behavior of deep submicron nMOS transistors under high current snapback (ESD/EOS) conditions , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[6]  Kai Esmark Device simulation of ESD protection elements , 2001 .