AEROCOM/AEROSAT AAOT & SSA study, part I: evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements

Abstract. Global measurements of absorptive aerosol optical depth (AAOD) are scarce and mostly provided by the ground network AERONET (AErosol RObotic NETwork). In recent years, several satellite products of AAOD have appeared. This study's primary aim is to establish the usefulness of these datasets for AEROCOM (AEROsol Comparisons between Observations and Models) model evaluation with a focus on the years 2006, 2008 and 2010. The satellite products are super-observations consisting of 1° × 1° × 30min aggregated retrievals. This study consist of two parts: 1) an assessment of satellite datasets; 2) their application to the evaluation of AEROCOM models. The current paper describes the first part and details an evaluation with AERONET observations from the sparse AERONET network as well as a global intercomparison of satellite datasets, with a focus on how minimum AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) thresholds and temporal averaging may improve agreement. All satellite datasets are shown to have reasonable skill for AAOD (3 out of 4 datasets show correlations with AERONET in excess of 0.6) but less skill for SSA (Single Scattering Albedo; only 1 out of 4 datasets shows correlations with AERONET in excess of 0.6). In comparison, satellite AOD shows correlations from 0.72 to 0.88 against the same AERONET dataset. We do show that performance vs. AERONET and satellite agreements for SSA significantly improve at higher AOD. Temporal averaging also improves agreements between satellite datasets. Nevertheless multi-annual averages still show systematic differences, even at high AOD. In particular, we show that two POLDER products appear to have a systematic SSA difference over land of about 0.04, independent of AOD. Identifying the cause of this bias offers the possibility of substantially improving current datasets. We also provide evidence that suggests that evaluation with AERONET observations leads to an underestimate of true biases in satellite SSA. In the second part of this study we show that, notwithstanding these biases in satellite AAOD and SSA, the datasets allow meaningful evaluation of AEROCOM models.

[1]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[2]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[3]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Will a perfect model agree with perfect observations? The impact of spatial sampling , 2016 .

[4]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Cloud-Screening and Quality Control Algorithms for the AERONET Database , 2000 .

[5]  K. Taylor Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[6]  D. Cayan,et al.  Kawasaki disease and ENSO‐driven wind circulation , 2013 .

[7]  S. Twomey Pollution and the Planetary Albedo , 1974 .

[8]  Otto Hasekamp,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol microphysical and optical properties over land using a multimode approach , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[9]  P. Bhartia,et al.  Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data , 1997 .

[10]  Jean-François Léon,et al.  Application of spheroid models to account for aerosol particle nonsphericity in remote sensing of desert dust , 2006 .

[11]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Comparison of aerosol optical depth from four solar radiometers during the fall 1997 ARM intensive observation period , 1999 .

[12]  S. Conil,et al.  Impacts of Aeolian dust deposition on European forest sustainability: A review , 2012 .

[13]  Pavel Litvinov,et al.  Aerosol properties over the ocean from PARASOL multiangle photopolarimetric measurements , 2011 .

[14]  Yuzhong Zhang,et al.  Top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing affected by brown carbon in the upper troposphere , 2017 .

[15]  T. Andrews,et al.  Fast and slow precipitation responses to individual climate forcers: A PDRMIP multimodel study , 2016 .

[16]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[17]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Central American biomass burning smoke can increase tornado severity in the U.S. , 2015 .

[18]  D. Tanré,et al.  Comparison of aerosol optical properties above clouds between POLDER and AeroCom models over the South East Atlantic Ocean during the fire season , 2016 .

[19]  T. Eck,et al.  Intercomparison of aerosol single‐scattering albedo derived from AERONET surface radiometers and LARGE in situ aircraft profiles during the 2011 DRAGON‐MD and DISCOVER‐AQ experiments , 2014 .

[20]  M. Bocquet,et al.  Modelling and assimilation of lidar signals over Greater Paris during the MEGAPOLI summer campaign , 2013 .

[21]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Statistically optimized inversion algorithm for enhanced retrieval of aerosol properties from spectral multi-angle polarimetric satellite observations , 2010 .

[22]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[23]  M. McCormick,et al.  Development of global aerosol models using cluster analysis of Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) measurements , 2005 .

[24]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global impact of smoke aerosols from landscape fires on climate and the Hadley circulation , 2013 .

[25]  A. Hodzic,et al.  Impact of Biomass Burning Aerosols on the Diurnal Cycle of Convective Clouds and Precipitation Over a Tropical Island , 2017 .

[26]  Omar Torres,et al.  Improvements to the OMI near-UV aerosol algorithm using A-train CALIOP and AIRS observations , 2013 .

[27]  I. Tegen,et al.  Large-Scale Modeling of Absorbing Aerosols and Their Semi-Direct Effects , 2018, Atmosphere.

[28]  M. Schulz,et al.  On the spatio-temporal representativeness of observations , 2017 .

[29]  Dan Chen,et al.  Dust radiative effects on atmospheric thermodynamics and tropical cyclogenesis over the Atlantic Ocean using WRF-Chem coupled with an AOD data assimilation system , 2016 .

[30]  David J. Delene,et al.  Variability of Aerosol Optical Properties at Four North American Surface Monitoring Sites , 2002 .

[31]  Kai Zhang,et al.  MAC‐v1: A new global aerosol climatology for climate studies , 2013 .

[32]  J. K. Ayers,et al.  Effect of biomass burning on marine stratocumulus clouds off the California coast , 2009 .

[33]  G. de Leeuw,et al.  An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation , 2020, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[34]  O. Torres,et al.  Accuracy assessment of MODIS land aerosol optical thickness algorithms using AERONET measurements over North America , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[35]  Otto P. Hasekamp,et al.  Direct radiative effect of aerosols based on PARASOL and OMI satellite observations , 2017 .

[36]  A. Ångström Atmospheric turbidity, global illumination and planetary albedo of the earth , 1962 .

[37]  B. Samset,et al.  Comparison of AOD, AAOD and column single scattering albedo from AERONET retrievals and in situ profiling measurements , 2017 .

[38]  J. Pelon,et al.  Quantifying black carbon deposition over the Greenland ice sheet from forest fires in Canada , 2017 .

[39]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  The AERONET Version 3 aerosol retrieval algorithm, associated uncertainties and comparisons to Version 2 , 2020, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[40]  T. Eck,et al.  Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols , 1999 .

[41]  A. Berjón,et al.  Sensitivity of aerosol retrieval to geometrical configuration of ground-based sun/sky radiometer observations , 2013 .

[42]  Jasper R. Lewis,et al.  Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[43]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants , 2009, The Lancet.

[44]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Global‐scale black carbon profiles observed in the remote atmosphere and compared to models , 2010 .

[45]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  Impact of satellite viewing-swath width on global and regional aerosol optical thickness statistics and trends , 2013 .

[46]  Junnan Yang,et al.  Reduction of solar photovoltaic resources due to air pollution in China , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Impact of sulfate aerosols on albedo and lifetime of clouds: A sensitivity study with the ECHAM4 GCM , 1997 .

[48]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Global indirect aerosol effects: a review , 2004 .

[49]  Johannes Quaas,et al.  Analysis of polarimetric satellite measurements suggests stronger cooling due to aerosol-cloud interactions , 2019, Nature Communications.

[50]  P. Forster,et al.  Local biomass burning is a dominant cause of the observed precipitation reduction in southern Africa , 2016, Nature Communications.

[51]  M. Chin,et al.  Constraining global aerosol emissions using POLDER/PARASOL satellite remote sensing observations , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[52]  J. Lilliestam,et al.  Blue skies over China: The effect of pollution-control on solar power generation and revenues , 2018, PloS one.

[53]  Pavel Litvinov,et al.  Models for surface reflection of radiance and polarized radiance: Comparison with airborne multi-angle photopolarimetric measurements and implications for modeling top-of-atmosphere measurements , 2011 .

[54]  Philip Stier,et al.  The importance of temporal collocation for the evaluation of aerosol models with observations , 2015 .

[55]  N. Schutgens Site representativity of AERONET and GAW remotely sensed AOT and AAOT observations , 2019 .

[56]  Pawan K. Bhartia,et al.  Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[57]  M. Chin,et al.  Retrieval of desert dust and carbonaceous aerosol emissions over Africa from POLDER/PARASOL products generated by the GRASP algorithm , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.