Follow-Up of Cholesteatoma Surgery: Open versus Closed Tympanoplasty

Background: There are no universally accepted opinions about the choice of surgical technique and outcome of surgery for cholesteatoma in different age groups and localizations. Methods: A prospective study of 758 patients with cholesteatomas was performed. They were divided into three age groups: children younger than 9 years, adolescents aged 10–16 years, and adults. Cholesteatoma was classified as: attic, sinus and tensa cholesteatoma. Classical canal wall-up or wall-down tympanoplasty was performed in all the cases, and reoperation was done later if needed. Anatomical and functional results were followed up regularly, and evaluated 3 years after the operations. Results: During the postoperative course, after 3 years, retraction of the neomembrane was found in 23.8% of younger children, 27.6% of adolescents, and in 9.9% of adults. Recurrent cholesteatomas were more than twice as frequent in children (19.0%) as in adults (9.4%). Reoperation was performed in 38.1% of children and in 9.4% adults. In one fourth of pediatric cholesteatoma reoperations, conversion to open tympanoplasty was done. Retraction and recurrent disease were present in about 10% of attic and sinus cholesteatomas, and in 15.5% of tensa cholesteatomas. Conclusion: Postoperative audiological results of cholesteatoma surgery in children are comparable to adults. Retraction pockets, recurrent cholesteatomas and reoperations are twice as frequent in the pediatric group as in adults. The worst anatomical and functional results are achieved in tensa cholesteatomas. The age of the patient and localization of cholesteatoma are very important factors that determine the type of surgical procedure and the results of surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma. A closed technique is better for attic and sinus cholesteatomas, while in tensa cholesteatomas, an open technique seems more appropriate.

[1]  S. Ghosh,et al.  A study of recurrence of retraction pockets after various methods of primary reconstruction of attic and mesotympanic defects in combined approach tympanoplasty. , 2003, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[2]  W. Lippy,et al.  Staging for Cholesteatoma in the Child, Adolescent, and Adult , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  E. Vartiainen Ten-year results of canal wall down mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatoma. , 2000, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[4]  B. Woodson,et al.  Carcinoma of the larynx in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. , 1996, American journal of otolaryngology.

[5]  M. Syms,et al.  Management of Cholesteatoma: Status of the Canal Wall , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  C. Kasse,et al.  Efficacy of Surgical Treatment of Chronic Otitis Media , 2003, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  T. P. Murphy,et al.  Hearing results in pediatric patients after canal-wall-up and canal-wall-down mastoid surgery , 1998, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[8]  D. Edelstein,et al.  Cholesteatoma in the Pediatric Age Group , 1988, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  T. Nakashima,et al.  Surgical strategy for cholesteatoma in children. , 2001, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[10]  B. Gantz,et al.  Hearing results after cholesteatoma surgery: The iowa experience , 1987, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  J. Dornhoffer Retrograde Mastoidectomy with Canal Wall Reconstruction: A Single-Stage Technique for Cholesteatoma Removal , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[12]  Sun O Chang,et al.  Prognostic factors of recidivism in pediatric cholesteatoma surgery. , 2003, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[13]  K. Berliner,et al.  Reporting operative hearing results: does choice of outcome measure make a difference? , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[14]  M. K. Chen,et al.  Canal-wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoidectomy for advanced cholesteatoma. , 2000, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[15]  M. A. Şafak,et al.  Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma in children. , 2003, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[16]  M. Siddiq,et al.  Long-term hearing results of incus transposition. , 2004, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[17]  M. Tos,et al.  Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. , 1989, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[18]  P. Cayé-Thomasen,et al.  A tympanometric comparison of tympanoplasty with cartilage palisades or fascia after surgery for tensa cholesteatoma in children , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[19]  Andy T A Chung,et al.  Reversible Canal Wall Down Mastoidectomy for Acquired Cholesteatomas: Preliminary Results , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  S. Dutt,et al.  Transcanal Atticoaditotomy and Transcortical Mastoidectomy for Cholesteatoma: The Farrior-Olaizola Technique Revisited , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[21]  D. Kamerer,et al.  Single Stage Management of Cholesteatoma , 1995, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[22]  J. Farrior,et al.  Long-term results using ossicular grafts. , 1996, The American journal of otology.