Ensuring fair access in IEEE 802.11p-based vehicle-to-infrastructure networks

IEEE 802.11p is an approved amendment to the IEEE 802.11 standard to facilitate wireless access in vehicular environments (WAVE). In this article, we present an analytical model to evaluate the impact of vehicle mobility on the saturation throughput of IEEE 802.11p-based vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) networks. The throughput model is then used to investigate an unfairness problem that exists in such networks among vehicles with different mobility characteristics. Assuming a saturated network, if all the vehicles in the network use the same MAC parameters, IEEE 802.11p MAC protocol provides equal transmission opportunity for all of them, provided they have equal residence time in the coverage area of a road side unit (RSU). When vehicles have different mobility characteristics (e.g., extremely high and low speeds), they do not have similar chances of channel access. A vehicle moving with higher velocity has less chance to communicate with its RSU, as compared to a slow moving vehicle, due to its short residence time in the coverage area of RSU. Accordingly, the data transfer of a higher velocity vehicle gets degraded significantly, as compared to that of the vehicle with lower velocity, resulting in unfairness among them. In this article, our aim is to address this unfairness problem that exists among vehicles of different velocities in V2I networks. Analytical expressions are derived for optimal minimum CW (CWmin) required to ensure fairness, in the sense of equal chance of communicating with RSU, among competing vehicles of different mean velocities in the network. Analytical results are validated using extensive simulations.

[1]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  On the enhancements to IEEE 802.11 MAC and their suitability for safety-critical applications in VANET , 2010, CMC 2010.

[2]  Yang Xiao,et al.  Performance analysis of priority schemes for IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[4]  Michel Dubois,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the , 1995 .

[5]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  Mobility impact in IEEE 802.11p infrastructureless vehicular networks , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  Thomas M. Chen,et al.  Performance analysis of DSRC priority mechanism for road safety applications in vehicular networks , 2011, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[7]  A. Ganz,et al.  Secure Priority Based Inter-Vehicle Communication MAC Protocol for Highway Safety Messaging , 2007, 2007 4th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems.

[8]  Marco Conti,et al.  Dynamic tuning of the IEEE 802.11 protocol to achieve a theoretical throughput limit , 2000, TNET.

[9]  Wing Cheong Lau,et al.  Modeling resource sharing for a road-side access point supporting drive-thru internet , 2009, VANET '09.

[10]  Farid Ashtiani,et al.  A modified 802.11-based MAC scheme to assure fair access for vehicle-to-roadside communications , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[11]  Guillermo Acosta-Marum,et al.  Wave: A tutorial , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  Der-Jiunn Deng,et al.  Contention window optimization for ieee 802.11 DCF access control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Jung-Shyr Wu,et al.  A Channel Access Scheme to Compromise Throughput and Fairness in IEEE 802.11p Multi-Rate/Multi-Channel Wireless Vehicular Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[14]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  Performance and Reliability of DSRC Vehicular Safety Communication: A Formal Analysis , 2009, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[15]  K. Psounis,et al.  IEEE 802.11p performance evaluation and protocol enhancement , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety.

[16]  Wing Cheong Lau,et al.  Analytical Models and Performance Evaluation of Drive-thru Internet Systems , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  MAC Performance Analysis for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[18]  S. Spraggs,et al.  Traffic Engineering , 2000 .

[19]  Stephan Eichler,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p WAVE Communication Standard , 2007, 2007 IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[20]  William R. McShane,et al.  A review of pedestrian safety models for urban areas in Low and Middle Income Countries , 2016 .

[21]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[22]  Hao Wu,et al.  Spatial Propagation of Information in Vehicular Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[23]  Xuemin Shen,et al.  MAC in Motion: Impact of Mobility on the MAC of Drive-Thru Internet , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[24]  S. Yousefi,et al.  Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs): Challenges and Perspectives , 2006, 2006 6th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications.

[25]  Anchare V. Babu,et al.  Fairness Analysis of IEEE 802.11 Multirate Wireless LANs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[26]  Hai Le Vu,et al.  Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol for DSRC with and without Retransmissions , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM).

[27]  Raj Jain,et al.  A Quantitative Measure Of Fairness And Discrimination For Resource Allocation In Shared Computer Systems , 1998, ArXiv.