Audience Selectivity and Involvement in the Newer Media Environment

This study filled gaps in previous research on audience activity by focusing on the temporal dimension of audience activity in the newer media environment. Specifically, this study considered two types of selectivity: program selection before exposure and changing channels while viewing. This study included four indications of audience involvement: intentionality, or anticipating television viewing; attention, or focused cognitive effort; elaboration, or thinking about program content; and engaging in distractions while viewing. Because the newer media environment provides more program choice, 342 cable subscribers who also owned remote-control devices completed questionnaires. Partial correlations indicated that selectivity and involvement were not necessarily consistent across time. But more salient viewing motives are linked to more preexposure activity. Canonical correlation revealed that instrumental use is marked by higher levels of activity before exposure and involvement during exposure. Ritualistic television use is reflected in higher selectivity before and during exposure but less involvement during exposure. The discussion focuses on implications of these findings for gratification-seeking activity and media effects.

[1]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A SENSATION-SEEKING SCALE. , 1964, Journal of consulting psychology.

[2]  Raymond A. Bauer,et al.  The obstinate audience: The influence process from the point of view of social communication. , 1964 .

[3]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[4]  H. E. Krugman.  THE MEASUREMENT OF ADVERTISING INVOLVEMENT , 1966 .

[5]  E. Katz,et al.  The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. , 1975 .

[6]  R. M. Durand,et al.  Some Precautions in Using Canonical Analysis , 1975 .

[7]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[8]  M. Levine.  Canonical Analysis and Factor Comparison , 1977 .

[9]  W. Gantz,et al.  How Uses and Gratifications Affect Recall of Television News , 1978 .

[10]  J. Blumler.  The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies , 1979 .

[11]  J. Lull.  THE SOCIAL USES OF TELEVISION , 1980 .

[12]  James A. Danowski,et al.  Process Gratification in Aging Cohorts , 1980 .

[13]  D. Cegala,et al.  Interaction Involvement: A Cognitive Dimension of Communicative Competence. , 1981 .

[14]  Melvin J. Voigt,et al.  Progress in Communication Sciences , 1982 .

[15]  James Lull,et al.  How families select television programs: A mass‐observational study , 1982 .

[16]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[17]  Jacob J. Wakshlag,et al.  The impact of group viewing on patterns of television program choice , 1982 .

[18]  A. Rubin.  Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations , 1983 .

[19]  James G. Webster,et al.  The impact of cable and pay cable television on local station audiences , 1983 .

[20]  Viewer uses of promotional media to find out about television programs , 1983 .

[21]  Jacob J. Wakshlag,et al.  A THEORY OF TELEVISION PROGRAM CHOICE , 1983 .

[22]  M. R. Levy,et al.  AUDIENCE ACTIVITY AND GRATIFICATIONS , 1984 .

[23]  D. Rouner.  Active Televison Viewing and the Cultivation Hypothesis , 1984 .

[24]  Philip Palmgreen,et al.  Uses and Gratifications: A Theoretical Perspective , 1984 .

[25]  A. Rubin.  Ritualized and Instrumental Television Viewing , 1984 .

[26]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  PROGRAM SELECTION WITH ABUNDANCE OF CHOICE , 1985 .

[27]  K. Rosengren,et al.  Media gratifications research : current perspectives , 1985 .

[28]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  Uses of daytime television soap operas by college students , 1985 .

[29]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[30]  Elizabeth M. Perse,et al.  Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation , 1986 .

[31]  A. Rubin,et al.  Audience Activity and Soap Opera Involvement: A Uses and Effects Investigation. , 1987 .

[32]  A. Rubin.  A Methodological Investigation of Cultivation. , 1987 .

[33]  Robert Abelman,et al.  Religious television uses and gratifications , 1987 .

[34]  Mark R. Levy,et al.  VCR Use and the Concept of Audience Activity. , 1987 .

[35]  A. Rubin,et al.  Audience Activity and Television News Gratifications , 1987 .

[36]  J. R. Walker.  Inheritance effects in the new media environment , 1988 .

[37]  D. L. Swanson,et al.  Disentangling Antecedents of Audience Exposure Levels: Extending Expectancy-Value Analyses of Gratifications Sought from Television News. , 1988 .

[38]  D. S. Taylor,et al.  A Methodological Examination of Cultivation , 1988 .

[39]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  Audience Activity and Satisfaction with Favorite Television Soap Opera , 1988 .